AOL Money & Finance

Economists: Fed's 'clear and present danger' threshold met

More

Durable good orders jumped 5.2% in December 2007, well above the 1.6% consensus estimate. The U.S. Congress and the Bush Administration are progressing full-speed-ahead, albeit with some Senate tweaking, toward a $150 billion fiscal stimulus package that will, at minimum, provide a modest boost in GDP. Meanwhile, the Dow Jones Industrial Average, as the late financial talk show host and journalist Louis Rukeyser would say, amid all of the financial world's tumult and write-downs and restatements and remonstrations, has dropped... less than 15%.

With the above as backdrop, is this a time for the U.S. Federal Reserve to deviate or perhaps pause from its monetary policy easing path on the thesis that maybe there's enough stimuli in the system?

"Not on your life," economist David H. Wang said Tuesday. "The Fed's 'clear and present' danger threshold has been met and we're going to need an accommodative monetary policy for awhile." Wang argued that four factors will continue to act as contractionary affects on the U.S. economy for at least the next 6-9 months: more mortgage/MBS defaults, a renewed recognition of risk by investors, tepid job growth, and that nemesis of free world economic growth: high energy prices (primarily oil).

Further, Wang said if all four of the above variables move in the wrong direction, the U.S. economy "will be in very poor shape, including additional financial market distress." If just two factors break the wrong way, the economy barely grows or falls into a recession, he said. If only one variable worsens, the economy begins to recover.

So the Fed, which has cut interest rates four times since September 2007 -- including last week's emergency meeting in which it cut both the Fed Funds rate and the discount rate by 75 basis points, to 3.50% and 4.00%, respectively -- will have to cut again, Wang said. Further, the Fed should be prepared to lower the Fed Funds rate to 2.50% if conditions warrant, in the quarters ahead.

Inflation not paramount

Also, inflation, although still above the Fed's 1.7-1.9% comfort zone, "will continue to be monitored, of course, but cannot be the Fed's primary concern," Wang said.

Wang said that the several leading economic indicators -- industrial production, manufacturers' new orders, new building permits, and initial unemployment claims -- would need to show strength for several months before, in his interpretation, the Fed could feel safe raising rates. "And it may be awhile before those indicators in unison show prolonged strength," Wang said.

Economist Steve Affinito agreed with Wang. A self-described 'stimulus hawk,' Affinito argued that the Fed may have to take the Fed Funds rate below 2.50% in the year ahead.

"Admittedly, that would be inflationary, but in the final analysis if the Fed is faced with a functioning economy with some inflation and a non-functioning economy with slightly lower inflation, there's only one way for the Fed to go, in my view," Affinito said.

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

Symbol Lookup
IndexesChangePrice
DJIA+30.6910,464.40
NASDAQ+6.872,176.05
S&P 500+4.981,110.63

Last updated: November 25, 2009: 06:37 PM

BloggingStocks Exclusives

Hot Stocks

DailyFinance Headlines

Latest from BloggingBuyouts

TheFlyOnTheWall.com Headlines

BioHealth Investor Headlines

WalletPop Headlines

My Portfolios

Track your stocks here!

Find out why more people track their portfolios on AOL Money & Finance then anywhere else.

BloggingStocks Partners

More from AOL Money & Finance

WalletPop Headlines