More rich people in America -- a bad thing?
Earlier today, Peter Cohan wrote about the growing number of very wealthy Americans. He wondered if this is a good thing, and quickly concluded that it is.
It's hard to argue against people finding wealth and happiness in whatever way they see fit. But the details of his analysis raise a few questions. He refers to a recent New York Times piece that tells the story of a medical doctor who left medicine for Wall Street. The doctor is now fabulously wealthy, rather than merely well off. His net worth is in the $20 million range. This, Peter Cohan argues, is proof that the American Dream works. People are free to pursue any amount of education they want, and then are free to move through the labor market in any way they see fit. If a hedge fund pays more than a medical practice, then go with the money. This is simply how a properly functioning meritocratic system works, and as a result everybody is better off.
But something doesn't seem quite right here. In this interpretation, the American dream consists of highly educated people -- typically from privileged backgrounds (the doctor in the story is a Harvard grad) -- making millions working with investment capital. The fact that the country now has one less well trained doctor doesn't seem to matter. The fact that only a small percentage of the population has access to the top educational institutions is not a concern. And, most importantly, the economic condition of the majority of the population is not part of the calculus.
Using these simple points of reference, I think you can argue just as convincingly that the fabulous and growing wealth of highly educated people who work in the capital markets is in fact a loss for the country itself. As the American economy becomes more strongly oriented to making money from money, many citizens are left behind. This includes the people who 'merely' make things and provide basic human services, from auto workers to doctors. Many of these people face declining incomes and decreasing economic security. More rich people is great -- but only if you're one of them. For everyone else, it's a different story.
It's hard to argue against people finding wealth and happiness in whatever way they see fit. But the details of his analysis raise a few questions. He refers to a recent New York Times piece that tells the story of a medical doctor who left medicine for Wall Street. The doctor is now fabulously wealthy, rather than merely well off. His net worth is in the $20 million range. This, Peter Cohan argues, is proof that the American Dream works. People are free to pursue any amount of education they want, and then are free to move through the labor market in any way they see fit. If a hedge fund pays more than a medical practice, then go with the money. This is simply how a properly functioning meritocratic system works, and as a result everybody is better off.
But something doesn't seem quite right here. In this interpretation, the American dream consists of highly educated people -- typically from privileged backgrounds (the doctor in the story is a Harvard grad) -- making millions working with investment capital. The fact that the country now has one less well trained doctor doesn't seem to matter. The fact that only a small percentage of the population has access to the top educational institutions is not a concern. And, most importantly, the economic condition of the majority of the population is not part of the calculus.
Using these simple points of reference, I think you can argue just as convincingly that the fabulous and growing wealth of highly educated people who work in the capital markets is in fact a loss for the country itself. As the American economy becomes more strongly oriented to making money from money, many citizens are left behind. This includes the people who 'merely' make things and provide basic human services, from auto workers to doctors. Many of these people face declining incomes and decreasing economic security. More rich people is great -- but only if you're one of them. For everyone else, it's a different story.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
11-27-2006 @ 1:00PM
Dennis said...
maybe your right, But Not for me,n or my "UnEducated" Friends and Family members..
1. Btwn us we ave. $40k yr incomes, own a Home, kids the who 9 yards.
2. Add our wives brining in another Ave. of $20k yr = $60k yr Household income..
3. We made Priorities of the following for our Money
A. Pay off the Mortgage in 20 yrs ( not 15 or 30)
B. Save 10% of our After Expense Net Income ( ave. $2,000/yr in our IRA( Now a Roth )
C. Invest it into Mid cap Funds and let them manage it..
D. Keep the Wife in a Budget- They can Always find a Home for extra money...-LOL
All of us are now entering our Pre- Retirement Yrs ( all 60-62 ) and have our Homes paid for, made our kids who wanted to go to college, pay for 50% of it ( loans) and gave the others who didn't go, $20,000 each to do with as they pleased ( bought a Business/Franchise/etc.)
If our College kids wanted to go to Grad School? They paid for it, not us.
Btwn our Pensions and our IRA's we' look like we're going to Be albel to retire with at Least the same income vs Keep working
And when we asked our College Grad Kids about Financing like this? They didn't have a Clue! They weren't taught this Stuff..
Why not? Their Teachers didn't do it either..!
I think a course like this should be Started in HIGH SCHOOL and we would see alot more " Self Suficient People by the time they want to retire..
We did get our Local HS too Implement courses like these in the past 5 yrs after yrs. of Lobbying thru our PTA and School Districts )
As for Our Dr.'s leaving Practice? I really can't blame them... I'd be so Depressed ealing with all those "50+ Women" and all their (Important) butt Boring problems, it would drive me to drink! ( just like Seeing your Wife 20x a day with Nothing but Whining and Problems ) Not to mention loosing Faith in the Human race!
Too Dr.'s? Devote maybe 10-20 yrs to your profession and then Get out while you still have your Sanity! LOL