On June 29 Google Inc. (Nasdaq: GOOG) launched its anticipated online payment system, Google Checkout, which was immediately dubbed "PayPal Killer" by some. According to this Dow Jones article, since then, the service hasn't gained much traction. Or should I add, "yet"?
The problems with Google Checkout seem to include long processing time, orders that are never filled, no phone-based customer support, a few technological problems as well as a glitch with the Checkout icons which were placed on Web sites by accident.
Sellers have also been slow to adopt Checkout and according to a survey performed by Piper Jaffray & Co. of 40 large online stores, 81% of them said they wouldn't use the service. Bad news for Google, good news for eBay. The survey also found that the control issue I mentioned shortly after Checkout was launched, is an important one to retailers, both in terms of transaction process control and customer information. Looking at the fees also, Checkout isn't always cheaper than PayPal. All this explains merchants' unwillingness to convert to Checkout and why some early partners remove it altogether (as Levi Strauss & Co. had already done).
Google found out, as others have before, the difficulty of taking on PayPal. EBay Inc.'s (Nasdaq: EBAY) PayPal is eight years old and has been the leading online payment service for quite some time now. With over 100 million accounts in 50 countries, $9 billion worth of transactions processed in Q2 2006 alone and a few thousand employees, it would be hard for anyone to take it on.
However, Google has made big strides so far. Checkout has signed up about 270 retail partners in its first two months alone and is promoting the service heavily using its AdWords advertising.
I don't think Google will just roll over. It has begun to fix certain issues -- mostly those pertaining to fraudulent orders. However, sending T-shirts and other presents to dissatisfied customers isn't going to cut it. Consumers don't like people fumbling with their money and would rather use another, more reliable, service.
GM Kills $10 Million Facebook Ad Campaign Because It Didn't Work
JCPenney's Ron Johnson: 'Customers Don't Get Our Pricing Strategy'


Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-31-2006 @ 7:36PM
David said...
I have been on both ends of PayPal for years now by accepting and making payments and I can honestly say the service has terrific for me. I've had a couple of problems with paypal and it is at times frustrating but I do understand their position. Even their PayPal payments pro service is very easy all in one source to use. The fees are reasonable also if you receive a high volume or payments. They charged about 2.2% + .30 or so which beats out other competitors like Authorize.net which I have also used. You can tell i'm a big fan of PayPal but I have tried other services such as Authorize.net so there is some weight to my thoughts.
9-12-2006 @ 9:13AM
Dave said...
Why do those fools at Google try to do payments? They should focus on search. I already cannot tell if Yahoo search or Google is better. 2 years ago Yahoo search was clearly inferier to Google - not any longer.
I am a very heavy and very satisfied user of PayPal and absolutely love the service. Why can't Google be like Yahoo which partnered with the best of the breed payment service (PayPal).