The New York Times added a few new wrinkles to the story of this Sunday's emergency board meeting at Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C) at which CEO Chuck Prince will reportedly resign:
-
Prince pay. He got $140.1 million -- vested stock of $87 million plus compensation of $53.1 million in his four year tenure at the top. A severance package has not been negotiated. But the 19% drop in Citigroup's stock reduced its market capitalization by $36.4 billion.
-
Why Citigroup's board finally moved. And Merrill Lynch & Co.'s (NYSE: MER) swift moves to dismiss CEO Stanley O'Neal influenced Citigroup's board to take action against Prince as did his loss of support among the troops in its investment banking unit.
The recent moves at Merrill and Citigroup suggest that corporations host a unique form of CEO politics. In both cases, the CEOs were reportedly unpopular with many of the people who reported to them. In Prince's case -- the investment banking unit did not like him. And for O'Neal, Merrill's brokerage unit was not a fan -- among others. In both cases, off-balance sheet deals created the kind of negative surprises that make directors worry about spending huge amounts of money on legal fees to defend themselves against shareholder lawsuits.
But the two differ in one respect -- Citigroup's board apparently needed the spur of Merrill's board's greater aggressiveness to take action itself. In a nutshell, protecting Citigroup's money-losing shareholders was not enough to force a change in leadership. The vanity of Citigroup's board -- not wanting to look weaker than Merrill's -- ultimately spurred it into action.
There is much about the decisions to depose CEOs at Citigroup and Merrill that I don't know. But if these boards are supposed to be looking out for the shareholders' interests, the $36.4 billion that Prince sliced out of Citigroup's market value suggests that they could have been far more vigilant.
Peter Cohan is President of Peter S. Cohan & Associates. He also teaches management at Babson College and edits The Cohan Letter. He owns Citigroup stock and has no financial interest in Merrill Lynch.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
11-03-2007 @ 11:22AM
Tom said...
What's holding the American Markets up???! Look at the current FACTS:
The dollar is the weakest in decades, significant credit problems are bombing major banks, oil is around $95 predicting a major gasoline price increase soon, home foreclosure numbers are bad and growing, housing is literally frozen and falling, grocery and energy prices are soaring with electricity and natural gas expected to go up 15-20% this winter, the huge illegal alien problem remains, medical costs are jumping, and manufacturing jobs continue to go overseas...
and we have a $12 BILLION A MONTH war full of corruption that we can't seem to win.
11-03-2007 @ 8:37PM
Parkebernet said...
At some point shareholders have to wonder what Robert Rubin does for his $25+ million salary. It's clear that he is excellent at dodging bullets by staying out of harm's way (every article seems to mention that he doesn't want to have anything to do with "operations"). But he certainly shares in the responsiblity for the calamity that has befallen the company. He obviously needs to move his ivory tower closer to the action and climb down once in a while to ask what the h*** is going on. They need the wisdom he gained from GS and the treasury department. Where was he when all of these foolish investment decisions were made? Is he brought in only for board meetings and "glad handing" important clients? If he was the last to know about all of this, what does that say about his role at Citi? For $25 million, investors deserve more accountability and investment savvy. These corporate "superstars" should also share in the financial pain and not be compensated for running the bank into the ground. Finally, how can anyone invest wisely when corporations are in the hands of people whose priority is their own compensation (which seems to be protected from any rational performance measures). Maybe if their own skin was in the game, they wouldn't be so eager to roll the dice.
11-04-2007 @ 10:29AM
Beltway Greg said...
The other shoe that is yet to drop will be the SIV's. At some point they're going to be forced to account for them. You think Citi would've learned a thing or two from the Enron debacle but that doesn't seem to be the case. Sadly, the Federal Reseve is afraid of Wall Street. The investment banks should've been forced to deal directlywith liquidity problems and not thrown an economic lifeline. By saving LTCM in the past and the big banks today we're only delaying the day of reckoning. Don't touch the interest rates again. Grow a set. Where is Paul Volker when we need him?
Beltway Greg
12-22-2007 @ 11:31AM
Up_Front said...
And awarded with fantastic sums of ill-gotten $$$ for scamming decent hard working investors. It's an outrage and downright despicable; further, these big fat slobs and their [respective] corporations ought to be held accountable for killing our country's middle-class and particularly, those further down the scale! Have a Merry Christmas.
"MONEY is a CANCER of the SOUL."