Following on Brian White's coverage last week of Al Gore's pending visit to Wal-Mart HQ today on the topic of Global Warming is an AP article on some of Wal-Mart's recent eco-friendly efforts.
Wal-Mart's official estimate of the amount of carbon dioxide it emits was roughly 20.8 million metric tons. To put that in perspective, Coca-Cola emits about 5 million metric tons and American Electric Power emits around 160 million metric tons.
Wal-Mart has been the target of various environmental groups for it eco-practices or lack thereof.
Ahead of Al Gore's visit today on his Anti-Global Warming campaign, Wal-mart officials have been clamoring to highlight results they have achieved since CEO Lee Scott launched the official Wal-Mart "good steward for the environment" campaign last October as well as initiatives the company plans on launching.
More substantial were comments from Charles Zimmerman, head of developing new stores, and Tim Yatsko, senior vice president of transportation.
From the building new stores angle, Zimmerman commented on the current use and upgrade efforts to more efficient lighting and refrigeration. Additionally that new stores would incorporate design elements and technology to make stores 50% more energy efficient.
Yatsko chimed in with stats detailing Wal-marts results from retrofitting parts of its 7,000 truck fleet with alternative power units. The alternative units have reduced fuel costs by roughly 8 percent, reducing emissions by 100,000 metric tons and saving Wal-mart $25 million dollars.
This is an interesting topic as one must try and assess what Wal-mart's motivation and rationale behind its "eco-friendly" efforts are.
Estimates of Wal-marts supply chain's total emissions (CO2) are in the neighborhood of 200 million metric tons.
On the one hand Wal-mart, being as large as it is, could potentially be a boon for the environment in that Wal-mart could pro-actively manage it's supply chain to reduce a tremendous amount of carbon dioxide emissions. Wal-marts size allows it to levy pressure on suppliers that may otherwise not have chosen to go a bit "green".
On the other hand, is Wal-mart being responsible in it's efforts? The two concrete examples provided by Wal-mart officials seem to have Wal-mart's "bottom line" profit more in mind than the environment. Reducing 100,000 metric tons of emissions equates to roughly 0.5% reduction in its emissions, while the savings boosts bottom-line profit by $25 million.
Of course, one can't expect Wal-mart to forgo its bottom line just to help the environment. It certainly does show though that a company can boost its profit while also profiting the environment. What will be interesting is to see how Wal-mart walks that line.










