
I chuckled when I read this piece on MSN Money. Brad Duke of Star, Idaho, is planning to turn his $125 million Powerball lottery winnings into $1 billion in 12 years.
The fact that that's an annual return of nearly 23% doesn't seem to bother him: "I'm a little behind. I've reached nine figures, so I made more than $15 million in just over a year. I want to reach $2 billion by the time I'm 55."
How good would a 23% annual return be? At Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (NYSE: BRK.A), Warren Buffett has achieved an annual return of 21.4%.
To help him accomplish this feat, Duke says that "I have a financial team of three people who work for me full time. Two of them have a lot of experience building real estate empires, so we're focusing part of the money on buying raw land and building commercial and residential developments."
I would like to speak with these advisers. To me, it's completely inappropriate for these people to be telling a jackpot winner that he can earn him 23%.
But the main problem here is Brad Duke's hubris. According to Bill Pomeroy, a certified financial planner in Baton Rouge, La., "Because the winners have a large sum of money, they make the mistake of thinking they know what they're doing. They are willing to plunk down large sums on investments they know nothing about or go in with a partner who may not know how to run a business."
That would seem to be the case here. Mr. Duke is 34 years old, has been working at Gold's Gym, and all of a sudden thinks he can earn better returns the Warren Buffett, arguably the greatest investor in the history of the world. Before his sudden windfall, he was obviously financially inept enough to be buying lottery tickets. And then there's this little gem from an interview with CNN Money:
Did you often buy lottery tickets or was this a one-time thing?
I played the lottery often when I won. I had developed a little numbering system. Since I've won, there's been a lot of numbering systems for lotteries all over the Internet. Before that, there weren't any. I really thought I was going to win. I even wrote it down in my journal in 2002.
How did you develop your system?
How to choose my lottery numbers started through a trial and error process. I just started playing number games with myself about how to capture the most diverse numbers. Then I looked at the most recent Powerball numbers over the last six months and took the set of 15 numbers that were most commonly coming up. My Powerball numbers were going to be those 15. So I starting messing around with it, and my number games got a little more complex and a little bigger. I was starting to win smaller amounts like $150 and $500.
So the guy who thinks he's going to earn 23% a year also thinks he won the lottery because of his "numbering system." Right.
Brade Duke would do well to read Bo Peabody's book Lucky or Smart. Peabody created Tripod.com with a Professor (whose class he had a B- in) and sold it to Lycos for 58 million dollars in stock. The stock would later get battered in the internet stock meltdown, but Peabody saw the writing on the wall long before most people in the industry. He realized that the company had no real business model, and sold all his Lycos as stock as quickly as he could and invested in real estate and Treasury Bills. Here's what he wrote about his experience: "Was I lucky? You bet your ass I was lucky. But I was also smart: smart enough to realize that I was getting lucky."
Mr. Duke: You're not an investing genius, and you're not the next real estate tycoon. Buy a copy of The Only Investment Guide You'll Ever Need, drink some decaf, and stop thinking you're going to earn 23% a year.
Walmart's New Health Food Push: Is It Too Hard to Swallow?
Bonds Are a 'Safe' Investment: A Big Lie Gets Even Bigger


Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
4-12-2007 @ 5:01PM
FRED W. said...
THIS ARTICLE IS RIGHT ON. THE PROBLEM WITH SELECTION OF NUMBERS FOR ANY LOTTERY IS THAT THE MOST POPULAR NUMBERS ALMOST NEVER COME OUT TOGETHER. YOU CAN BE FOOLED BY RANDOM GENERATORS BECAUSE THOSE GENERATORS USE A FORMULAR TO ARRIVE AT AN EVEN DISTRIBUTION OF NUMBERS AT SOME FUTURE OUTCOME POINT. THE MACHINE THAT SELECTS THE WINNING NUMBERS THAT ARE PRINTED ON THE BALLS, DOES NOT HAVE A FORMULS, SO THAT'S WHERE PROBABALITY COME IN. WHAT YOU ARE TRYING TO DO IS MATCH TWO DIFFERENT RANDOM GENERATORS OUTCOMES USING QUICK PICKS OR SELECTING YOUR OWN NUMBERS. THE SECREAT IS INTITUTION. OR DUMB LUCK.
4-12-2007 @ 10:24PM
beanspants said...
gosh, Fred W, you have no idea what you are talking about.
I guess this is technically true:
WHAT YOU ARE TRYING TO DO IS MATCH TWO DIFFERENT RANDOM GENERATORS OUTCOMES USING QUICK PICKS OR SELECTING YOUR OWN NUMBERS. THE SECREAT IS INTITUTION. OR DUMB LUCK.
But not really. with a random number generator with just ONE ticket, that is what you are trying to do.
But this guy analyzed the most common numbers, which probably lead to him buying more than 1 ticket for each lottery event. you are correct that the ball machines don't have a formula, but they might be predisposed to spit out certain numbers based on their relative positions --ie the machine uses the same number of revolutions, or same ammount of propulsion to "pick" a number, and buying several tickets using the most popular numbers could expose that flaw.
Instead of buying real estate, the guy could just dominate the lottery (ie, leverage his millions to buy millions of tickets). that would probably be easier.