A review of the short interest in stocks traded on the New York Stock Exchange shows that some investors are willing to bet that shares in big financial institutions may go ever lower.
The figures from the exchange take the short interest in companies on November 15 and compare it to the numbers from October 31.
The short interest in Countrywide Financial (NYSE: CFC) moved up 5.5 million shares to 112.5 million. It was the second most-shorted stock listed on the NYSE. In the last five trading days, the stock has moved from above $12 to below $9, so traders may have already made some money. Washington Mutual (NYSE: WM) saw a sharp increase in shares sold short, up 12.3 million to 74.6 million. Trading in the stock over the last five days has made that bet look good. And, short sellers may hold their positions for a while longer, hoping for more bad news from the sector.
Wall Street's shorts also moved into positions that assume shares in commercial banks could sell off more. Shares sold short in Wachovia (NYSE: WB) spiked almost 7 million to 37 million, and the short interest in Wells Fargo (NYSE: WFC) moved up almost 6 million to 53.7 million.
If more mortgage-related write-offs come out of the financial services industry, the gambles against stocks in the sector will pay off handsomely.
Douglas A. McIntyre is an editor at 247wallst.com.
Savings Experiment: Snow Removal
The Money Man Behind Rick Santorum: Who Is Foster S. Friess?


Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
11-23-2007 @ 12:46PM
Charles B. Atkins said...
Surely most of the real estate related problems have been identified now. The lenders need to assist the borrowers that want to pay their payments but the increased interest rates have resulted in possible foreclosures. Its better to lower their interest rates to a managable rate to avoid furhter losses in the loan principal. I hope the lenders don't wait too late to assist in this recovery of assets.
11-23-2007 @ 6:31PM
Duane said...
Why is it everyone is overlooking Wall Street and Congress as root causes in this housing debacle? Was it not true that the lenders were motivated to produce more and more loans without concern with whether or not they could be repaid by marginal borrowers as they clamored for by Wall Street who packaged them into bonds for resale in a then-hot bond market? And was it not Congress who pushed equal opportunity legislation which made sure that lenders would not reject poorer minority candidates from getting loans, many of whom are now failing to make the payments? Granted the "teaser rates" were unreasonable", but the real capital loss was not suffered by people who will abondon that which they could never afford in the first place.
11-25-2007 @ 2:19PM
joelliebesfeld said...
The shorts are making a strong bet that many of the banks will cut their dividends, at least in part. Although the problems are not pretty, they are infact fairly well diffused. For example, C is facing a large write off on the one hand, but it is loaded with capital and resources on the other. It seems highly doubtful that new incoming leadership into C will cut the dividend at all. Their really does not seem to be the need and the wrath of the stockholders could be enormous. Much of the same would be true for WB, etc.
11-30-2007 @ 4:15PM
T said...
A Dividend cut is a good thing . Last time WB cut its dividend the stock rose 10%