Record industry clinging to physical formats
According to Billboard, the Recording Industry Association of America is pushing the major labels to "discuss whether a new physical format is needed as an alternative to the CD." Although the RIAA is attempting to make sure that any new format is shared among the labels, I can't help but wonder what the point is.
I've repeatedly noted the demise of the CD and the growth of digital sales in the three months I have blogged here. Frankly, I don't think the RIAA has the labels' best interest in mind by pursuing a new format to replace the CD. That format clearly already exists in digital downloads. Why not seriously re-invest in the CD as a marketable format, rather than seeking yet another competing format?
Remember when the CD came out? People cried out about the death of vinyl. They've been crying about the death of the CD for a while now (I'm in that group), but let's face it: Digital formats are here to stay. The MP3 and other media files that can be played on pocket devices like Apple Inc.'s (NASDAQ: AAPL) iPod and cell phones are easy to access, and though the transition from CD to digital file is slower than the switch from vinyl to CD was, it is still occurring (imagine what the iPhone may do to this situation). None of this counts to satellite radio subscribers who need neither a CD nor a portable player because their radio receiver is portable (this may be a generalization -- the few people I know that have XM or Sirius have stopped purchasing CDs and don't own MP3 players).
If the RIAA is worried about the compact disc, a new physical format is not the answer. Any new format will face the same competition with digital files that the CD is facing now. Either re-invest and change the CD or make the transition to digital files smoother.
I've repeatedly noted the demise of the CD and the growth of digital sales in the three months I have blogged here. Frankly, I don't think the RIAA has the labels' best interest in mind by pursuing a new format to replace the CD. That format clearly already exists in digital downloads. Why not seriously re-invest in the CD as a marketable format, rather than seeking yet another competing format?
Remember when the CD came out? People cried out about the death of vinyl. They've been crying about the death of the CD for a while now (I'm in that group), but let's face it: Digital formats are here to stay. The MP3 and other media files that can be played on pocket devices like Apple Inc.'s (NASDAQ: AAPL) iPod and cell phones are easy to access, and though the transition from CD to digital file is slower than the switch from vinyl to CD was, it is still occurring (imagine what the iPhone may do to this situation). None of this counts to satellite radio subscribers who need neither a CD nor a portable player because their radio receiver is portable (this may be a generalization -- the few people I know that have XM or Sirius have stopped purchasing CDs and don't own MP3 players).
If the RIAA is worried about the compact disc, a new physical format is not the answer. Any new format will face the same competition with digital files that the CD is facing now. Either re-invest and change the CD or make the transition to digital files smoother.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
5-04-2007 @ 6:04PM
Rick Cavaretti said...
Digital formats aside, I still need a physical means of storage for my extensive collection. The living room AV system is still the center of my entertainment universe, not my computer. My IPod is strictly for times when I'm not at home. And what if, like I've already had happen twice (thanks MS), my hard drive takes a dump? There goes all of my music and movie content. A CD or DVD won't self-destruct in that manner.
Secondly, we don't need another physical format, I agree we only need to focus on the present format and make sure it will always and forever be both backwards and forwards compatible.
5-05-2007 @ 7:33AM
Garrett said...
Actually, iPods already solve both of the issues you listed. While right now you swap CDs in your living room AV system, you could just as easily hook up your iPod through an auxiliary input and have access to your entire music collection. As for the hard drive dying, the iPod is basically a back up hard drive (or flash drive) of your entire music/movie collection. Things purchased through iTunes can automatically be transfered back from the iPod to the computer, and other songs/movies can be transfered back to the computer as well (although, this does require a bit more work).
Don't get me wrong. I still prefer to buy a CD rather than an album from the iTunes store. However, it's more and more rare that I have a legitimate use/need that my computer or iPod can't already meet. The RIAA needs to make sure there are still legitimate uses for CDs, otherwise digital will replace CDs altogether.
5-05-2007 @ 8:40AM
Emil J Kovach, Jr. said...
What the music industry has lost is NOT THE MUSIC, but the packaging and distribution business. The artists now deal DIRECTLY with the consumer, through downloading, and TWO things have happened. The expensive cost of the physical product, which they made a buck on, has been lost. And the distribution, and retail sale profit, has gone, well, BYE BYE. Artists will offer there product up, through downloads, and for those that still want the CD--that will be an on line product, and new artists will offer that out--direct from THIER website. Artists, and the internet have eliminated the ENTIRE PACKAGING, DISTRIBUTION, and RETAIL SALES of music. Also lost is the TRAFFIC BUILDER of physical CDs to the retail stores. The same will soon happen to the DVD market, as faster high speed internet connections are retro-fitted to the USA. Download there too. Studios will soon be sending A DIGITAL SIGNAL via satelite to movie houses, as they are retro-fitted, and THAT distribution network of the actual prints goes, well, BYE BYE also. So don't look at this as the death of music or movies, but it's the last dying gasp of an antiquated packaging and distribution system. Artists profits go up--consumer cost goes down. A lot of rich executives---retire. The internet has driven a stake through the heart of these middle men and they don't like it.