Court rejects Google's appeal, Google still won't comply


Yesterday, Brian White reported on the Belgian court ruling for Google Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG). He disagreed with the ruling, saying that a) European countries tend to not adapt to trends, and b) Google only aggregates content and, as such, acts as a marketer.

Well, I must disagree with Brian. As for the first point, I wonder what made him decide that European countries aren't trend followers? Perhaps, it would be more accurate to say that European countries don't adapt to American-set trends but may have no problem with those of European origin. As for the second point, Google might very well act as a marketer, but if a site doesn't wish to be marketed, shouldn't it have that choice? Heck, if I I can ask for an unlisted phone number, why can't they?

So that was the initial ruling. But Google refused to adhere to part of it, the part that ordered Google to post a copy of the court order and all accompanying text on its website. Like a whining baby, Google called it "unnecessary and disproportionate." Brian White claims there is no law that should make Google post the ruling. My understanding is that anytime there is a court ruling, it becomes binding.

In any event, I find it odd, for a company that touts itself as becoming the world's knowledge database, that it of all companies should refuse to post the ruling. For a company that never asks permission to post anything and wants to post everything, choosing this one document to hide strikes me as opportunistic.

So Google appealed the requirement of the Belgian court to post the ruling and Google lost the appeal today.

Google plans to appeal again and, in the meantime, faces daily fines of about $640,000 for refusing to post the ruling on its Belgian home pages, Google.be and news.google.be.

Google is also planning to appeal the rest of the ruling, but it is complying to the other parts for now. Meaning, that if Google wants to publish news excerpts and small photos from Belgian, French and German newspapers, it will first have to seek permission and maybe even pay them (it pays the AP, doesn't it?).

It is quite possible Google will get permission to post these sites' content once their traffic drops, if it does, but until then, Google has been slapped and taught a lesson in humility, and I for one am happy.

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

Symbol Lookup
IndexesChangePrice
DJIA-89.2312,801.23
NASDAQ-23.352,903.88
S&P 500-9.311,342.64

Last updated: February 13, 2012: 02:42 AM

Hot Stocks

General Electric

18.875-0.255(-1.33)

Alcoa

10.29-0.35(-3.29)

Apple Inc

493.42+0.25(+0.05)

Google Inc 'A'

605.91-5.55(-0.91)

Bank of America

8.07-0.11(-1.34)

Wal-Mart Stores

61.90-0.06(-0.10)

Exxon Mobil Corp

83.80-1.08(-1.27)

Ford

12.44-0.25(-1.97)

Citigroup

32.925-0.735(-2.18)

IBM

192.42-0.71(-0.37)

Yahoo

16.14+0.14(+0.88)

Starbucks

48.82-0.38(-0.77)

Microsoft

30.495-0.275(-0.89)

Home Depot

45.33+0.06(+0.13)

DailyFinance Headlines

Benzinga Headlines

TheFlyOnTheWall.com Headlines

    BioHealth Investor Headlines

    WalletPop Headlines

    DailyFinance BlackBerry App

    My Portfolios

    Track your stocks here!

    Find out why more people track their portfolios on AOL Money & Finance then anywhere else.

    BloggingStocks Partners

    More from AOL Money & Finance

    BioHealth Investor Headlines

    Page Loaded in 1329118926916 ms.