Time
Warner moved almost not at all today, down
only six cents on below-average volume of about 21 million shares. And at $17.34, the stock is smack dab in the
middle of the company's very tiny 52-week range (low: $16.10, high: $19.00).Everyone seems to be in a holding pattern awaiting the earnings release later this week. But that doesn't mean no one cares! Someone always cares about Time Warner. Today, it's the family-friendly lobby, who is up in arms over the new family-friendly packages cable companies, like Time Warner and Comcast are offering - and not marketing enough. They'd rather see a la carte options so each family can decide what, indeed, it deems to be friendly.
As Carlo at Techdirt points out, "Cable companies aren't completely stupid -- if offering a la carte, or spending more to market family tiers would pay off, they'd jump on it." Everyone who's been through a microeconomics course at a good business school has done the problem set where we learn that bundling cable channels maximizes revenue! And what do shareholders want more than maximized revenue? Certainly not cable companies parenting our kids (and choosing, for instance, whether our kids should watch Fox News, or Animal Planet, or neither of the above). Commenters at Techdirt riff on cable monopolies, extortion, and bad parenting but I think none of this matters: shareholders don't give a darn whether or not Time Warner markets family-friendly cable bundles. As long as that revenue stays maximized.
5-Hour Energy: A Success Equal Parts Caffeine, Chemistry and…
How State Taxes Put a Bigger Pinch on the Poor


Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
5-02-2006 @ 3:58AM
EJ Passeos said...
Good Morning. Nice post.
I know the ala cart option is considered "nuclear",but some on Wall Street don't agree. Dish/Direct TV no longer offer the $29.99 option anymore (after 3 month trial), so there is clearly a market for budget consumers. People loathe our local TWC because of their prices, but in reality they aren't that high. It's just that most people feel they are paying for channel they don't watch. I think the TW of the world would do themselves a favor by realizing some people don't understand the great features of their digital box, and truly want basic cable. On the other hand, there are people (me) who pay for digital, but still don't get what they really want (Boomerang is extra?).
5-02-2006 @ 1:35PM
F. Williams said...
Dick Parsons is not the guy to lead Time Warner.
I sense he has the job because he is black and TW
is an entertainment company. The COO is probably
running the company. Talk about a lucky guy! Just
smile and stand here. We will write your letters
for you and pay you millions.