After having its YouTube site blocked in Thailand due to videos considered offensive by the country's government, and facing the specter of a lawsuit over the matter, Google Inc. (NASDAQ: GOOG) executives can sleep a little better tonight: Thailand has dropped its lawsuit against the company. The Ministry of Information's decision came after Google agreed to remove the 12 offensive video clips, which depicted things like shoes with their soles directed towards the King, which is offensive in that country.
It's unclear exactly how Thailand would have enforced any judgment its courts gave it against the company and, frankly, I'm a little disappointed to see YouTube backing down on this matter. In a letter to the country's Ministry of Information, Google wrote that "We have the deepest respect for His Majesty King Bhumibol Adulyadej. We likewise respect Thailand's law and tradition and hope that we will be able to reach a mutually acceptable resolution to the current controversy."
Couldn't YouTube have said, "We respect the King but we also respect free speech and are committed to promoting these values"? It's not the first time Google has backed down in a free speech right. It also agreed to censor its site for China, removing references to events the government there considers offensive.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
5-14-2007 @ 11:51AM
Andrew said...
Americans. Not everyone in the world agrees with your customs...therefore you should respect other peopls cultures instead of trying to adapt your own culture to ours.
5-14-2007 @ 1:08PM
John said...
Freespeech isn't going to happen worldwide overnight. I think by opening the door a little you increase the possibility of it happening down the road.
5-14-2007 @ 7:45PM
Adam said...
Hate speech is not free speech. Americans need to learn a lot more other cultures, seriously.
5-14-2007 @ 7:46PM
Adam said...
Hate speech is not free speech.
5-14-2007 @ 7:46PM
frank burns said...
I would believe that the Google Corporation respects asian cultures & events and would not knowingly seek to offend nor distort it's image towards any Nation or it's peoples. The American way of doing things is basically American and we would also give right to Google to express itself in the same fashion. The content which has appeared to be offensive to some was not deliberately aimed at any country or individual.Everything we do and say is based on it's own individual merit and we must respect everyone's views as we find them. If offense was taken then we all most humbly apologise as we were nonetheless unaware nor advised either way.
5-14-2007 @ 11:01PM
Joe said...
While I haven't seen the videos in question, I think that using the word "hate" is a little over the top. But I realise that this is a slogan and I agree with the sentiment. I think free speech is very important, but google has an obligation to be respectful (and lawful) in all of the cultures in which it operates.
I'm certain that if you look at the terms of service for youTube (or any other site on the web - including this one) they will say that no one may post material that is "offensive", and clearly in Thai culture these videos breached those terms.
5-15-2007 @ 6:00AM
Dick said...
I understand FREE SPEECH to be dialogue and/or comment to express an opinion. It is not a license to offend or trample on the sensitivities of others for whatever might be gained. Youtube needs to judge what is acceptable on its merits and not some god given right to be "American right or wrong".
5-16-2007 @ 6:04AM
Nick Halliwell said...
You have not quite described accurately how the VDO's in question are offensive. Please allow me to do this.
In Thai culture the feet are the lowest part of the body and the head the highest. So to even point to a Thai person with your feet is rude something like using the V sign. To put your foot on someone's head is deeply offensive. To make a VDO showing a foot stamping on the kings head is just so offensive its not true. I have actually seen this VDO and it has no merit what so ever, it shows some pictures of the king with crudely drawn feet coming down on his head. It is not even well done. I looks like it was simply done to offend. I believe that YouTube already has rules that say things should not be offensive.
We do not see any form of porn on YouTube and to Thai people these VDO's are in the same league as porn. I don't think this is anything to do with free speech, when almost to a man the people of this country respect and love the king and would be incensed if they actually saw the VDO.
He has reigned for 60 years and has kept the country on the straight and narrow for that whole time. He spend a great deal of his time helping the rural poor of the country, making there lives better.
I have see comparisons to the Thai King and the US president. There are simply none that can be made. Bush is out for all he can get whilst the King is out for all he can give.
America does not rule the world and American values are not the values that are held in Thailand or in fact any part of Asia, so stop telling people what to do and respect other nations views and the way that they want they do things.
5-20-2007 @ 7:42PM
Paul DePace said...
Free speech is not a license to insult and degrade. Free speech advocates seem to think that freedom of speech should mean a blank check to offend, disgust, and afront others. It is not, and that was never then intention. Advocates like to rest on the thought that if ANY line is drawn, that means the whole freedom of speech house will come down like a house of cards. That is baloney. If you want to align yourself with Howard Stern go ahead. But count me out. And count me out on anything offensive to other cultures. We have enough enemies as it is...