AOL Money & Finance

Wal-Mart's ad campaign is on the defensive

More

It sure looks like Wal-Mart Stores Inc. (NYSE:WMT) is going on the defensive rather than trying to do the right thing. The new ad campaign is meant to help the company's image, but this sure feels like the company is going on the defensive.

The commercials are supposed to show employees describing cost savings for shoppers, the company's charitable donations, and its efforts to provide health insurance to eligible workers. One ad is featuring founder Sam Walton, although the ad is probably leaving out the part how, I think, Sam Walton would roll in his grave if he saw how the company is being run now.

These guys still aren't getting the message from either Main Street nor from Wall Street. The company needs to make a sacrifice and essentially start over. It needs a new clean and fun image and if what I read into the commercial descriptions was remotely at all the way this is going to come out, then Wal-Mart is just making itself continue to defend the same daily routine without making real changes to its image.


The company competes on price and price only, and that is the only customer loyalty the company has. The company needs to stop trying to defend itself and make some serious changes. Wall Street has actually dealt reasonably well with lower sales and a tarnished image, so the company needs to decide that it is going to clean house and make nice-nice with the public (and ultimately Wall Street). Its old "new store roll-out initiative" hasn't gotten much discussion at all and it needs to focus on that and how it is going to make the customer shopping experience better. It is going to ultimately have to make some sacrifices to profit margins in the stages with some new initiatives and what it should really do is actually listen to some of these anti-Wal-Mart advocate points without going instantly on the defensive.

I noted before that the one CEO in corporate America that most resembled Darth Vader (at least in the public eye) was Wal-Mart's Lee Scott and that he was one of the ten CEOs that needed to go. I noted the same about Bob Nardelli of Home Depot back in December too. The board needs to gang up on Lee Scott and get him out of there, and if not, some of the bigger shareholders need to start rattling the cages with the Walton heirs to protect their billions of dollars. The CEO of Wal-Mart needs to be able to start conveying care and fun, and it is obvious Lee Scott is not going to ever be able to fit that bill.

As long as the economy isn't at the point where ALL Americans are watching expenses down to a penny, customers want "greater shopping experiences" now instead of "only lowest prices." This is really just part of the business cycle of a company that has reached a pinnacle, but it can take some steps now or can allow the business and history books use it as a case study about how it grew and grew before entering a long-haul faltering period.

This seemingly never-ending saga reminds me of the problems that were starting in 2004 when I was living in Chicago and saw the magazine cover for Conscious Choice titled Wal-Mart Ate My Neighborhood.

All of this was even before the Goldman Sachs analyst note this morning downgrading the firm's Buy rating down to a Neutral. Lee Scott needs to go.

Jon Ogg is a partner in 24/7 all St.,LLC; he does not own securities in the companies he covers.

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

Symbol Lookup
IndexesChangePrice
DJIA-154.4810,309.92
NASDAQ-37.612,138.44
S&P 500-19.141,091.49

Last updated: November 27, 2009: 07:55 PM

BloggingStocks Exclusives

Hot Stocks

DailyFinance Headlines

Latest from BloggingBuyouts

TheFlyOnTheWall.com Headlines

BioHealth Investor Headlines

WalletPop Headlines

My Portfolios

Track your stocks here!

Find out why more people track their portfolios on AOL Money & Finance then anywhere else.

BloggingStocks Partners

More from AOL Money & Finance

WalletPop Headlines