Nardelli did serious damage to HD. He will do bigger damage Chrysler. I guess Chrysler will go out of business. The buy out group must plan on selling off the company in pieces, maybe shipping machinery to China. Of all the poor choices that could have been made this one is the worst possible.

I absolutely agree that Nardelli is the worst choice they could have taken to try and turn Chrysler around. He was a horrible CEO for Home Depot which is still suffering the backlash of his alleged leadership.

As for Chrysler, the only thing that will save them is to begin building some realistic cars that deal with today's environmental issues and ever rising gasoline prices. These overrated, overpriced hot rods they have produced in the last 10 years suffer from distinct lack of quality, engineering, and just all around poor choices for the consumer.

With 20 years of Fortune 50 experience and an MBA I cannot get a job at Home Depot because I have no retail experience, but Nardelli can get the CEO job at Chrysler with NO auto and NO union experience?!?!

If you have any Chrysler stock, better sell it now. If you have any doubts, talk to Home Depot employees

I think Nardelli is a great choice for Chrysler.A previous email stated that a division that Bob Nardelli created at Home Depot is being sold for over 10 BILLION DOLLARS. So, your telling me that is poor performance. You have no clue what your talking about. HD went from something like 45 Bil a year to over 80 Bil a year under his tenure. THAT IS GROWTH. And my bet is on Chrysler now buy big.

I think Nardelli is a great choice for Chrysler.A previous email stated that a division that Bob Nardelli created at Home Depot is being sold for over 10 BILLION DOLLARS. So, your telling me that is poor performance. You have no clue what your talking about. HD went from something like 45 Bil a year to over 80 Bil a year under his tenure. THAT IS GROWTH. And my bet is on Chrysler now buy big.

Chrysler has just committed a suicidal move with Nardelli as CEO.

I wouldn't hire Nardelli to clean the toilets. After the way he treated the employees at Home Depot. Just ask anyone working for H.D. under him. I drive a Dodge but will never buy another Crysler product now.

I have owned Home Depot stock for a few years and with this guy at the helm it has paid nothing. When building was going gangbusters, Home Depot built new stores with nothing to the shareholders, then building drops off and the stock drops. This man cares nothing about the shareholders and uses lame excuses why the stock does poorly. If you own stock in Chrysler you will be lucky to earn 2% a year. Good luck!

As a long time HD employee, we are still digging out from under "ole Bob". He's no bargain at ANY PRICE. HD was built by cunning and the ability to please the customer. We've gone back to that thinking and we will succeed. My customer is always FIRST and always will be. I don't think BOB knew what HD was even all about. Ever see a HD with a two story appliance center? Come see mine at store 584 in Houston. And yes, we have an elevator for the phyically challenged. We haven't lost ANYTHING to Lowe's, you obviously don't live or shop in HOUSTON!

Chrysler and all American auto maker better bwake up and build a auto that will compete with the rest in durability and ecconomy. They all can build a better gas consumtion auto maybe they are just building up gas producers or are they one and the same?????

Bob Nardelli will destroy Chrysler the same as he almost did to the Home Depot. He reminds me of the poor leadership that Lowe's is suffering under Robert Niblock and Larry Stone.

Nardelli thinks that personnel are not important and will cut key personnel from the company, further weakening the quality of products and services produced by Chrysler. I have been a loyal customer of Chrysler products, having purchased several of their vehicles over the years. I don't trust buying a Chrysler if he is in charge of the company. I fear that the quality of the product will decrease under his leadership, just as the customer service and products at the Home Depot. Margin and profit are important to any business, but quality of the workers and the products they sell are important to the repeat business.

Don't look for anything good out of Chrysler until he departs the company.

There are a few senior corporate executives that seem to think of themselves over all else. I believe Eisner and Ovitz at Disney were 2 such. When push came to shove, they took the money and ran. Same for Nardelli. At least he's not doing it to shareholders this time. Good luck with the UAW, Bob.

Jonathan Berr's analysis on Nardelli's leading Chrysler to
better-days-ahead, is right on target. I hate to admit that I couldn.t have said it better myself. But,I might add,Chrysler's only salvation now is to merge with KIA.

For reasons rooted in global factors, Nardelli's leadership
will do nothing to seriously disturb Chrysler's graceful but
inevitable end.

The idea that a CEO can seriously effect the course
of a global enterprise is a myth perpetuated by CEO's
and academics who pander to them. The micro and
macroeconomic and geopolitical forces churning Chrysler
and the auto industry are far beyond Nardelli's ability to
seriously influence. He can change the color the color
of the carpet in his office but otherwise, he is just
along for the ride.

That is not to say it will not be personally rewarding
for him.There is no personal economic penalty for CEO
failure in the modern corporation. Due to well-lawyered
hiring arrangements which pre-ordain the firing
arrangements, no CEO, no matter how egregous
his performance in the view of detractors, ever suffers
meaningful harm.

Frankly, as the comments posted indicate, it is seldom
possible to determine with any reasonable
concensus or certainty what "bad performance" is.
Too many variables and random events collide to
determine the course of success or failure.
It is the financial/management equivalent of physic's
"uncertainty principle." And candidly, in the Wall
Street's Attention Deficit Disorder environment of
the quarterly results metric, no one has the time or
interest to truly measure the CEO performance
space-time event.

CEO's -- "good"and "bad" -- surf this sea in gadfly
fashion with immunity and impunity. Short of a major
screwup that ends in prison time, there is no "failure"
as most people understand that term -- i.e., something
with negative career-impacting consequences.

As others have noted, changing CEO's is something
corporations do because they don't know what else to
do. CEO change-outs, frequently using "failed"
re-treads, creates the impression (or self-delusion)
of "doing something about the problem," when the truth
is no one has either time or inclination to identify the
problems, more less the solutions.

The reality is that the only reason there were changes
at Chrysler is that it has new owners.
Like the new owners of a house, they naturally
want to change the carpets, the drapes and redo
the kitchen & bath. In a few short years, they will
move and sell. Hopefully, they can enjoy the
house a while and make a profit on resale, before they
and their potential buyers discover the house
is in the path of a global freeway.

My wife works at Home Depot and the day they announced Nardelli was leaving they had a party to celebrate. They hated the man for his arogance and lack of leadership. They were so micro-managed by this no nothing idiot that they could not even change the thermostat in the store they had to go to H.Q. for that. He does not trust or empower his people to do their jobs.

Just because he worked at G.E. means nothing. Ever talk to people who work or have worked there. They are not known for treating their people well either. They work them to death and will cut jobs and move them overseas at the drop of a hat. Nardelli learned well from old Hatchcet Jack.

I admit im a chrysler man , but i can see the advance of new blood out of the mainstream auto makers. hiring within will only get you the same old thing that hasnt worked. nardelli has no need for tremendous assets , his goal will be to reclaim his good name. If Chrysler will pay attention to consumers and continue to build a good and lasting product. ( my last five new vehicles were chrysler and were terrifc products , d-250 X 3 , sebring convertible, durango )
Should nardelli go to the streets and see what sells to american public and ditch the damlier ( German four door sedans! ) ideas chrysler could leap forward in sales.
I have a positive feel for mr nardelli , sometimes a good shake up is what is needed to find a place to grow from for continued success ! its good to see an american back at the helm and get rid of the krouts!

Cerebus has just tarnished further the Chrysler brand by bringing in Nardelli. His baggage as a corporate 'leader' will reflect negatively on the company. Ask yourself as a consumer would you spend money for a product where management has a reputation of mistreatment of the employee in order to enrich themselves when you have comparable options. Now think back regarding Walmarts reputation and tell me it doesn't matter. I understand now why John Snow as former Secretary of the Treasury under Bush now Cerebus CEO was fired - poor judgement.

AFTER ROBERT NARDELLI FINANCIALLY RAPED HOME DEPOT THE SHOULD HAVE TAKEN HIM OUT AND SHOT HIM INSTEAD OF GIVING HIM THE JOB AT CHRYSLER. . . .

Nardelli is nothing more than another "chain saw" Al Dunlap when it comes to building anything that will last. Do you remember Al Dunlap?