On August 18 of this month, I selectively uploaded a few photos from one of the two CDs I had waiting to be Flickr-ized. "You have used 98% of your upload capacity for this month," the notice read. I couldn't even manage 10 more, even though the next weekend I took a dozen rolls at the Hood-to-Coast relay.
"Sorry," I told my friends, "I'll have to wait until September 1 to show you the photos." I emailed Flickr, I surfed the forums; there was no answer to the question, "can't you just waive the 2 GB uploading limit for Pro accounts for one month?" (Update: Flickr finally emailed me to say I couldn't upload anything more. Sorry!)
I complained to Brad Hill, Weblogs editorial director, who's been telling me for months that Flickr sucks. "Yahoo should eliminate all limits on pro and non-pro accounts, grab the entire marketplace. Few things are bigger drivers than photo sharing," he told me. "Or Google will eat its lunch."
So here's my message to Yahoo!: change Flickr, or get out of the way.
You need a revenue model, it's true, and the Pro account has worked for you thus far. I'm sure you have a million or more customers paying the $24.95 a year; and I'm one of them. $24 million, $50 million even in revenue. Oh that's so great, Caterina!
But please. Yahoo! makes $1.5 billion in revenue every quarter; that makes the Pro accounts from Flickr only a eight-tenths-of-one-percent drop in the bucket. Flickr, let's remember, has no other revenue stream. No ads. No printing revenue. Nothing.
Flickr is clearly a social play for Yahoo!, and indeed, Flickr's addictive. There's a reason I didn't simply open another Flickr account, or run over to Snapfish or Ofoto to put my photos there. I want the comments, the ability to add notes, the tags, the association with the rest of my growing photo empire (2,786 photos on Flickr and counting... once September starts). I love that I'm active in many Flickr groups, even having started several of my own to modest acclaim, and I feel oh-so-artsy by my Flickr socializing. It legitimizes me, for instance, that JPG Magazine founder Derek Powazek "favorited" one of my photos. Ooh, I get shivers just thinking about it.
Use this addiction to your own benefit, Yahoo! -- change Flickr. Remove the Pro uploading limit, greatly extend the free one. Let us go crazy, sharing photos with one another and -- here's an idea -- printing them. Snapfish has Walgreen's, maybe you can make a partnership with Rite-Aid, or Safeway, or Wolf Camera. Anyone. Just let us print our photos. Let us share our photos. And by God. Let us upload them!










Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-30-2006 @ 4:07PM
Shige said...
Unless something has changed, I believe you can print from Flickr to Target as it uses the partnership Yahoo set up.
8-30-2006 @ 7:24PM
Duncan said...
Try shrinking the size of the photos you upload prior to uploading them...how hard is that? After all, Flickr is never going to show your photo in its 8megapixel glory now, is it?
9-03-2006 @ 1:22PM
Angela said...
Duncan's right. 2GB is a lot, and I'm sure they have limits for a reason.
9-05-2006 @ 8:44AM
Ixter said...
Sarah, here is a message for you: switch to Fotki.com, get UNLIMITED uploads and stop complaining ;)
Cheers from Fotki!
9-07-2006 @ 6:08AM
striatic said...
no revenue streams beyond subscriptions, eh?
flickr is partnered with target for prints.
flickr places yahoo ads on public tag search result pages.
as for the 2gb, flickr isn't exactly the ideal data backup service and i wonder why you're trying to use it like one.
flickr SHOULD allow people to buy some kind of 'mega-pro' account for just these kinds of situations, and make it irrationally expensive.