If you are bothered by the down-turn in the stock market perhaps you need to think longer term when you invest. In the long term the market will be up. If you are hit with a cold sweat by rapid downward movement in stock prices perhaps you have not set aside enough reserve capital to ride out the storm. You should increase your cash reserves or invest a greater amount in a mix of bond funds. You should not put long term money in short term investments, nor should you put short term money (needed in the next six months) in long term investments.
Momentum can move a market up and it can move a market down very rapidly and good companies can get caught in the "group think" which may be very irrational. If your tolerance for volatility is low then you should increase your investment diversification, trade less, use index funds and continue to adjust your portfolio using a proven asset manager if you do not have the ability to do it yourself.
Any good investment company or manager will ask you to assess your risk tolerance early in the process of setting up an account, but you should ask yourself this question even if you do not have an adviser. If you are feeling anxious about the current market you were not honest with yourself when you considered this question, or you did not address the issue at all.
At times like these I am reminded of what the economist, John Maynard Keynes, said, "The market can stay irrational longer than you can stay solvent." If you foresee potential liquidity problems in your future you should address them now; you should not hope for a turn-a-round to save you. Yes, the market will turn around, but when is the question, and you do not want to be worried about when. This is where long term thinking and value investing have a great advantage over momentum investing, technical analysis, growth stories and of course day trading.
Check out my other posts for BloggingStocks here.
Sheldon Liber is the CEO of a small private investment company and the vice president for design and research at an architecture & planning firm.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-02-2007 @ 11:37AM
Brad Kirkland said...
isnt a down turn a turnaround? On what premise do you base the statement "the market WILL turn around?"Historical Dow is 5-6k.If you look at P/E ratios,they are way outta whack-this is a uselss blog without anything to back it up
3-02-2007 @ 12:31PM
Sheldon L said...
Brad,
You understand nothing and add nothing.
1) Naturaly a "down-turn" can be viewed as a turn around...but if we are in one on the down-side than Up is the turn-around. A history of the stock market indicates being in it is better than being out of it even if you invested in 1929!
2)What history are you speaking of about P/E ratios. The DJIA has a higher P/E average than its 70 year average but not that much higher than its twenty year average.
3) The P/E ratios reflect a market with greater growth prospects than ever before and fewer competitors than ever before in large caps, and they are shrinking daily. Also there are billions more potential investors and capitalist today than twenty years ago.
If yo speak of backing up the story concept then your commentary should be backed up with more than your uninformed critique.
3-02-2007 @ 12:56PM
Brad Kirkland said...
I understand plenty,my investments are doing great and will continue to as the market declines.The rocket shot of the 90's when you could throw money at ANY stock and make money are over.There are many stocks with P/E's well above 20(which is still high IMHO).Some stocks HAVE no earnings,priced upon speculation only.This is not sound investment strategy.But per your blog,holding cash is a worse investment.As the dollar falls that cash is worth LESS.And as the govt printing presses continue to roll,the dollar will continue to fall.Once inflation kicks in,that cash in a bank at 5% will lose value as inflation will be higher.Please get a clue.
3-02-2007 @ 1:28PM
Sheldon L said...
Brad,
I appreciate the dialog because your limited perspective and swinging at shawdows allows other readers to learn.
I do not advise people to invest in stocks with P/E's of 20. If you read my other posts you will find I am a value investor and would not do that. I point to low P/E's, low P/S, P/B, solid cash flow and dividends.
Having no cash or liquidity makes no sense. Warren Buffett has your shared concern about the weakness of the dollar and still holds $37 billion in cash or short term investments.
Good luck to you. Money can be made in many ways and if you are successful and happy, great, but the advice I have given is solid, time tested and backed up by the greatest economists and investors of all time - so your your complaint is bewildering if you are an experienced investor.
3-04-2007 @ 10:05PM
Mr. noitall said...
I have to side somewhat with Brad. The statement that the market will be up in the long term , just isn't true, it's only your opinion, Sheldon. Times are changing, like I told you a while back, you have to look at what's happened over the last 25 years, and ask if this trend will continue, or if things will change. Economics conditions and the direction that the stock market takes are determined by the actions of people, it's not the same as physics. Just because it's done something for 20, 30, or 40 years, doesn't mean it's movement can be predicted for the next 10, 20 , or 30 years.
3-05-2007 @ 12:17AM
Sheldon L said...
Mr. N.
Always appreciate your commentary. Thanks you for taking the time. First, Brad is assuming I think people should be increasing their cash positions to a level that offers no reward. Second everyone has different time horizons for kids college, a house, a car, or retirement and must examine their own circumstances.
Second the market has gone up not just in the last 20 or 30 or 40 years but since the beginning of markets. Look at a 100 year chart for BUD, JNJ, or UPS; there are fits and starts, downswings, lateral periods in the market lasting for many years, but it always goes up and for a very good reason that is basic economics.
In the short run (which may sometimes be years) there are market anomalies, but in the long run the cost of goods and services must balance out with the amount of capital in circulation. You and Brad are certainly correct that if the government continues to print money or issue bonds it will affect the market negatively. No argument from me.
We could very well be in for some tough times. If they do not come immediately they will come soon enough. That said diversification and liquidity are a way to lighten the potential blow.