Conde Nast's magazine empire is storied, full of names that lead their respective empires. Vogue is not only the leading women's fashion title in the world, but also the inspiration for many a book, movie, and TV show. Gourmet is the formidable leader in food magazines; But today, Conde Nast announced in a brief missive that the magazine, along with its companion web site, would both be shuttered after the December 2007 issue, a sudden and final blow to a title whose audience, perhaps, had aged out of the market for aspirational goods like Wolf ranges and Vespas (the magazine's readership of nearly six million has a median age of 51, and average income of $124,582). Could the magazine's advertisers have been affected by the sub-prime meltdown? Without a home equity line of credit, you can't afford $1,700 tubular fireplaces, I expect, or anything to be found in Gwyneth Paltrow's abode.
The website still brightly reports that, if you subscribe today, you're guaranteed the Gwyneth Paltrow issue -- her Hamptons home is profiled, along with the Harlem penthouse of Starbucks Corp. (NASDAQ: SBUX) darling Marcus Samuelsson. The sense of doom hasn't yet struck Gwyneth's happy purpleness.
Also from Luxist: Are shelter magazines in trouble?
But I wonder if Conde Nast has it wrong here -- the young, edgy readership of Jezebel mourns the magazine as their favorite in the category (though they're incorrect -- House & Garden and HGTV are two entirely separate companies), and homages to editor-in-chief Dominique Browning abound. I, too, have cut many an inspiration from the glossy pages of House & Garden, where a college friend once worked; I, too, was struck by the emotion behind Browning's editorial missives.
In an industry where loyalty is fleeting and poignancy is a weakness, House & Garden was one true thing. Maybe, in the final analysis, it was just too good to be true.
Mark Zuckerberg and Priscilla Chan: A Romantic Facebook Timeline
Facebook's IPO Debacle, Day 3: Un-Friended and Dis-Liked on Wall…


Reader Comments (Page 3 of 3)
11-07-2007 @ 1:17AM
William Bischoff said...
I subscribe to House and Garden and am devastated that they won't be sending it anymore. I can't afford most of the things they advertise, but it is the basis for dreams,
and the inspiration for making many of the lovely things in my home over the years, which are my ''version'' of what I see and like,
made in their ''image''.
11-06-2007 @ 10:04PM
HGW said...
The average HG reader is in top 90% of income and home ownership is at an all time high.
It's not the target audience or the market t6hat is in trouble, it is the entire print industry. Costs to produce and mail a slick magazine like HG are outrageous, especially when compared to distribution by internet or cable. Print has to compete on ad rates with other more efficient mediums like TV and that doesnt leave enough money left over to pay the bills each month.
12-11-2007 @ 4:16PM
KSAntiquer said...
House and Garden was an institution. I think where they strayed is that they tried to be young and hip when there are already 50 young and hip mags on the rack. If they would have stuck to the tried and true maybe their core readership would have pulled them through. They will be missed.