Sphere, a new search engine with $3.75 million in VC funding from Hearst
Publishing, Trident Capital and About.com founder Scott Kurnit, launched this week. GigaOm reviewed the site last fall, giving it a
thumbs-up. Zdnet also gives it a good review, noting that is
"generally speedy" and the interface is "clean and easy to navigate." Here are some other
reviews:
TechCrunch: "As great as the basic search platform is, what I like best about Sphere is in the Tools area. Install the “Sphere It” bookmarklet and click it whenever you are reading something that you’d like more information on. Sphere will analyze the page in real time and present blog search results that are relevant to that topic. It’s important to note that this is not a search to find blogs linking into that page you are viewing; rather you are finding fresh blog content that is related to the subject matter of what you are reading. I’ve tested this and find it extremely useful."
Search Engine Marketing Weblog:
"Sphere has an advanced search algorithm that hunts out relevant high quality and timely blog postings. Sphere
scours the web searching out highly relevant new content relating to your search, and filtering out spam results.
Sphere is said to be a faster way to search blogs, with rich added features....Personally, I am not overly impressed
with the tool. It is nice that they provide up to 7 lines of copy from the related blog in search results, but I did
not find that the posting were relavant enough."
Businessweek: "...My favorite feature is the custom day search. You can monitor history with it....Somehow I published the post twice. I've fixed that. An hour and 20 minutes after posting, I check Sphere to see where it shows up in the results. It appears in the results organized by time, but not in relevance. TechCrunch, Micropersuasion and others are all viewed as highly relevant--but not mine. Why is that? Maybe the Sphere engine saw my duplicate post and figured I was less than serious. But the engine is also engineered to take longer posts more seriously, CEO Tony Conrad has told me. So... By adding this paragraph, do I rise in the relevance rankings? I'll keep an eye out."
ResearchBuzz : "And after
trying out Sphere, I think I like it, but it does have some of the disadvantages of those blog search engines that
index entire pages instead of just RSS feeds...My biggest problem with Sphere was the fact that it apparently indexes
full sites and not RSS feeds only. This means that occasionally you'll get a result, go look at it, and see that it's
on the bottom of a long blog page. Or you'll search for a blog name and find zillions of instances of it, but not as
post mentions, but as inclusions on a blogroll. Setting narrow timeframes for the search results (a week or ten days)
seems to tone down this problem some. "
The Social Software Blog: "Good
support for RSS, results that look useful, multimedia options, AJAX, date and relevance variables. The downsides
are that there doesn't appear to be a FireFox plug-in yet, no support for tagging or other user applied metadata and a
widget that only works with TypePad. That it's not based entirely on inbound links and doesn't support tags means
that the algorithm really takes a different approach."










