Having addressed some controversial issues like eBay and the real estate market through a series of posts, one of BloggingStocks most avid (and astute) readers asked me to tackle another tough issue -- Immigration reform.
He directed me to the following September 15 2006 article, "Immigration Raid Makes a Ghost Town." The story points out :
"Last month, the federal government reported that Georgia had the fastest-growing illegal immigrant population in the country. The number more than doubled from an estimated 220,000 in 2000 to 470,000 last year. This year, state lawmakers passed some of the nation's toughest measures targeting illegal immigrants, and Republican Gov. Sonny Perdue last week vowed a statewide crackdown on document fraud."
The article is clearly slanted toward the plight of the people that were hauled away, creating the "ghost town," and is slanted against the government. In this case I may have been swayed by similar feelings, as was our reader. However, I am not one to appreciate the political polarization we create among ourselves and I do not feel this article is balanced in its reporting.
Even in the paragraph I have quoted I would not mention the political affiliation of the Governor. Some might say it is normal to do so, but I say it adds nothing to the story and only fuels the wrong fire. This story will take volumes and I do not know how much energy I have to cover it, but if you do not have your own soap box, I am more than happy to share mine. Perhaps we can thrash out what this all means.
One of the first things that I noted in the article was the use of the term illegal "immigrants" as opposed to illegal "aliens," which by itself is an indication of where one's sympathies may lie.
If I had written the referenced story I would have briefly touched upon a few related issues like; current low employment levels hovering around 5% for many years now, minimum wage rates in Georgia at the ridiculously low Federal rate of $5.15, and why this is such a big issue at this time. Are we really discussing it because of our fear of terrorism and our porous boarders or is it election year hyperbola. Do we feel over run with poor people trying to make a living taking jobs few others will take, or is it the often raised issue of the burden on government services. Some facts about Georgia can be found at http://www.dol.state.ga.us/ indicate the the following:
| Georgia Unemployment Rate: 4.6% | ||
| National Unemployment Rate: 4.6% | ||
| UI Initial Claims: 33,852 | ||
| Minimum Wage: $5.15 | ||
How does this relate to our BloggingStocks companies?
Naturally Wal-Mart Stores, Inc. (NYSE:WMT) is mentioned in the ghost town story since low wages are at issue. General Electric Company (NYSE:GE) has so many employees that perhaps it is inevitable that some are here illegally (and are undocumented) in some plant somewhere. But most of what GE does requires high levels of skill.
Apple Computer, Inc. (NASDAQ:AAPL), eBay Inc. (NASDAQ:EBAY), Google Inc.(NASDAQ:GOOG), Microsoft Corporation (NASDAQ:MSFT), Yahoo! Inc. (NASDAQ:YHOO) : I can't imagine how it affects them given the high levels of education and training that the average employee has. Perhaps one could argue there is an added burden on the health care system by illegal immigrants that raises the health care premiums of these companies, but I would not make that argument.
Maybe some of them are affected at their warehouses or distribution centers? I do not know. My own thought is that with the exception of Wal-Mart, the BloggingStocks companies are not having to deal with this issue at any appreciable scale.
Now what?
Should we continue to hold employers more accountable? The government seems to be very inconsistent in its treatment of the problem and the people. We are about to create the most massive barrier and surveillance system of all time on our southern border, will it work? Will more people be shot crossing or just recorded for some possible future court appearance. Does this have any impact on reducing the risk of terrorism? There may be a premium we all pay in higher health care costs for the presence of illegal aliens/immigrants, but is it offset by lower labor and, in particular, food costs?
Like I stated earlier, no small task to cover this topic -- I hope my energy holds up! These are important issues. Let me know what you think.
Disclosure: I own shares of TWX and do not own shares of any other company mentioned in this story.
Other recent articles:
Angel investing: Here I go again?
GOOG still FASCINATING: 90-day update on equivalency test
Microsoft needs a NEW IDENTITY: Part 2 of Micro'soft' vs Micro'hard'
Micro'soft' vs Micro'hard' -- Break it up fellas!
Sheldon Liber is the CEO of a small private investment company and the vice president for Design and Research of an Architecture & Planning firm.
Walmart's New Health Food Push: Is It Too Hard to Swallow?
Bonds Are a 'Safe' Investment: A Big Lie Gets Even Bigger



Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
9-29-2006 @ 11:45PM
Bruce Blodgett said...
Anyone who supports a guest worker program is actually supporting a minimum wage of whatever the guest workers earn (much lower than the "ridiculously low Federal rate of $5.15").
9-30-2006 @ 12:31AM
Mr. noitall said...
OK, I'll confess to being the reader who requested the illegal immigration story. Sheldon, thank you, for writing it, and thanks for calling me "astute" I think.
I agree that the Ghost Town article was somewhat slanted or bias, but I don't think it was fiction. Maybe the events were exaggerated but even if they were, I still find this sudden, selective enforcement of the law disturbing.
We (U.S.) Americans like to promote our country as being fair & just. I don't believe that after years of NOT enforcing the immigration laws, we should suddenly crack down and start arresting & deporting people. Is that "fair" or "just"? Does our country need more negative publicity? Do we want to be seen as a country that separates children from their parents? I don't think so!!
Yes, illegal immigration IS a big problem that should be solved. We live under the constant threat of terrorism and we've see the damage that only a few determined terrorists can create. And I do agree that hourly wages are being held down, and that health care & costs are being affected. I could mention some more problems, but the list would be long.
What I find most frustrating is that the problem is not even being discussed in a rational manner by the mainstream media, or our political leaders. It's seem to me that only the extreme views are being considered. We allways hear from the extreme right guy yelling "seal the borders & kick them all out", and the extreme left guy yelling "they are only taking the jobs that Americans wont do". They call that "balanced" reporting. OK, I know some rational solutions that involve compromising have been discussed , but because we have become so politically polarized, we just can't seem to move on this issue, and many other important issues.
I also believe that these immigrants are influencing our economy in more ways than most people think. I'll write some more on this topic later.
10-01-2006 @ 12:32AM
Eliz Langley said...
I believe in justice,law and order.I believe in old glory and all it stands for. I expect truth and honor. I,believe a person, word is their bond and their only as good as their word.My Grandfather, could walk into the bank of my home town and barrow money just on his word. It's true this was several years ago. But Honor, truth, justice and freedom, don't go out of style.We, all chose,the way we live our lives. The illegal Aliens,chose to illegally cross our Border. They chose to stay and to have children here. They chosed to get health care and not pay for it.They chosed to get food stamps and welfare and in ever state,the question is ask,if your an American citizen, that is on the form. Thay committ fraud. They also chose to drive a auto. drunk and or with out license. They chooes to sale drugs and or to belong to ganges.They chose to committ murder and or rape and all the other crimes. We Americans, did not sent for them, they weren't invited. In fact, in 1986. We, were told by our wonderful Government,that it was Amnesty one time only.The Border was to be protected and secured The money was approved,a program was to be in place to keep up with them.Dose all this sound like a broken recording? None of it was done, and just what went with the money? Our young adults are fighting for America, for old glory and all that it stands for. While,we at home,Wont protect it from un invited guest. It time We stode up for our Country also.Our Justice sistem and Government is going to hell,in a hand basket. The law apply's to ever one not just some. There is no one above the law. I'm sarry if this dosen't sound fair. Its the same law that we Americans obey. I'm sarry for the children,but the parents,did this to them.The Mexican Gov. has known sense the treaty,in the 1800's,their people and our people,wasen't to cross the Border. Read the treaty. Also find out for your selves about Neoconservative, Ever one has heard it at less a dozen times or more. I was realy surprised.
10-01-2006 @ 5:03PM
Sheldon said...
Eliz, You need to calm down and think through some of your emotional outburst. And in particular your comments about crime et. al. Every legal immigrant saga began with poor people searching for a better life as is the case of our south of the border ILLEGAL immigrants (on that we agree) but you go way to far. And without writing another long story here, I'll summarize by reminding you Al Capone was in the U.S. legally!
10-01-2006 @ 9:55PM
Gary E. Sattler said...
This is such a vast and powerful subject I'm surprised that there was not more response. Perhaps that's indicative of how people just don't want to deal with it. The fact is people, we better deal with it and soon. We need a real solution. The worlds greatest security barrier between California and Mexico is not a realistic solution. Besides, after four decades of working to tear down international barriers, who's stupid idea was it to put up a new one?
John Kennedy, Henry Kissinger, Jimmy Carter, Ronald Reagan and Bill Clinton all worked to the point of exhaustion in the pursuit of tearing down walls. Who do we think we are to say a new one should be constructed? And that, at the price of our reputation as a free and tolerant nation.
I'll bypass the dynamics of businesses hiring illegals. That's a very big subject and I feel it's seperate from the central issue. Suffice it to say I'm discouraged by the practice. I think it cheats all of us. I feel it's exploitation on it's surface. I think it's a crime... I really do. Businesses which hire illegals should be held accountable but it's only a symptom of the larger problem.
I've worked with Mexicans, in many different capacities. Overall I like them. They impress me as a people. Those who have become naturalized citizens share the same goals as we all do. They want to have steady jobs, raise their families, own their homes, build some savings and live in a safe and secure environment. With the obvious exceptions, they are just like me and I am like them.
When they choose to cross our borders illegally then they are criminals. That's all there is too it. It matters not what the reasons are. It's a border, there's a law. It's pretty straight forward. If you pity them to such a degree that you think they should walk in scot free, then I pity YOU and maybe you should go to their side of the border. Immigration laws are there for a reason. They were enacted as controls. They're not sanctions on individuals. They protect our safety, our health and our economy. They are to be taken seriously. Treat them with respect and high regard.
So is there a solution to this problem? I like to think so. I think the time is ripe for change. I propose a big one. If I had control of the situation and I could affect it without anyone knowing, I'd make one very big change. Mexico would become state number 51.
By drawing Mexico into the union (with their consent of course), the issue of illegal immigration from there becomes suddenly moot. The Mexican people would suddenly become instant beneficiaries of everything they're looking for. They'd be freely united with their families. They'd be on our tax rolls rather than a burden to them. They'd have access to our educational system just as we do. They'd have access to our health care just as we do. The biggest difference would be that they'd be paying our payroll taxes... just as we do.
A whole class of criminals would be wiped off the planet. Predjudices and class distinctions would be allowed to fade. Border patrol would quickly retrain to assist homeland security. The war on drugs would enter a new and brighter era. A massive pouring of cash into what used to be the Mexican economy would create economic benefits untold as we did what was needed to equalize the currency exchange. Banks would be freed from exchanging dollars for pesos. Never mind the effects on Cuba and Columbia. They can figure it out for themselves.
The last angle I'll touch on this is the language of choice issue. We all know english will never be replaced as our "operational" text. The suggestion is ludicrous in itself. And to name english as "official" is a waste of a referendum vote. My suggestion is not easy and it wouldn't be very simple, but it's workable and realistic and I think it would be very beneficial in the long run. I feel we should seek to become a fully bilingual nation with english as the operational text and spanish as a synthesized text to our daily lives. People who were fleuntly bilingual would garner a premimu value in the work force. It would take about a half generation before it became fully workable but we're already started anyway. Let's put our schools to the task.
There you have it now. Phase one of Gary's plan to liberate Mexico (again). It would be a full decade before we could allow free flow across the "border". It sure would be easier to tell the good guys from the bad guys out in the desert. We'd probably save the lives of a few border patrol also.
Give it some thought. Talk to some legislators. Find out if it's a realistic proposition. Let me know what you find out.
Blessings to ALL,
Gary
10-23-2006 @ 7:24AM
Bruce Blodgett said...
Sheldon,
If you have specific criticisms of the points made by Eliz, you need to state them. Otherwise we cannot have a reasoned debate on the issue. For example, you accuse Eliz of an emotional outburst, but fail to support your accusation.
--- Bruce Blodgett
10-01-2006 @ 11:15PM
Mr. noitall said...
I can't speak for Sheldon, but I would object to Eliz's description of illegal immigrants as drunk drivers, drug dealers, gang members, muderers & rapists.
10-03-2006 @ 3:42PM
jgo said...
I'm not a regular here. I just happened on the page via my regular searching for articles on this and related topics (I do a search on H-1B and H1b, guest-worker, guest-workers every couple days, and one on "illegal aliens" every couple weeks).
Needless to say, we've been discussing these issues elsewhere, in Monster, on various Yahoo! groups, in usenet, for years.
It comes down to a record flood of immigration -- both legal and illegal -- over the last 26 years, to depressed opportunity and compensation for those on the margins -- blacks, science and tech workers without degrees, older tech workers, younger tech workers, poor tech workers who cannot relocate themselves or continue to invest in new systems and books while unemployed... to abuse of guest-workers in the forms of low pay and suppression of complaint, to the shift from full-time permanent employment to temporary and part time gigs, cuts in benefits, etc. that have come from body shopping.
But the executives certainly love that it has allowed them to shift more income from production workers into their own pockets.
10-07-2006 @ 5:13PM
Mr. noitall said...
I'm sure if we looked at every Blogging Stock company close enough we would find that most if not all of them at least indirectly hire "illegals".
Wal-Mart has already been fined because one of their sub-contractors hired them. Most big corporations hire sub-contractors and the government either hires these companies or buys their products. Should they all be held accountable the way Wal-Mart was? If so, maybe we better start thinking about granting amnesty to ourselves. So even if we didn't invite them here, businesses here hire them and our government (for the most part) has allways looked the other way. Explain how at least 8 million illegals got here without the co-operation of our government, businesses, & most of us citizens.
The selective enforcement solution that seems to be going on now doesn't sound like "justice for all" to me, it sounds more like "justice for some". And enforcing laws that have been ignored for at least 20 years doesn't sound like justice either. I know alot of people say that amnesty fail once before, so it shouldn't be tried again, but I think amnesty for the immigrants & the businesses that hired them has to be included in any realistic solution to this problem.