According to the New York Times, "Kmart said yesterday that it would remove all jewelry advertised as 'lead free' from its shelves after workers at lead monitoring programs who tested the pieces found that some actually contained high concentrations of the metal."
One charm labeled lead-free was 52% lead. What is interesting here is that it raises questions about how much responsibility companies have about products that they source from third-party manufacturers.
Lululemon Athletica Inc. (NASDAQ: LULU) ended up embroiled in a minor scandal after a New York Times piece found that products the company was selling (the material in question was manufactured by a third party) -- labeled as containing seaweed -- actually contained no seaweed. While it sent the stock down as much as 9%, the share price ended up closing higher on the day of the story. Lululemon has since put out a press release refuting the New York Times claim, saying that its products actually do contain what they say they contain.
The legal issues could be murky. But these companies know that consumers aren't going to want to shop at stores in which products are labeled in a misleading way, and so they're taking steps to evaluate manufacturers' claims -- before the New York Times does.
Why do we have a weak dollar?
Holiday hiring slow for retailers
Closing Bell: What sell-off? (AIG, ABK, EPR, MBI, JAVA, ORCL, ERTS)
