Sirius paying Stern an $83 million bonus
Sirius Satellite Radio Inc. (NASDAQ:SIRI) said that due to exceeding its pre-Howard Stern subscriber estimates for the year ended 2006 by over two million subscribers, it will pay the radio celebrity a bonus worth about $82.9 million in about 22 million shares.
This is exactly what Sirius had hoped for when it signed Howard Stern in the first place. If there was ever a radio personality to match Oprah's TV status, Stern is definitely the one. When Sirius signed Stern in 2004 for a $500 million over five years contract, it had 600,000 subscribers.
Stern's contract also provided for a bonus option. Back then the estimated number of subscribers at the end of 2006 was 3.5 million. Lucky for Stern, last week Sirius reported more than 6 million subscribers -- a sign either analysts underestimated the number, or that his impact was indeed so effectual.
Karmazin did the jig, of course, touting a successful strategy. But who's the real winner here? Undoubtedly, all the paid celebs are doing very well with payoffs from XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ:XMSR) and Sirius as that has been their strategy -- getting celebrities to attract subscribers. But are the companies better off for it?
Both SIRI and XMSR shares are down. In the last year, SIRI lost 42% of its value and XMSR 49%, underperforming the market significantly. While XM recently missed on subscriber growth, Sirius announced a first quarter of free cash flow.
This is exactly what Sirius had hoped for when it signed Howard Stern in the first place. If there was ever a radio personality to match Oprah's TV status, Stern is definitely the one. When Sirius signed Stern in 2004 for a $500 million over five years contract, it had 600,000 subscribers.
Stern's contract also provided for a bonus option. Back then the estimated number of subscribers at the end of 2006 was 3.5 million. Lucky for Stern, last week Sirius reported more than 6 million subscribers -- a sign either analysts underestimated the number, or that his impact was indeed so effectual.
Karmazin did the jig, of course, touting a successful strategy. But who's the real winner here? Undoubtedly, all the paid celebs are doing very well with payoffs from XM Satellite Radio Holdings Inc. (NASDAQ:XMSR) and Sirius as that has been their strategy -- getting celebrities to attract subscribers. But are the companies better off for it?
Both SIRI and XMSR shares are down. In the last year, SIRI lost 42% of its value and XMSR 49%, underperforming the market significantly. While XM recently missed on subscriber growth, Sirius announced a first quarter of free cash flow.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
1-09-2007 @ 2:55PM
frank said...
sirious is doing sooooo good why is it down
1-10-2007 @ 2:41PM
John Cahill said...
I think Sirius (I am a stockholder) is missing a big chance to capitalize on subscribership by not utilizing their logo-------the dog. Take a look at Geico and their giecko, and Aflak with their duck. I think some creative advertising people could hit a home run animating that dog. It's fine to reward stars for increasing membership; it's also smart to run a an effective advertising campaign------other than print media, is nonexistant so far. Maybe Mel should test the waters and inverst 20 mil along these lines. I like to make a few buck myself!
1-15-2007 @ 10:00PM
John Canestaro said...
I really wish that Sirius gave away stickers so people could stick them on their back windshield or what not. "Got Sirius?" "Get Sirius" "Sirius inside" and show the logo. Millions of people would see millions of little ads everyday.