This year Wall Street bonuses are looking to hit a new record. Last year, they hit a record of $21.5 billion and I've seen estimates that they'll be up between 10% and 25% in 2006.
One expert, Options Group, estimates that the big winners will be investment bankers and equity underwriters and traders. Driven by a record year in mergers, investment bankers will receive bonuses 20% to 25% higher than in 2005, as will those in equity derivatives sales. The "losers" will be fixed-income proprietary traders, who will earn the same or less than they did in 2005.
This year, the best place for bonus babies is the Goldman Sachs Group (NYSE:GS), which is distributing $16.5 billion worth of bonuses among its 36,000 employees -- up 40% from 2005. While this averages out to $623,418 per full-time employee, a few traders will take home $100 million.
How can any company justify paying so much money to one person? That $100 million bonus is 2,159 times the $46,326 that the median U.S. family earns every year! Do traders really work 2,159 times harder than the average family? Are their lives really 2,159 more stressful? How can any CEO justify paying out so much money?
Here, in a nutshell, is one way to understand how those insanely high numbers are justified: The biggest bonuses are paid to the individuals whose loss to the organization would cost it the most profit. Goldman will pay $100 million in bonuses to traders who bet on the direction of the prices of oil and natural gas. This year, those traders bet correctly and Goldman made money as a result. Since half the bonus is paid in stock, Goldman's employees have benefited from the 58% rise in GS during 2006.
Goldman's CEO, Lloyd Blankfein, will do pretty well for himself too. He's slated to make $53.4 million -- 46% more than his predecessor Hank Paulsen (currently U.S. Treasury Secretary) earned in 2005. I'd say Blankfein deserves the increase. Goldman has grown faster under Blankfein than under Paulsen -- for example, Goldman's profit grew 70% in 2006, compared to a relatively slow 23% in 2005.
While its competitors have not come close to matching Goldman's performance, their bonuses are not too shabby. Lehman Brothers Holdings, Inc. (NYSE:LEH) will drop $335,441 on its employees -- 54% of Goldman's bonus pay; The Bear Stearns Companies, Inc. (NYSE:BSC) will disburse $321,740 per worker -- 52% of the Goldman level, and Morgan Stanley (NYSE:MS) will pick up the rear -- paying a bonus of $264,715 per employee -- 43% of the Goldman average.
But even though the bonuses can be sickeningly large to the the select individuals lucky enough to earn them, they do have broader benefits to the economy.
For example, with $24 billion in securities industry pay going to New York-based employees -- up 17% from 2005 -- the state and city will get their share. Specifically, $1.6 billion in taxes will go to the state and $500 million to the city. Moreover, anyone who sells high-end real estate, art, fast cars, cigars, and jewelry will benefit. So will charities -- like Robin Hood -- which is led by many of this year's bonus babies, including Blankfein.
Here are some more specific examples of how those bonuses are being spent:
- A $50,000-plus ring will soon adorn a Wall Street wife's hand featuring two canary diamonds, yellow stones that are among the rarest available;
- A New York real estate magnate wants a charter for June or July off Italy's Amalfi Coast for as many as a dozen of his family and friends, at a cost of about $175,000 per week for the boat and crew;
- Marquis Jet Partners has sold more than 100 jet gift cards in the past month -- at $185,000 a pop. One Wall Street executive bought six, one each for his wife and five kids;
- A New York beauty salon gets three calls daily for makeovers, at $10,000 to $20,000 each;
- A Fifth Avenue plastic surgeon says he gets about 20 requests a year for plastic surgery or Botox anti-wrinkle treatments as gifts; and
- One woman specifically asked for a $20,000 face lift as a gift from her husband this year, instead of clothing or jewelry.
That's trickle down economics for you!
Peter Cohan is President of Peter S. Cohan & Associates, a management consulting and venture capital firm, and a Professor of Management at Babson College. He has no financial interest in Bear Stearns, Goldman Sachs, or Lehman Brothers.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 2)
12-21-2006 @ 9:58PM
sean said...
I cannot believe that any company can justify that a CEO is worth 50 million dollars. He could be replaced with 3 CEO's at that price and then you will have 3 minds instead of one.
12-21-2006 @ 2:53PM
fred said...
they make so much money and they are so cheap.
merry chistmas! happy new year.
12-21-2006 @ 2:50PM
carson said...
Good for them. They deserve the big bucks because of all the money they make for the rest of us. No jealousy here.
12-21-2006 @ 5:17PM
Terterian Greg said...
The only problem that I have with all those bonuses is that they had no crystal balls to increase revenue for their companies. Marjority of them made so much money because oil prices went so high... I made lots of money on my oil stocks, but that does not make me smart... hell last 4 years I was losing on those same stocks...
So, my question is what happens when the company actualy lose money??? Do those guys pay back their bonuses?
Marry Christmas and Happy New Year to all of you!
12-21-2006 @ 3:14PM
Bob said...
Where do I send my resume at Goldman?
12-21-2006 @ 3:27PM
Robert Haas said...
Unreasonable and certainly unjustified immense compensation simply reinforces and drives the beneficiaries of it and their peer groups of such ill-gotten gains to continue to do the same in order to keep the money flowing. Public corporations are looted by their boards of directors to the detriment of the shareholders and society. It becomes a vicious circle of intense and selfish desire for wealth and power. So the answer to the questionable multimillion dollar bonuses to corporate executives was succinctly stated by Michael Douglass in the film “Wallstreet.” “Greed is good!”
12-21-2006 @ 4:02PM
Kirk said...
Can anyone smell greed?
12-22-2006 @ 12:31AM
jacqui cameron said...
these numbers baffle those of us who struggle to make a living yet hear we make too much money for our children to qualify for financial aid in college.Have any of these extraordinarily compensated employees offerred to help a working class kid or two pay for college?
12-21-2006 @ 4:50PM
Steve Lackovic said...
America is a capitalistic society and that always ahs been. But America and business used to be a share the wealth structure where the harder you worked and invested your time to benefit a company, the better your compensation and advancement.
NOT true in today's world, and with the sheer millions of employees who have lost their jobs and once living wages, it is beyond comprehension, that these corps. allow such unheard of compensation packages for a few, while the majority get little to nothing or worse...
This is all wrong, and we are losing our middle class and for what? Sure I have known people in the money world, and somewhere down the line, they all forget where they come from and could care less about you ro I and are the ones who buy $20million homes in Tellwostone or Grand Tetons or Lake Tahoe, etc and have 3, 4 or mrore such hoems all around the USA and own all the prime real estate to boot.
Me, I am awaiting the end of this Christmas season and the beginning of the rgeatest depression America has evers een. In time, when the smoke clears, we will see who wins or loses...
12-21-2006 @ 5:13PM
Carol Lantow said...
These bonuses are absolutely outrageous. It is corporate America run amok! And where does this money come from? Are not people investing in the stocks these companies handle? Is that money which should be coming to the stockholders rather than the executives? We need TONS more oversight of management on the part of stockholders, not tons more money for executives! Take control, investors!There is no excuse for such greed.
12-21-2006 @ 5:23PM
JB said...
Kirk, I do believe there will be a back slide in the first quarter of 2007. They always run up the market in the end of the year to make the funds show great year end returns. Then as tax day rolls around watch the market. It won't be at record highs, it will draw back oh say, 11,000 and fear will run thru all the do it yourself investors. That will be the time to be in.
12-21-2006 @ 5:50PM
gloria said...
Nobody needs to go to a beauty salon and pay $10,000 for a make over. Nobody needs a diamond ring woth $50,000. The merchants charge that because they know they can get away with it. People with these ridiculous salaries and bonuses will spend ridiculously. An ugly woman will be ugly even after paying the $20,000.
Christmas bonuses? This goes totally against what Christmas is all about. How about sending the amount of the bonus to a charitable institution on behalf of the employee? How about buying a home for a homeless person on behalf of the employee?
This is what will make someone beautiful, not the makeover or the diamond. Making a poor person happy bring much more joy than a vacation to the Amalfi coast.
12-21-2006 @ 6:09PM
Jeff said...
No wonder the rest of the world hates us.
There should most definitely be a cap on how much one person can make, unless that person is a business owner or entrepreneur.
These assholes don't deserve the $$ they are getting.
And I'm a conservative Republican, by the way.
It's disgusting!
12-21-2006 @ 6:06PM
Matt said...
Reading most of these comments, I ask one thing! Do you as consumers realize that the money you pay for services decides this. When you patronize any business instatution the profit that business makes is distributed how the business feels appropriate. But how much revenue that company makes is up to you as a consumer. The consumer determines the fair market value of a product. The more the consumer is willing to pay the higher they price there goods and services. So when you spend your next dollar decide if you can get the equal service elsewhere for LESS! Food for thought
12-21-2006 @ 6:42PM
Kalona said...
I think the best points made ....was WE the public who do business with companies that pay insane bonus's like this are the real losers. We empower this out of control beahvior and life style by not making better business choices of our own.
We need to be aware of how our money is working and who it really is working for.
For every person that has makes the choice to do business with a company that spends like this, we are the fools. We are responsible. We created the beast.
Maybe as business investment clients, we need to do a lil more homework about the whole company not just the crumbs we get as the end results.
Bottom line as individuals the responsibilty for change. They have no reason to change or give a rats arse about what we think until WE say enough and take our business to the places that does the best and uses our money wisely the way we know it should be used.
We earn no voice in this issue if we can't walk our own talk.
Mele Kalikimaka from Hawaii
Happy Holidays to you ALL :)
12-21-2006 @ 8:08PM
Steve Mains said...
As a stockholder and investor, I was not asked to approve these insane pay and bonuses. This is money looted from us small investor and belongs in my retirement account not on an Italian vacation. I can remember one time while I lost money selling a stock holding, the CEO got a payday measured in the 100's of millions!
12-21-2006 @ 6:45PM
Jerry Juhnke said...
The author of this story implies that the average bonus per Goldman Sachs employee equals $623,418. The math: $16.5 billion divided by 36,000 = $458,333. More importantly, other writers are saying that the $623,418 figure is the average total compensation per employee - a much more believable amount. I concede that it is alot of money, but it would be nice to have less sensationalism and more figures that I can believe.
12-21-2006 @ 7:10PM
Sandy said...
Over 60 MILLION Americans live on under $7.00 a day. That's not capitalism - it's groteaque. Only the Fog News right-wing nutcases can defend such a system.
Over 60 MILLION, right here, in the good old USofA.
12-21-2006 @ 7:38PM
Mr. Shocked said...
We all have our choices to become what we want to be (Yeah USA). School Teacher, Lawyer, Engineer or Stock Broker. If the choice is a Stock Broker and it yields the highest financial return, good for you, but let's not forget those who assisted in defining your success and always commit to giving back.
12-21-2006 @ 8:03PM
Butterfly said...
Most of you have contributed valid points of view on the bonus issue. I guess it really depends on where you find yourself in life or more particularly ... the level of your exposure to what's really available not only in the USA but other wealthy countries. I don't begrudge anyone receiving even "unreasonable" financial remuneration for their purported efforts. My question is ... since they said the bonus will be paid to "every employee" in these companies ... does this include the secretaries down to the maintenance personnel? If so, then I certainly have no problem ... but if not, then these jerks would not be in a position to make any so called "great financial decisions" to line the pockets of these corporations with profit. And, I agree with the comment that Wall Street today is bragging about it's high profits ... but come tax season they'll be screaming how "poor they are" ... hehehe to the IRS. Merry Xmas ... Peace To All ... It's my favorite time of the year. Butterfly