In what could could be a sign of things to come, Rupert Murdoch and executives at the Dow Jones Company's (NYSE: DJ) Wall Street Journal are trading arguments in the press about the future of the newspaper's online edition.
A few days ago, Murdoch said that he planned to make the Wall Street Journal Online free, and make up for the lost subscription revenue by selling advertising on the site. Given the Journal's status as the premier financial news source, he estimated that he could increase traffic 10- to 15-fold from its current base of about 1 million subscribers.
Well some executives at the paper responded that the "The exclusivity of Journal content provides value beyond the Web site" and that making the Journal free would reduce print subscriptions and cannibalize traffic to other Dow Jones-owned sites.
My hunch is that Murdoch is right -- online advertising is exploding and the idea of a property as valuable as this newspaper getting so little traffic makes me think there's a better way. But regardless of who is right, this is a fight Murdoch will probably win. It's been said before and it's worth saying again: Rupert gets what Rupert wants.
Last updated: May 23, 2013: 06:28 PM
Hot Stocks
DailyFinance Headlines
- The Bright Spot in Target's Dark Earnings Report
- Sluggish Dow Overshadowed by Stellar Hewlett-Packard Earnings
- Starbucks Has a Plan for Cheap Coffee Drinkers
- The Apple Stock Slump Doesn't Matter as Much as You Think
- Tumblr Acquisition: What Was Yahoo! Thinking?
Benzinga Headlines
- Market Wrap for Thursday, May 23: Wall Street Shrugs Off Global Slump
- Nigeria ETF Gets Good News on Glum Day For Global Markets
- Small Cap Alert: Pacific Sunwear Has More Than Doubled in 2013
- Mid-Afternoon Market Update: Markets Turn Upwards, Ply Gem Rises
- NOAA: 2013 Hurricane Season to be 'Extremely Active'
TheFlyOnTheWall.com Headlines
- Northrop Grumman increases investment in Australia
- America's Car-Mart reports Q4 diluted EPS 92c, consensus 93c
- Procter & Gamble reaffirms Q4 and FY guidance
- A.G. Lafley rejoins Procter & Gamble as President, CEO
- Dish responds to Softbank claims in attempt to take control of Sprint
BioHealth Investor Headlines
- Shouldn’t VIVUS Raise Capital Now? (VVUS)
- Can Human Genome Really Double Its Stock Price? (HGSI)
- Alimera Implosion Analysis, What Is Next (ALIM, PSDV)
- Implosion Analysis For Targacept… What Lies Ahead? (TRGT, AZN)
- Rare Analyst Calls With Huge Upside in Vical and VIVUS (VICL, VVUS, BMY)
WalletPop Headlines
- The Bright Spot in Target's Dark Earnings Report
- Sluggish Dow Overshadowed by Stellar Hewlett-Packard Earnings
- Starbucks Has a Plan for Cheap Coffee Drinkers
- The Apple Stock Slump Doesn't Matter as Much as You Think
- Tumblr Acquisition: What Was Yahoo! Thinking?
My Portfolios
Track your stocks here!
Find out why more people track their portfolios on AOL Money & Finance then anywhere else.
BloggingStocks Partners
More from AOL Money & Finance
- Business News
- Stock Quotes
- Stock Charts
- DJIA
- Debt Management
- Loans
- Auto Loan
- Mortgages
- Taxes
- Small Business
- Earnings
- Tech News
- Stock Ticker
- Stock Brokers
- Resume Builder
- Madoff
- Historical Stock Prices
- GOOG
The 20 Most Valuable Brands In The World
Save on Spring Cleaning With a New Vacuum -- Savings Experiment


Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
11-19-2007 @ 10:24PM
francAS said...
MURDOCK IS IN THE ADMINISTRATIONS POCKET, Colon Powels son ran the fcc and then the rules changed . it use to be restricted on how much media ,a non born american citizen was allowed to control , and own , for national security purposes ,all the rules were changed under this administration ergo why FOX is all administration all the time ,, what a joke
11-21-2007 @ 4:12PM
Carlos R. Arvizu Sr said...
"While the U.S. economy faces a higher risk of recession from credit markets, housing and energy prices, and the falling dollar againt other currencies, most likely outcome, the fed funds can expect further cuts, despite what Federal Reserve Chairman Ben Bernanke , in a recent congressional appearance.
He said economic growth would "slow noticeably" in the final quarter of this year and was seen as "remaining sluggish" during the first part of 2008.
Housing weakness, higher energy prices, and the ailing dollar will weaken consumer spending with credit-market tightening, are seen as the most likely recession triggers," the report said.
Consumers will cut back sharply, sending the economy into a big hole, which is a very dangerious position to be adding to bigger problems for the economy.
The Fed lowered a key interest rate in September by one-half of a percentage point, the first cut in more than four years. The Fed followed with a quarter-point cut in late October, lowering the key rate to 4.5 percent.
At that time, policymakers hinted that the two cuts may be all that is needed to energize the economy and help it survive the fallout from the troubled housing and credit markets. The Fed's final meeting of the year is Dec. 11.
Solving the nations problems economically is vital to a healthy America. While wall street observers, may have a different opinion about the real estate market, and the mortgage credit crunch crisis taking place currently, it's vital to the economy that the Federal Reserves take action to reverse the slumpping housing market.
When, is the question that needs to be asked, by our political leaders. When is the Congress and Senate, as well as the President of the United States, going to stop the blame game and start taking decisive astion to solve the economic problems that we are now undergoing.
The Federal Reserve, shares some of the responsibility of the currrent credit crisis were in partially because that took to long to repond to market changes, along with the newsmedia.
The Newsmedia bounces off any angle it can, to grab headlines long enough to capture readership in the quest to sell their advertisers advertising. (Which by the way, is part of the problem, that is Negative Headlines that perpetuate notarity, spurs long term negativness, which is counter productive.
Let's look at the problem that perpetuated the so called credit crunch mess that is not only affecting the real estate market, but many other areas that are inter related.
I wonder why, does it take a rocket scientist to figure why we shouldn't be doing something, and that we ultimently beat ourselves into a pulp. This is also known as a prescription to disater, by allowing ourselves to be victimized by negative press.
To first solve a problem, we first need to Understand the Problem, What caused it, and What other symtoms that are taking place because of it, and What's being done to correct the problem? But most importantly, How do we fix it!
The problem as I see it, Loans that were made with easy money created by Wall Street. 100% financing, and stated income programs. Both these type of programs were great programs, that actually that helped give many first time buyers more opportunities to own part of the American Dream, yes, some of those loans were abused by a few over zellious Loan Originators, Wall Street, and a few real estate professionals.
We need to understand not every purchase or refinance was made with 100% financing.
70% of the homeowners that purchased or refinanced their home, were move up or down sizing buyers, with equity of their own, which did not require 100% financing.
Another factor in the equation is, approx. 15% of the buyers were investors or speculators, that used cash, equity, 1031 exchange or a combination, their of, to invest in property.
What all this means is approx. 15% of those buyers who purchased a home, may have used many of the programs that were offered, such as; Down Payment Assistance Programs, Bond Programs (Community Block Grants) offered by Cities and Municipalities, FHA, VA, as well as, other types of financing available, including seller financing, and yes, 100% financing. Approx. 10% to 12% may have used 100% financing, not eveyone of those loans are in trouble.
So who is in trouble? Approx. 5 to 7% of those buyers who used a combination 100% financing and stated income programs.
Now, for the rest of the story;
What other factors that added fuel to the fire, of this mess. Because the Federal Reserve took the initive in 2004, to start increasing short term interest rates (Fed Funds Rate), inflation scares, caused by the rate of appreciation due to supply and demand, the Federal Reserves controls two Key Interest Rates that control the money supply. The Discount Rate, and the Fed Funds Rate.
To slow down the fast moving rate of appreciation that could be volitile to inflation, the Federal Reserve felt it necessary raise short term interest rates 17 consecutive months by a .25%. This was enough to slow down the economy, kill the real estate market, and curtail consumer confidence to a crawl.
Like a famous boxer once said, "I shook up the World" (Mohammad Ali), that is indeed what caused this part of the mess were in. A combination of Wall Street Greed, Over Zellous Loan Originators, un educated borrowers and wait and see attitude of the Federal Reserve always take a causious approach) . Well, we'll see what happened. Many sub Prime Lenders who provided funds for 100% financing, got caught with their shorts down, because they were not anticipating values to drop.
There is another part of the equasion, that many people are aware of, and that is;
There are several High Cost States, such as California, for example that have many of these 100% financing problematic loans, that are currently or will be within the next 18 months start to recast their deferred interest.
These loans will have a problem, unless our Congressional leaders, including the Senate and the President of the United States takes deciisive action to increase the Conforming Loan Limits as well as the FHA Loan Limits.
Currently, the Conforming Loan Limits for FannieMae, and FreddieMac is set at $417,000, many of the loans that were made, are in high costs states, where the median price home far exceeds conforming loan limits. You may ask if you live in low cost areas, why should I worry about if California fails?
California has 1/5th of the United States economy. California is also facing an epedimic with our population growth, as well as an influx of immgrants, legal and otherwise.
Other factors in the equasion are, Crude Oil Prices, U.S. Dollar falling against other currencies and instability of other world economies, and the cost of war.
So, How do we fix it?
The Feds are need to take an agressive move to keep the U.S. Economy in the growth mode, they need to build consumer confidence. The only way they can do that, and they actually started, the decreasing the Federal Funds rate .75% in September 18th and October 31st., but has to be more agressive, and soon.
We need to contact your Congressional representatives and the Senate and voice this message.
The dollar is sliding, because of our so called credit crunch, and the real estate market. The Value of the United States is in our homes. It affects every aspect in.
As the dollar continue to slide against other currencies, we wil need to take decisive actions to improve the ailing dollar. Foriegn investors will see a window of opportunity to use Euro Dollars to buy in the United States, as they will get more for their dollar versus ours.
As interest rates move downward, treasury bills will be a safe resting place for nerve riddle investors with the stock market gitters cause by the volatility with crude oil.
The Saudi's have too much to lose if our dollar is not protected, and the best way to proctect is to booster the economy.
Here is the immediate fix;
1. Decrease the Fed Funds rate by an additional .50% basis point before the December 11th meeting of FOMC meeting.
2. Increase the Conforming Loan Limits, as well as the FHA Loan Limits for High Cost Areas.
3. Contact your legislators today. Contact the WHite House. Call, Write E Mails and Send Telegraphs stressing the importance.
4. Put pressure on the Newsmedia, by withdrawing any advertising media, that blatently distorts the news in the Headlines, as scare tactics to hold readership.
5. Educate the borrowers, who are taking on non conforming type Loans made by lenders that offer sub prime type loans.
Really know the your real estate market. Separate Hype from actual Facts.
In a normal market most lenders have a traditionally 3% to 5% delinquency rate.
In a Hot market, you have less. When trying to compare Foreclosure Statistics, or I should say the delinquency rates from a hot market to a more challenging, correcting market, the statistics can be misleading and is often distorted by the news.
As an example; if you had 10 defaults in a hot market, and in a correcting market you had 20 defaults, you now have a 100% increase in the amount of defaults. The newsmedia, will have you believe that the "The sky is falling." By examining your local market, you can determine the actual amounts of foreclosures.
In my market, which includes 21 Cities, from Long Beach to Whittier, from Compton to the City of Los Angeles, from January 1st to October 1st, 2007, we had a little over 12,600 homes in default and only 2,957 homeowners actually lost their home to the bank as an REO.
Just know the Facts. Yes, we have problems, but I think the newsmedia sensationalizes it, until the consumers are all confused, politicians jump on the band wagon, for a free ride, and confidences levels are shaken, sometimes, beyond repair.
Carlos R. Arvizu
Pronounced R. V. Zoo