Why won't hedge funds bet their $2 trillion to boost Wall Street capital?


Wall Street banks such as Citigroup Inc. (NYSE: C) and Merrill Lynch (NYSE: MER) are sending their CEOs to the Middle East and Asia to restore their capital depleted by write-downs of mortgage-backed securities (MBS) and collateralized debt obligations (CDO). To raise $10 billion, for example, Bloomberg News reports that Citigroup is going back to the well of Saudi Prince Alwaleed bin Talal.

Reuters reports that hedge funds have $2 trillion -- with almost $22 billion flowing into them in November 2007 alone. With so much money in hedge funds, much of which is in the U.S., I wonder why these Wall Street banks need to go overseas for capital.

Here are three guesses:

  • Wall Street knows it can't pull the wool over the eyes of hedge fund managers. Would hedge funds demand to know how big the write-downs of CDOs and MBSs would be before agreeing to invest? Might hedge funds demand management changes before investing? Could hedge funds seek interest payments and option terms that the banks would find too onerous?
  • Oil money is so abundant that its owners don't worry as much about returns. Middle Eastern investors have benefited from the rising price of oil -- it's up four-fold since early 2001 -- so they are swimming in cash. They see how much money Prince Alwaleed made on Citigroup and they think they can get in on the same now. Moreover, they are willing to take a minority stake and be passive because they figure that if they lose their entire investment it won't matter. And the influence they get over U.S. foreign policy might be significant.
  • The U.S. government wants to avoid a direct Wall Street bailout for ideological reasons. Although the current administration seems fine with tax cuts -- which help the top 1% -- government help is not allowed to extend to Wall Street banks. That's because the administration fears an outcry by consumers who took on the subprime loans that Wall Street profited from packaging. It wouldn't look good if the administration had to bail out those subprime borrowers and Wall Street.

I think it's a big problem that the administration is selling big chunks of the U.S. banking system to countries whose strategic interests are at odds with ours. And the fact that the $2 trillion hedge fund industry is not willing to put a fraction of its capital in Wall Street's biggest banks may tell us something about how bad their balance sheets really are.

Peter Cohan is president of Peter S. Cohan & Associates. He also teaches management at Babson College and edits The Cohan Letter. He owns Citigroup and has no financial interest in Merrill Lynch securities.

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

Symbol Lookup
IndexesChangePrice
DJIA-89.2312,801.23
NASDAQ-23.352,903.88
S&P 500-9.311,342.64

Last updated: February 13, 2012: 03:56 AM

Hot Stocks

General Electric

18.875-0.255(-1.33)

Alcoa

10.29-0.35(-3.29)

Apple Inc

493.42+0.25(+0.05)

Google Inc 'A'

605.91-5.55(-0.91)

Bank of America

8.07-0.11(-1.34)

Wal-Mart Stores

61.90-0.06(-0.10)

Exxon Mobil Corp

83.80-1.08(-1.27)

Ford

12.44-0.25(-1.97)

Citigroup

32.925-0.735(-2.18)

IBM

192.42-0.71(-0.37)

Yahoo

16.14+0.14(+0.88)

Starbucks

48.82-0.38(-0.77)

Microsoft

30.495-0.275(-0.89)

Home Depot

45.33+0.06(+0.13)

DailyFinance Headlines

Benzinga Headlines

TheFlyOnTheWall.com Headlines

    BioHealth Investor Headlines

    WalletPop Headlines

    DailyFinance BlackBerry App

    My Portfolios

    Track your stocks here!

    Find out why more people track their portfolios on AOL Money & Finance then anywhere else.

    BloggingStocks Partners

    More from AOL Money & Finance

    BioHealth Investor Headlines

    Page Loaded in 1329123360129 ms.