Despite oil's climb, U.S. economy bends, but doesn't break


Gas is advertised in Chicago last month. Wall Street and academia are two fields that publish a great deal of research, albeit for different objectives and audiences.

Wall Street has a tendency to emphasize mainline research, a process that produces a great deal of specialized, up-to-the-minute research, but one that also can sometimes overlook -- even intentionally exclude -- research by niche or lesser-known researchers.

In focus: oil

One example: oil prices and the U.S. economy. Wall Street abounds in research describing oil's impact on U.S. GDP. As most investors/readers know, the current consensus holds that as oil prices rise, the U.S. economy slows, and if it rises too high it can throw the economy into a recession.


Further, numerous studies and analyses have empirically explained why the U.S. economy has slowed -- but not fallen into a recession (at least not yet) -- with the march of oil past $80 per barrel. (Oil closed Monday up 60 cents to $89.31). Previous oil shocks, in 1973-74 and 1979, preceded U.S. economic recessions.

Economists have (correctly, in the view of many) cited the nation's improved energy efficiency, oil's lower percentage of gross domestic product, and the typical American household's increased purchasing power as reasons why, despite continually high oil prices in 2007, the U.S. economy has managed to chug along, albeit at a slower pace.

Still, Wall Street may be overlooking a theory, one that may contain insights that both help explain the anomaly and that illuminate.

The Leeb Thesis

Author Steve Leeb, senior editor of The Complete Investor newsletter (subscription required), argues that the reason the U.S. economy has not fallen into a recession this time is that the current oil price run-up has been gradual, relatively speaking. During the 1973-74 oil shock, oil's price quadrupled in less than 9 months. During the 1979 oil shock, it rose 265% in a year.

In comparison, during oil's rise this decade, oil has risen 45% in 2007, and about 107% since January 2005. To be sure, those are not insignificant increases, but they are not sudden increases.

In other words, during this run-up, we haven't seen the sudden, large increase in the price of oil that characterized the 1973-74 and 1979 oil shocks (and that's the reason why, quite aptly, those events are called "shocks").

Leeb argues that this is the main reason the U.S. economy today has been able to keep growing (but the economy has slowed with oil's continued rise in 2007).

Oil Analysis:
Leeb offers considerable evidence to support his thesis, and it behooves economists and Wall Street analysts to incorporate his assumptions/projections into their models, at least as part of a research guide outlining various theories regarding oil impact scenarios. Further, in addition to economic impact studies, more research is needed as to why another oil shock hasn't occurred (at least not yet).

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

Symbol Lookup
IndexesChangePrice
DJIA+47.4512,848.68
NASDAQ+17.662,921.54
S&P 500+5.961,348.60

Last updated: February 13, 2012: 12:49 PM

Hot Stocks

General Electric

19.025+0.15(+0.79)

Alcoa

10.345+0.055(+0.53)

Apple Inc

498.20+4.78(+0.97)

Google Inc 'A'

611.67+5.76(+0.95)

Bank of America

8.235+0.165(+2.04)

Wal-Mart Stores

61.86-0.04(-0.06)

Exxon Mobil Corp

84.15+0.35(+0.42)

Ford

12.53+0.09(+0.72)

Citigroup

33.295+0.37(+1.12)

IBM

192.32-0.10(-0.05)

Yahoo

16.13-0.01(-0.06)

Starbucks

49.14+0.32(+0.66)

Microsoft

30.54+0.045(+0.15)

Home Depot

45.78+0.45(+0.99)

DailyFinance Headlines

Benzinga Headlines

TheFlyOnTheWall.com Headlines

BioHealth Investor Headlines

WalletPop Headlines

DailyFinance BlackBerry App

My Portfolios

Track your stocks here!

Find out why more people track their portfolios on AOL Money & Finance then anywhere else.

BloggingStocks Partners

More from AOL Money & Finance

BioHealth Investor Headlines

Page Loaded in 1329155350984 ms.