Caroline Baum over at Bloomberg wrote today that the Democratic candidates for major public office -- who have crossed Iowa recently with negative-speak about the world's largest retailer -- should shop there. Why? Because, Wal-Mart saves the average American family roughly $2,300 per year, according to Global Insight. In other words, Baum is saying that the Democratic politicians currently on a dragon-slaying mission against Wal-Mart should remove themselves from their perches and actually visit and shop there.Regardless of your position, it's always a great idea to immerse yourself in whatever environment you current are lauding or despising, to ensure what your experience is matches with your pre-conceived notions and bias. We all have biases -- some just choose not to admit it. Politicians, as usual, love to stir up emotional issues to garner emotional votes, and the current war in progress, gasoline prices and retailing behemoths qualify as emotional lighting rods for these folks.
The fact is that workers choose to work at Wal-Mart, and larger companies (and any company) don't "owe" a certain wage or benefits to workers. It's a capitalistic choice to provide these things, unless America was a socialist country the last time I looked (not yet). While I don't agree with Wal-Mart's pay scale or benefits, which don't really provide the level of comfort needed for a family, the company is not handcuffing employees to the store, are they? I agree with Baum on this one.
Brian White has worked in various executive positions in technology and telecommunications and now focuses on editing and writing.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-22-2006 @ 3:43PM
ETB said...
Wal-Mart Republican?
Heck anybody with any sense knows Wal-Mart is just s slight step "maybe" above Big Lots.
And lord knows both are dumps for junk that gets thrown out in less than a month.
8-22-2006 @ 3:48PM
Dan Barnett said...
Give me a break!
The Capitalist theoretical model Mr White depends upon assumes that employers & employees have equal bargaining power. (It is a discussion for another day if that model has ever existed or in fact can exist)Wal-Mart realizes that their employees have little choice but to work for the poverty level wages offered. Their employees have few options. There are not many options for other employemnt since Wal-Mart tends to dry up other employment opportunities in the area.
Wal-Mart (& Mr. White) have forgotten what Henry Ford proved so successfully: An employee can also be a consumer. Or perhaps Wal-Mart wants to insure that their employees can't afford to shop anywhere else.
8-22-2006 @ 5:21PM
kaetherine Smith said...
How snobbie can you be. Walmart didn't get to be the largest retailer by NOT selling things. People shop there because they get good prices and people work there because they can get employment. How many companies hire 65+ people. Not many.
8-22-2006 @ 5:40PM
Bill Langley said...
Vote hustling..Wal-Mart hires many who could not get other jobs, seniors, etc. Leave them alone as they did not get big by not offering products at a low price...Dims should look else where for their votes.