AOL Money & Finance

Serious Money: GE, JNJ, PG, PEP or index funds?

More

Warren Buffett has acknowledged investing in Johnson & Johnson (NYSE:JNJ) and the Procter & Gamble Co. (NYSE:PG) in the past few years. Among all the endorsements a company could possibly get, this is better than a 5-Star rating from Morning Star and a a boooyaah! from James Cramer combined. Of course, Mr. Buffett's choices are far more limited than yours or mine, given the size of Berkshire Hathaway (NYSE:BRK.A), the vessel he is navigating that could have been included in this review as well.

I was looking once again at large, well diversified companies that are broadly held by institutions and individuals alike that most investors would generally agree are safe havens. To round out the discussion, I have added General Electric Co. (NYSE: GE) and PepsiCo Inc (NYSE:PEP). There are several others that could be added to this group but I have enough for this post's purpose.

The question is whether investors are better off buying into a few broadly held index funds or better off holding a few dividend paying large cap stocks? I am a firm believer in keeping at least half of the money you save, invested in the stock market, placed in indexed mutual funds, or exchange traded funds with low fees and low stock turnover, minimizing short term capital gains.

Simple theory here. The reason that Jack Bogle was successful with his Vanguard Funds is the power of a good idea. He allowed the average person the opportunity to invest in a diversified stock market portfolio, at low costs, with maximum stability. Something that would be almost impossible except for wealthy individuals that could afford to assemble a broad portfolio.

If you were to buy shares of the four large companies (BRK.A excluded), you would own brand names with thousands of products. GE would give you coverage in aircraft engines, water purification, power generation, airport security, medical equipment for MRIs, and finance. JNJ adds medical products and supplies for an aging population and Band-aids for youth, prescription and over-the-counter medicines, household products, home care and personal care products to name just a few. PG extends the household care and personal care products bringing a highly successful line of food products to your table. The acquisition of Gillette has reinforced its business lines and brought Buffett to your table and that is a real business buffet, pun intended. To round out your portfolio PEP extends the power of brands to the world of fast food franchises, packaged food products, ready to cook meals, energy drinks water and more.

So these four companies would provide diversity, quality management, scale, international business, enduring products (health, water, food, security) and long histories of success. They would also pay a higher average dividend than an index fund (Index 500 is 1.85% vs 2.39%), no short term gains since you are not trading, and no marketing costs or fees. All the benefits and none of the costs. So if Bogle likes low fees, he has to love no fees.

Yesterday's closing prices: GE $35.48, JNJ $61.22, PG $62.96, PEP $64.18 If you bought 50 shares of each it would cost $11,192. Not an insurmountable investment.

Disclosure: I own BRK and JNJ, as of today's date.

Sheldon Liber is the CEO of a small private investment company and the vice president for design and research at an architecture & planning firm. Check out his other posts for BloggingStocks here.

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

Symbol Lookup
IndexesChangePrice
DJIA-17.2410,433.71
NASDAQ-6.832,169.18
S&P 500-0.591,105.65

Last updated: November 25, 2009: 07:33 AM

BloggingStocks Exclusives

Hot Stocks

DailyFinance Headlines

Latest from BloggingBuyouts

TheFlyOnTheWall.com Headlines

BioHealth Investor Headlines

WalletPop Headlines

My Portfolios

Track your stocks here!

Find out why more people track their portfolios on AOL Money & Finance then anywhere else.

BloggingStocks Partners

More from AOL Money & Finance

WalletPop Headlines