Housing bubble, debt bubble or same thing?


Yesterday I was raked over the hot coals by several readers that feel we are doomed by a housing bubble that I would not accept. See: Housing Truth from Main Street; which turned out to be quite a controversial post.

I stand by most of what I wrote. However, there were plenty of valuable insights that are worth reflection among the ranting and raving. A particular comment by David Gross, although not very deep is important for its simple summary of many comments. It stimulated a response from me that I thought was worthy of a separate post and further discussion.

David's Comment
31. Real estate is a highly leveraged investment, meaning that if the value of a house falls only 5%, then the owner of the house will lose between 25% and 100% of their investment, depending on the size of their down payment. Fact: The national median down payment on residential real estate in 2005 was only 2%. We are definitely in for some major pain.

My Response
David G: Food for thought...
Yes home purchases allow for plenty of leverage. But consider what you have presented. If the median down payment for a house is 2% and the average house costs between $250,000 to $500,000 depending on where you live, then the buyer has only put $5,000 to $10,000 at risk and only if they lose the house.

In truth, just buying the house (with 2% down) they have lost that much money on a "fair market" purchase. If they chose to sell the day after closing escrow, the fees for brokers, escrow, title, documents, taxes and miscellaneous charges (5% to 6% min.) would exceed their down payment.

Why do people do this? Because the reward is huge if the house goes up in value, and the downside has a maximum predictable loss. In reality the big loser is the lender that allowed such leverage. If there are a large number of foreclosures the banks will lose more money than the borrowers.

As a nation we are at fault for allowing this level of leverage (risk)and debt to accumulate, as others have pointed out better than I. Perhaps I would have an easier time accepting the "bubble" word in the context of debt (national debt, trade debt, credit card debt, home equity line debt),which puts us at the greatest risk. Literally, if you translate debt=leverage=risk.

Debt Bubble NOT Housing Bubble
Perhaps the real scary thing that we have created is the Debt Bubble. Perhaps the housing market, being the last available source of equity, supported an economy stretched to it's limits. As many have said, cash-out refinancing has supported consumer spending and in turn the economy far beyond historic patterns.

When does the debt bubble burst?
Despite the metaphor, it will not happen in a burst. It will happen over time with a hissing sound as the air escapes from the economy. It looks to me like the culmination of this will be after the Beijing (China) Summer Olympics as I discussed last week: Global recession? Not until after Beijing Summer Olympics where I also mentioned the notion that the Federal Government should change the Budget Office to the "Department of Pretending."

This leads me into another aspect related to timing. Regardless of your politics, you cannot be very supportive of the current levels of Federal spending (debt) and pretending (keeping things off-line). So it could very well come to pass that the 2008 November elections create an opportunity (right after the Olympics), for the Democrats to be handed the keys to the White house just in time to preside over one scary mess.

What would alter this course?
There is no requirement to suffer, but you cannot postpone paying the piper forever. You can moderate the pain. Clearly lower oil prices, consistent interest rates (not necessarily lower -- current rates are workable if they do not go up from here), and less war. The first two at least have a chance of occurring. The third is unfortunately not likely.

Before the actual Iraq war I heard a retired general interviewed on the radio, who was asked how long we would be in Iraq. His reply was ominous, "100 years" he said. UNBELIEVABLE I thought as did the interviewer, until the general reminded us that we are still in Korea (60 years), Germany, Japan, Italy and how many other places... That is not to say a war will last that long. But what is an Iraqi peace? Somebody else will have to take that one on.

So at the risk of your wrath I invite comments for further discussion about this important topic.

Sheldon Liber is the CEO of a small private investment company and the vice president for Design and Research of an Architecture & Planning firm.

Reader Comments (Page 2 of 2)

Symbol Lookup
IndexesChangePrice
DJIA-33.4512,598.55
NASDAQ-19.722,874.04
S&P 500-5.861,324.80

Last updated: May 16, 2012: 07:17 PM

Hot Stocks

General Electric

19.00+0.60(+3.26)

Alcoa

8.49-0.22(-2.53)

Apple Inc

546.075-7.095(-1.28)

Google Inc 'A'

628.93+17.82(+2.92)

Bank of America

7.11-0.19(-2.60)

Wal-Mart Stores

59.19-0.16(-0.27)

Exxon Mobil Corp

82.17+0.38(+0.46)

Ford

10.16+0.01(+0.10)

Citigroup

26.92-0.87(-3.13)

IBM

199.73+0.69(+0.35)

Yahoo

15.28-0.12(-0.78)

Starbucks

53.02-0.32(-0.60)

Microsoft

29.90-0.31(-1.03)

Home Depot

48.77+0.10(+0.21)

DailyFinance Headlines

Benzinga Headlines

TheFlyOnTheWall.com Headlines

BioHealth Investor Headlines

WalletPop Headlines

DailyFinance BlackBerry App

My Portfolios

Track your stocks here!

Find out why more people track their portfolios on AOL Money & Finance then anywhere else.

BloggingStocks Partners

More from AOL Money & Finance

BioHealth Investor Headlines

Page Loaded in 1337210269109 ms.