Everyone's cheering today the strong payroll report released by the Labor Department, but if you take a closer look at the numbers you'll understand why so many middle class folks do not think the labor market offers them any good news. While the government reported that unemployment held steady at 4.7% and 166,000 jobs were created, you must look at where those jobs were created and where jobs were lost to get the true picture.
Job growth was created in the service sector, which added 190,000 jobs - led by food services (37,000 jobs - primarily at restaurants), employment services (34,000 jobs) and health care (34,000 jobs). Job losses were seen in the higher paying manufacturing sector where 21,000 jobs were lost in October and 203,000 jobs have been lost in the last year. Employment at banks and mortgage brokers dropped 5,000 where 56,000 people lost jobs since February and more layoffs are expected as the mortgage mess continues to grow.
Richard Moody, Chief Economist for Mission Residential, also found that 21,500 jobs were lost in retail trade during October, which he said is the third consecutive monthly decline. In his October NonFarm Report, he wrote, this "is a sign that retailers are not expecting great things in the coming months."
Earnings also were flat. Just a 0.2 cent gain in average hourly wage to $17.58 an hour with no gain in the average workweek of 33.8 hours.
If you're in the top executive ranks you're pay may look good, but for the middle class these numbers don't show much hope of earning a better paycheck.
Lita Epstein has written more than 20 books including the Complete Idiot's Guide to Improving Your Credit Score due out in December.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
11-02-2007 @ 7:52PM
DANIEL BEIRO said...
The job numbers in the service sector are misleading because it has always been a big turnover sector.when people leave a job it is filled by someone who left a similar job looking for better earnings so actually there is no new job creation.It is like when they give the inflation numbers excluding food and energy the two most basic consumer expenditures you don't have a true picture.
11-02-2007 @ 8:32PM
brian kim said...
All over the world, to do employment is really hard. and nobody would take satisfaction in that low-salaried. the people was burn at present age can worry about emplyment. I was disappointed about myself
11-03-2007 @ 12:38PM
william lindblad said...
Thank you for confirming my suspicions. This report seemed contradictory as auto, finance and construction are going the other way.
12-22-2007 @ 9:30PM
Jjjaaazzzyyy said...
Lita, you have some of the best, most informative articles/blogs, you're very helpful. You seem to show the details (truth), it's so refreshing.