In yesterday's lunch with General Electric Co. (NYSE: GE) CFO Keith Sherin, the discussion addressed a wide variety of issues regarding the way GE thinks about managing its portfolio of businesses. My overall conclusion is that GE has a rigorous process for deciding what to keep and what to sell but as an investor I wish it was more transparent about how it makes those decisions.
Here are some of the nuggets of insight about GE which I found particularly interesting:
- At the beginning of current CEO Jeff Immelt's reign, GE was trading at a Price/Earnings ratio of 40 -- it now trades at roughly half that level
- GE goes through an annual process of evaluating each of its businesses to assess whether to keep or sell them. In so doing, GE analyzes the profit potential of the industry, GE's competitive position, whether GE is "the best steward" to run the business in a "shareholder-friendly" way, whether the business can achieve its goals, and whether there are opportunities to invest capital at high rates of return.
- GE expects its businesses to earn returns on average total capital (ROTC) exceeding 20%
- GE has used this process to restructure its portfolio -- selling businesses -- most notably it is in the process of selling GE Plastic to a Saudi Arabian company (GE could not get access to petrochemical raw materials at attractive prices) and it spun out its insurance business as Genworth (GE did not like being exposed to hurricane risks every year).
- GE has acquired $80 billion worth of businesses since Immelt took over
- Although revenues in GE Healthcare are down in the first half of 2007 due to a drop in Medicare reimbursement rates for some of its products, Sherin thinks that new technology will emerge in the next few years which will boost its revenues.
- Despite being the fourth-ranked network, Sherin estimates that GE's NBC Universal is worth between $40 billion and $45 billion.
- GE's Appliance business earns a 70% ROTC because its assets are heavily depreciated and it outsources manufacturing to China while doing product design and marketing itself.
If I managed GE, I would try to find one huge investment trend on which to focus. I think that trend could be the huge boom in infrastructure investment by countries such as Saudi Arabia, Russia, and China. These countries were made wealthy by the increase in the price of oil and are seeking to develop their economies. GE seems to enjoy a competitive advantage in businesses like energy, aircraft engines, water, and commercial finance.
Why not focus on these and exit the rest?
---
This is the second in a series of posts following a lunch I and fellow blogger Jon Ogg had with GE's CFO Keith Sherin:
- The first post examined NBC Universal and the surprisingly high valuation of between $40 billion and $45 billion.
- The third post discusses GE as an investment play on emerging markets infrastructure buildout
Peter Cohan is president of Peter S. Cohan & Associates. He also teaches management at Babson College and edits The Cohan Letter. He owns General Electric stock.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-25-2007 @ 11:55AM
Bruce E Warnock said...
We are long time GE shareholders and look back at the year 2000 and the stock at $60 with dismay. That was when Jack Welch retired and his successor Jeff Immelt has been the "captain" that presided over that stunning drop in PE you mention.
It is high time for the GE Board of Directors to separate the position of CEO and Chairman of the Board. Then they can also do an annual independent review of the CEO to see if he meets all their goals.
GE is a fine company with great infrastructure and medical products and should concentrate on what got them there. Immelt's purchase of that sub prime mortgage company is just another example of his questionable leadership. Now he wants to "sell" it.
I fully agree with you that GE needs to part with those operations that do not fit into its great core businesses, and that includes NBC.