There is no housing bubble. That is a stupid term promoted by journalists and analysts fighting the last war like an old general. The stock market "bubble" burst sending the NASDAQ plummeting from 5000 to 1200. Anybody foresee housing for sale at an 80% discount let me know and I might be able to help you with that problem. It's not going to happen!
If and when certain markets collapse 20% to 30%, it should not be deemed a bubble. It will happen in some markets and has happened in over-built condo markets. But these units will be absorbed in the next few years. The greatest pain will be felt by the biggest speculators and the most overzealous people participating in unorthodox loan programs.
How many stocks move up and down that much in a year? Plenty! Think Google, or Merck, or Black and Decker. Even I, who have been trying to add some sanity to GOOG's valuation through numerous posts, never said GOOG was a bubble stock.
There is a need for more housing, period! As a current investor in four different housing projects -- three in Southern California and one in Phoenix --I can testify that all will sell at considerable profits. We have seen no let-up in demand. Each one is different: One is an infill project of 150 single family homes. Another is a new development of 200 homes in a growing community, a third is a mixed use project of 60 condominiums over retail stores and the fourth is a unique town home project surrounding a parking structure that is commercial adjacent.
The only problem we see is getting entitlements and building permits. This process has become excruciatingly painful in many parts of the country and just about everywhere in California. My home town of Santa Monica being one of the worst offenders, used to be referred to as "The People's Republic of Santa Monica." That was too long a nickname so some just started calling it "Soviet Monica." I love this community but there are times I think we are all over-indulgent meddlers.
If I had a magic wand and created 1,000 unit condominium or apartment projects in Santa Monica or anywhere nearby, all the units could be sold in one week, even in this "bubble market." I have read and heard from numerous sources that our region of the country is going to see an increase in the population of five million people in the next 20 years, not counting any immigration or migration. Heck if I know where they are going to live.
There is no housing bubble in the Gulf States either and no one expects them to come close to cleaning up the devastating results of last years hurricane season any time soon. KB Homes was early to examine opportunities and have already started projects in the region. While there is a massive need in this area of the country other pockets of opportunity exist as well. We are in a retrenchment period as we sell off the speculative markets, adjust to higher but NOT HIGH interest rates and deal with higher commodity prices.
Yes there have been areas that over built based on speculation and greed with people biting off more than they can chew. Eighteen months ago I advised a friend wanting to get in on the Las Vegas boom that he should forget about it. He was interested in a housing tract where a third friend claimed he was making big money. Well, that guy got out just in time to break even. Friend No. 1 would have lost his savings.
While Las Vegas and Florida have seen a market pullback, the only thing I have seen is that homes are taking longer to sell. This is due in part to sellers latent realization that the market has shifted and they need to adjust their expectations. This will happen over the next year or two. Some people with edgy loans will also become victims of their risky propositions and that shake-out will take a little longer based on particular loan terms.
Andrew Barry's story in Barron's and our story by Tom Taulli, Barron's: Time to buy real estate stocks?, both discuss many factors related to whether there might be an investing opportunity in the downturn for housing stocks. I do not know the real estate market everywhere, but I know enough to know there is opportunity. I think the home builders with a national footprint and strong balance sheet have reached a point where the risk is limited. I have also observed that some housing companies like Lennar (LEN) and KB Homes (KBH) have diversified into other areas like urban infill and mixed use projects.
Is there some risk? Yes. There is always some risk. But the risk now has been greatly reduced. For example, buying a company like DR Horton (DHI), with a P/E of 5.8, selling at book value, while they are paying a 2.8% yield does not seem to be sticking your neck out too far by my standards.
Disclosure: I own Merck and have no other position long or short in any other company mentioned in this article.
Sheldon Liber is the CEO of a small private investment company and the vice president for Design and Research of an Architecture & Planning firm.
GM Kills $10 Million Facebook Ad Campaign Because It Didn't Work
JCPenney's Ron Johnson: 'Customers Don't Get Our Pricing Strategy'


Reader Comments (Page 4 of 4)
9-11-2006 @ 11:34AM
Sheldon said...
Then by that definition we did not have a bubble in half the country. I will accept we had "bubblets"-- perhaps 25% of the country has had a bubble. But in comparison the stock market bubble hit the world everywhere and when it burst it was all at once.
9-12-2006 @ 10:35PM
Jack said...
First,
If you take the populations of all the states that would be part of that "bubble". CA, AZ, NV, NY, NJ, FL, OR, WA, ID, UT, DC on and on, you would be looking at about 75% of the country is part of that bubble. Sure, Iowa, Oklahoma, etc. are not going to "burst". Since your investments are in California and Arizona, two of the four most likely to burst, I would be concerned about the places you have investments in.
Plus not every stock went up in the late 80s early 90's. Not every stock goes up in a bull market, not everyone goes down in a bear market.
9-12-2006 @ 8:09AM
Sheldon said...
Jack,
Even the states you mention did not have a bubble universally. In California, the inland empire, San Diego and a few other places have seen a softening of home & condo pricing - NO BURST. Santa Monica has not gone down at all but things take longer to sell and the market will soften - NOT BURST. In Las Vegas, Nevada -- I have seen the Burst. It is like this everywhere, Sometimes a burst, sometimes a fizzle, sometimes prices are flat -- Only thing for sure, they have stopped going up and the trend is down. You cannot make the case that all of the States you mention are down everywhere.
9-20-2006 @ 1:35PM
GeoArb! said...
Ha ha, Sheldon, you are banking on the old economy. Big mistake.
I grew up in Culver City and a family member still lives in the house my grandparents scraped for in Santa Monica during the depression. North of Montana. Paid off decades ago.
I was living near my job in OC and got sick of my boomer managers telling me I had to work all day at my job and then freelance enough at night to double my income, just so I could qualify for a loan for a crappy condo in Anaheim or Santa Ana. It makes no sense to work 16-18 hours a day for the privilege of sleeping in a prestigious ZIP code that you never see in daylight except from the crawl on the 405.
The answer? I quit my job and bought a home in BFE, Arizona. Not down in the Valley where your project is. I have a bigger home and yard than I could ever have afforded in SoCal, my office is a Macbook Pro and the people who pay for my work are still in SoCal. Meanwhile I have a much better quality of life with no commute, house payment that is 1/3 of my former monthly rent (plus mortgage interest deduction and equity I wasn't getting before). I bought in with 20% down and properties here are still going up. Why?
Because this sleepy little town is getting more people like me, who have fled the overpriced, overcrowded, overpolluted places you think will yield you profit.
If you think the household servants and service workers that serve the uber-rich and can't leave their jobs because you can't do someone's nails from a distance will be able to afford your properties, you are dreaming. Any sane information worker will eventually figure out they can live better somewhere else. In July, Forbes dubbed us "geographic arbitrageurs."
Having grown up and spent most of my life in LA LA Land, I can honestly say that all of SoCal is under the Hollywood spell that makes people want things they don't need. People are so caught up in keeping up with the Joneses on TV -- not even real Joneses -- that they scramble to get any loan to look like they can afford a life. The last figure I saw from CAR said 35% of loans in OC over the last five years originated under water. Not surprisingly, those people will take a hosing.
Now instead of listening to idiot managers who bought years ago and staring out a 6th floor window at another office high-rise, I can work from the solace of my garden. Four others from my office have followed my lead in the last year, albeit to other locales.
And it's not just the housing costs that are lower. No daily commute, so just as gas prices went through the roof, I only have to fill my SUV's tank every 6-8 weeks. No need for overpriced clothing or dry cleaning. The phone company offers bundles with unlimited long distance and DSL for less than anything in SoCal. I can spend my earnings to improve my personal environment or, heaven forbid, save for retirement.
OK, so it's true that we only have one 4-star restaurant in town. But I really don't miss overpriced sushi at Koi. And if I ever do, a plethora fancy restaurants are no further from where I am than LA is from where I was, only I can get there in 45 minutes instead of three hours. I can also go fishing or hiking 10 minutes from home, in the time I don't spend commuting to a crummy job.
With the exception of New York, which double-taxes telecommuters, all of those "superstar" markets (where my former employer has offices) will eventually be the most polarized in the nation. The uber-rich will own the good properties and decry how the other half lives on what they can make bussing tables or giving pedicures.
Wake up, people. In BFE, nobody needs a BMW or a boob job, and nobody has to pay half a million dollars for a decent place to live.
Hey Steve, why wait to get in on Sheldon's developments in a couple of years?
Real estate investors, take heed: if you play by the old rules that assume everyone has to be physically present to be on the job, you will ultimately lose. Those of us who can escape the (literal) sewers known as Santa Monica Bay and Newport Harbor will not stop at the mosquito-breeding swamp known as Lake Elsinore. We'll keep going to places we can afford a decent quality of life.
Just as technology has changed so many other markets, it will change the real estate equation. It may take a little longer, but if Forbes is already onto it, it can't take that much longer.
10-05-2006 @ 10:12PM
Jack said...
I have to agree with most of what GeoArb! says. I did almost the same thing. Cashed out in Arizona, bought a huge fixer in Texas, about 5 minutes from the beach. Now I have everything paid for, nice home without a mortgage in an area where real estate is moving up each year. I can manage my west coast investments from here and enjoy life.
I grew up in Southern California and most recently spent most of 2004 in the San Francisco area. It amazed me what people will do to buy a home in the bay area. Couples, both working 60 hours a week to qualify for a mortgage. Commuting 2 hours a day each way to work in the city.
All will be ok, as long as they can keep up with their ARM. But if one of them loses one of their jobs, family illness, earthquake, interest rates rise too high, there is just no margin for error. Seems like a house of cards waiting to collapse.
I have to say there seemed to be an endless line of people up there wanting to do the same thing. But what if housing prices fall like they did in the late 80's, early 90's in California?
9-25-2006 @ 2:37PM
Roger Daboss said...
Listening to all the negs and why is housing down its because you see it that way well I'm thinking if a better way of teaching our young of why it is inportant to invest in there home becase every dollar counts and renting and leasing is a total lost the housing market can and should turn around....JMO
9-30-2006 @ 12:52AM
steven s said...
Here's my take on this subject from a working stiff who hasn't missed a paycheck in 30 years. I don't argue about whether were in a up or down market. I just save money and wait until I can buy a property and rent it at a reasonable return. When it's time the numbers just work, but it's only because I've lived through several ups and downs. When I buy everyone is selling and people are scared to buy. I don't do this for a living but I buy, hold, rent, and do this every 4-6 years. For a guy that makes a reasonable salary I've become very wealthy just doing this every once in awhile. It's not rocket science. You just have to adopt the philosophy that pigs get fat and hogs get slaughtered.
10-18-2006 @ 1:41PM
carlo leoni said...
Wake up my friend....your living in a dream world. Yes, we've been in a real estate bubble....and yes, its about to burst wide open. This will probably go down as the biggest real estate crash....ever! And why, because its been the greatest, unwarranted run up ever.....and,reaching totally unreasonable prices. I live in South Florida and I can tell you the number of condos built and under construction is beyond any ability for this area to absorb them. I predict prices will all a minimum of 50% and will take years for recover. Welcome to the real world.