New York Times (NYT) pays for bad karma over fraudulent ad
The ad, a self-serving rant about the evils of the imaginary naked short selling scandal, had no particular connection to reality and, as Weiss reported, contained at least one complete lie. The ad made a reference to Universal Express's "hundreds of employees." But according to its last 10-K, the company only has 37 employees.
Fast forward to September. After a long legal battle with the SEC, which had charged the company with selling unregistered stock and issuing false and misleading press releases, CEO Richard Altomare has been tossed and a court-appointed receiver has shut down the company's operations.
And The Times got stiffed for the ad -- In the receiver's report, the newspaper is listed as a creditor in the amount of $173,416.32.
The New York Times compromised its integrity to run an ad it never got paid for. Karma's a bitch.
Related Posts
- How can the New York Times be worth so little? Easily (42 days ago - 7 Comments)
- New York Times (NYT) lifted by earnings, 20% price hike (44 days ago - 0 Comments)
- Earnings highlights: The Q2 crunch continues (41 days ago - 0 Comments)
- Rupert Murdoch dreams of owning The New York Times (2 days ago - 3 Comments)
- CNBC hooks up with LinkedIn (Yesterday - 0 Comments)











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
10-05-2007 @ 6:40PM
polkav799 said...
hi can you call me ha'ha
10-05-2007 @ 10:57PM
Als Capital said...
Sure, but that does not shed any insight into the enormous vulnerability that the problem of naked short selling can really create. It is unfortunate that the easy money opportunities that naked short selling creates will take priority over the economic stability of our market system. Sooner or later, the extreme scenarios will occur and by then many honest and hard working Americans will be hurt, most likely in their retirement accounts.
http://mnrtrading.blogspot.com/