Yesterday, Searchme, Inc., a new search company backed by Sequoia Capital, launched Wikiseek, "a vastly improved search engine for the popular reference site, Wikipedia. Wikiseek is available as a destination web site as well as inside Wikipedia as a Firefox extension. Wikiseek is based on proprietary technology developed by Searchme, which utilizes the suggestions of tens of thousands of vertical search engines to deliver more highly relevant searches. The result is a faster, richer Wikipedia search experience."
I don't know about you, but I know a few things about the Google searches I conduct. Usually, the first result (or one of the first three results), directs me to Wikipedia. Once I go to Wikipedia, I often stay there and expand my searches on that site. I like Wikipedia and the vast knowledge it contains. More than that, there have been occasions when Wikipedia was faster than regular news.
Micro Persuasion's Steve Rubel expands on this point. He finds that "Google's results feel increasingly littered with spam and irrelevant web sites." I tend to agree. He also says that Google depends on Wikipedia to supply it with quality results. Meanwhile, Wikipedia is growing in both traffic -- as it is now the 20th most visited domain in the U.S. -- and in influence, as it is cited extensively by the media. Steve Rubel thinks this is just the beginning.
I'm not sure if I'm ready to change my searches completely from Google to Wikipedia/Wikiseek, but I'm certainly aware of Wikipedia's great influence on the way I surf. At its current market leader position I doubt Google Inc. (NASDAQ:GOOG) is worried much about competitors.
But at the end of the day, if Google were to fear someone, perhaps it shouldn't be Yahoo! Inc. (NASDAQ:YHOO) or Microsoft Corp. (NASDAQ:MSFT). Perhaps it should be Wikipedia.
The Money Man Behind Rick Santorum: Who Is Foster S. Friess?
Savings Experiment: Snow Removal


Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
1-18-2007 @ 12:42PM
Dan D. said...
You say Wikipedia might replace Google as the premier search engine on the web (and I definitely agree with parts of your argument) but this completely leaves out the idea of searching for commercial goods. Will Wikipedia provide you a link to a good place to purchase, say, a new digital camera?
Regards,
Dan D.
1-18-2007 @ 2:24PM
Melly said...
Dan, absolutely. Google searches things and gives results Wikipedia doesn't. However, if many people know that for knowledge they go to Wikipedia/Wikiseek instead of Google, then Google might lose a chunk of the market.
Look at it as a vertical thing, I guess. Just like many people, when looking for finanical information, go to a finance site.
It's just a remote possibility at this point, but it's certainly something to keep an eye on.
1-18-2007 @ 7:39PM
BIKalpa said...
wow,But weird kind of experience to calculate about Google .But a nice thing to read .i really like it .
www.onlyaboutgoogle.blogspot.com
1-19-2007 @ 4:22AM
Bernard Girard said...
Google could respond to this threat by creating a new search motor devoted to sites chosen for the quality of their information. That's what they did with GoogleScholar or Googlepatents. They could build a Googleencylopedia, for instance.
1-19-2007 @ 11:55AM
John said...
I can't see anyone catching Google. They have too much of a lead and are constantly refining it and adding new features.