This post is part of our Hottest Products of 2007 feature. Also check out our other Hottest Products of 2007 posts and let us know which product you think is the greatest thing since sliced bread.
On his Sirius Satellite Radio (NASDAQ: SIRI) show one morning, Howard Stern hypothesized that a vague loss of direction or sense of hopelessness is often the backdrop for someone getting a tattoo who wouldn't ordinarily have done so. (The shock jock isn't judging; he has at least two of his own.)
His theory rang a bit familiar ... when I was 26 (old enough to know better), I got some "ink" of my own. Two of my best friends were about to move away, my parents had recently relocated from our mutual hometown, and my boyfriend had unceremoniously ended our relationship. At the time, I had my lower back branded with the orange-and-blue "V" and sabers that trademark the University of Virginia, my alma mater. I did so while repeating three mantras I considered to be quite wise at the time.
First, my tattoo of choice wasn't a capricious decision ... I will always be a UVa alum, and I will remain proud of that fact. Secondly, while larger than I wanted (the artist talked me into a bigger size, noting that it would be "framed by my entire body" -- famous last words), it is in a spot not normally visible in the workplace or in a cocktail dress. Finally, as I flippantly told my friends and my displeased elder relatives, "When I'm 60 and ready to be rid of this thing, they'll have technology where I can just wipe it off, no problem."
Well ... sort of. I'm frankly doubtful such technology will truly be around in 28 years when my 60th birthday rolls around, but those who opt for tattoos these days can select "Freedom-2" ink. This new tattoo technology is made of biodegradable dyes that can be dissolved in one semi-painful tattoo-removal treatment. The one-time laser application simply bursts apart the embedded ink capsules, which break open to be safely absorbed into the body. The ink is still permanent for those willing to make a lifelong commitment, but a changed mind doesn't carry quite the price tag.
As for me, and my freedomless tattoo, I'll keep waiting for that invention I predicted in 2001. And one of these days I'll stop being surprised when people make comments about my university when I'm at the beach.
If you've had some experience with this product, let us know about it. Or if you know of something else that you think is one of the Hottest Products of 2007, feel free to tell us about that as well.
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 3)
11-27-2007 @ 7:38AM
Lisa said...
Yah...What exactly does "semi-painful" mean? I hear laser treatments feel like a continuous series of bee stings. But, I guess if you can sit through a tattoo, you should be able to sit through a laser treatment.
11-27-2007 @ 1:14PM
Suzanne said...
Isn't semi- painful sort of like being semi-pregnant?
11-27-2007 @ 2:13PM
Christine said...
I change my bedroom decor theme every 4 years, I change my clothing style every 2 years,
I change my hair color way to often. As for me, I cannot understand why would anyone want a permanent tatoo?
12-12-2007 @ 3:26PM
Franklin said...
"I change my hair color way to often. As for me, I cannot understand why would anyone want a permanent tatoo?"
Because for some people, a tattoo is not just simple decoration, like a haircut or a new dress. It's a statement about self.
I have two of them, and they both have significance that extend beyond mere decoration. I change my hairstyle, I change my clothes, but the tattoos are an expression of my core sense of self.
11-27-2007 @ 3:19PM
karen said...
I got a tatoo at age 26 also and have never regretted it. now at 54 it has faded considerablly and would likt to get it freshened up, so to speak.i do remember it as some what painful but no regrets here. I do not understand semi-painful at all....pain is pain.
11-28-2007 @ 10:39AM
Mer said...
Alan because Amanda's artwork happens to be done on peoples skin you don't consider it art? Well who are you? You obviously know nothing about the subject you so quickly turn your nose up to. I hate to judge but you come off as an angry yuppie bible thumper who had a bad experience. I've seen better art work on peoples skin than on most canvases these days. What ever your medium, who are you to judge someone else's work. Maybe they think yours is crap.
Keep up the good work Amanda, and Alan here's an idea go something productive with your time like trying to be less judgemental. I thought artists were supposed to be open-minded!
11-30-2007 @ 8:20PM
LaDonna said...
OK first of all I go to church have 13 tatoos and love them but being a "Bible Thumper" is soposto mean what? That you cant like certine things like tatoos?
11-28-2007 @ 10:49AM
Julia said...
Alan Keith Bricker--may I ask who you are to decide who qualifies as an artist? Just because you don't agree with Amanda's kind of art doesn't mean she's not an artist in her own way. Furthermore, I think trying to belittle someone's profession simply because you put yourself on a pedestal makes YOU sound arrogant. Do you believe you deserve the title of an artist because you've suffered, been critcized, or had difficult mentors? Maybe you've had such a difficult time earning your title as an "artist" because your artwork really isn't up to par? I personally find it a bit funny that you have the nerve to judge a tattoo artist when many people don't take your profession very seriously either. And as for tattoos being a "thoughtless, compulsive decision"--how would you know? Have you spoken with everyone who has a tattoo? I wanted a tattoo for MANY years before I finally got mine. So far, no regrets. Why? Because I chose something that was beautiful and meaningful to me (a treble clef, because I am completely addicted to music). But go ahead and continue judging everyone, Alan. You're an "artist," so you must be superior to all other humans--especially the ones who have "destroyed their body" by expressing themselves.
11-28-2007 @ 10:57AM
Steve Henley said...
What a pathetic argument Amanda...
Removable tattoos are like having a baby then giving it up after 10 years!?? I don't think the tattoo cares if you get rid of it.
Let's face it, tattoos have become a huge, trendy, fad. Unless you got your tattoo 25 or more years ago, then you were simply following the protocol for attempting to appear 'counterculture'. It's funny that people who tout themselves as different or alternative all look the same and follow identical trends. The reason you are so negetive about this product is that now even more people will have body art and your false perception of individuality will be in jeopardy.
By the way, if you truly consider yourself an artist, why aren't you happy for the opportunity to have your "art" displayed on more human canvases?
11-28-2007 @ 11:25AM
Lauren said...
Tattoos have been part of every culture in every area of the world for millions of years.
Its not a trendy fad, it is a way people (like me) choose to express themselves. My tattoos makes me feel better about myself, they make me feel beautiful, because it is exactly how I have wanted my body to look since I was as young as seven years old.
It is a great and ancient artform that should be respected. A tattoo is a permanent comitment.
I feel that this "dissolvable ink" is giving young people who are too impulsive at 18 to realize that a trampstamp isn't a good idea a scapegoat and an excuse to not take responsibility for their actions. Just like not putting on a condom.
11-28-2007 @ 11:32AM
Bob R said...
Isn't it going to be funny when in 60 years, our nursing homes will be filled with men and women with facial tats and body piercings? What will the care givers think? What will THEY be into?
11-30-2007 @ 8:26PM
LaDonna said...
I wondered the same thing many times myself. I worked in a nursing home and some of them looked at my tatoos with discust but some actualy thought they were neat, they still asked why I got them or dident it hurt but they liked them anyway.
11-28-2007 @ 12:15PM
lucy said...
There is such a thing as semi-painful. I'm not sure it's the correct term for the specified action, but there are different degrees of pain. That's why a doctor shows you a chart with different pain inflicted faces and ask you how much it hurts. And how about comparing the pain of a paper cut to breaking a bone? Would you then consider the paper cut semi-painful in comparison? I just think that semi-painful in this article refers to the fact that the ink is dissolved in one laser treatment and not multiple trips to have the tattoo removed.
11-28-2007 @ 1:04PM
Kat said...
Amanda, I couldn't agree with you more. Alan, I think you're a moron.
No one worth their ink would ever consider a tattoo to be disposable. I have 5 tattoos, my next one is in the works (a memorial to my grandparents), and although the small tattoo I have on my hip may not be a design I'd choose today, I don't regret it and I have fond memories of where I was and why I chose that design to begin with, and I'm more than happy to sport it forever.
Tattooing is an art that goes back thousands of years. Although some designs may be considered "fads", tattoos themselves are NOT fads. They are permanent works of art and self expression and definitely not for everyone. There are inks on the market for those that aren't worthy of making a permanent committment....they're called "Sharpies".
Laser removal is hilarious. One will go through much more intense pain only to have a scar that looks just like the tattoo. Maybe instead of ink, they should consider being branded.
Ink is earned. Pain is part of the process, but it's the permanence that makes a tattoo more special than any painting you can hang on a wall. Tattoo artists ARE artists, and anyone who thinks otherwise is an idiot.
11-28-2007 @ 1:45PM
Richard Smith said...
Semi painful as in biting down on leather to stiffle the screams, or seeing a light at the end of a dark tunnel???
11-29-2007 @ 8:31PM
PAINLESS WAYNE said...
SO TATTOISTS ARENT ARTISTS? IVE BEEN TATTOOING FOR 25 YEARS I STARTED RIGHT AFTER I GOT MY B.A IN FINE ARTS, AS A GRAPHIC ARTIST IN THE MID 80S I MADE AROUND 36K A YEAR MY FIRST YEAR TATTOOING I MADE OVER 100K AND NOW 25 YEARS LATER I MAKE 250K A YEAR. I HAVE ALWAYS BEEN AN ARTIST, BUT I CHOOSE TO MARKET MY SKILLS IN A WAY THAT MAKES BEING AN ARTIST VERY LUCRATIVE.
TATTOOS ARE NOT FOR EVERYONE, IF THEY ARE NOT FOR YOU THEN YOU KNOW, IF THEY ARE NOW IS THE BEST TIME IN THE HISTORY OF TATTOOING TO GET ONE THERE ARE MANY FANTASTIC ARTISTS WITH FORMAL TRAINING AND STERILE EQUIPMENT TO HELP YOU EXPRESS YOURSELF IN THE OLDEST FORM OF ART AND EXPRESSION KNOWN TO MAN.
THE OLD PERCEPTIONS OF TATTOOS HAVE CHANGED OVER THE LAST 25 YEARS BUT ONE THING HASNT TATTOOS ARE NOT FOR EVERYONE BUT INSTEAD FOR A CHOSEN FEW, THIS SPECIAL GROUP CAN BE DEFINED WITH ONE WORD.......OPENMINDED. REMEMBER DEATH IS CERTAIN......LIFE IS NOT,
PAINLE$$ WAYNE
SIN CITY NV. WWW.PAINLESSWAYNE.COM
11-29-2007 @ 8:37PM
PAINLESS WAYNE said...
P.S. REMBER THAT TATTOOS ARE LOVED OR HATED BUT NEVER IGNORED, THERIN LIES THIER POWER PW
11-29-2007 @ 8:46PM
PAINLESS WAYNE said...
OH, AND ALAN.......I READ YOUR PROFILE AND YOU SEEM LIKE THE KINDA GUY WHO LIKES TO RUB SALT IN HIS BUT CRACK AND GO TO THE PETTING ZOO........IF MY TATTOOS IRRITATE YOU THAT ALONE IS ENOUGH REASON TO HAVE THEM!!!
11-29-2007 @ 10:27PM
Babe said...
I myself do not like tattoos...and I know alot of friends that have them and wish they could either change them or get rid of them...I also read 90% regret it so I think it is a good thing to have the removable ones....
11-30-2007 @ 12:14AM
Marti said...
If someone wants a tattoo that can be removed easily if they desire to have it removed, then so what? It's their body, their money, and their freedom to choose.
What if this thing takes off and becomes super popular? Are there so many tattoo artists out there that are wealthy enough to turn away business because the lack of permanency bothers them? Somehow I just don't see that happening.