Will '300' controversy result in higher ticket sales?
Movies, however, are in the business of telling a story -- not history -- and a good action flick especially needs good vs. evil forces. In 300's case Spartans are good, Persians are bad; Spartans are good looking, Persians are odd looking and so on. The movie creators maintain it's a fictional account based loosely on facts.
It is no wonder then that since its opening, the movie has outraged the Iranian community in the U.S. and Canada as well as received numerous condemnations from Iran. The movie, the descendants of the Persians claim, "is part of a comprehensive U.S. psychological war aimed at Iranian culture."
This isn't the first time Hollywood films caused controversy. In 2004 The Passion of the Christ stirred just as much outrage, if not more, among the Jewish orthodox community. The movie was a great success, though, grossing $611 million worldwide.
It stands to reason then, that despite the controversy and the outrage (and probably because of it) 300 will continue to be a great success. Those who had no desire to see the movie will now be curious. Others, due to current political climate, might also go see the movie. In fact, one of the reasons Time magazine cited why the movie is going to be a huge success is due to the political and religious metaphors.
If you want to read some facts vs. fiction on the Battle of Thermopylae, here's a history professor's account, and the Persian Mirror has its explanations as well.
Related Posts
- Can Disney's Chihuahua movie continue to top box office? (Yesterday - 0 Comments)
- Viacom sets its eye on box-office fortune (8 days ago - 0 Comments)
- Will Big Brother advertising help shareholder value? (13 days ago - 0 Comments)
- Google (GOOG) extends lead in search engine market (18 days ago - 0 Comments)
- Tyler Perry comes through for Lions Gate (22 days ago - 1 Comments)











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-20-2007 @ 2:33AM
Dutchie said...
Although I agree that in general one shouldn’t react too hysterical to entertainment or art and that the Iranian government could definitely do with a more introspective approach, I do, on the other hand, find the portrayal of the characters in this movie offensive and feel that arguing that ‘it’s just a comic book’ or ‘it was a long time ago and those people are all dead’ is flawed and too easy.
Imagine for instance a Frenchman writing a graphic novel about the battle at Little Bighorn. In this book the Cheyenne Indians are all beautiful, tall, muscular, honour full men, defending their beloved country, freedom and families against an alien invader: the US army. The 7th Cavalry on the other hand is portrayed as a bunch of looting chubby Mexican-looking swastika-wearing pederasts, with General Custer the most degenerate of them all, using heroine and raping Indian baby’s. A French producer then turns it into a 100 million dollar movie, spending 90 percent of that on a visually brilliant depiction of the noble Indians slaughtering the ugly and evil Americans.
Now, would the average American:
a) Shrug and say, it’s based on a comic book, what can you expect?
b) Shrug and say, it’s a long time ago, the movie obviously doesn’t even try to be historically correct, and it looks good. Who cares?
c) Become incredibly pissed of, boycott French wine and cheese and consider nuking Paris?