You'd be hard-pressed to find someone with more respect for Warren Buffett than me, but I'm disappointed by his handling of a shareholder proposal to split shares of Berkshire Hathaway Inc. (NYSE: BRK.A).
Shareholder Robert Zetlin Sr. submitted a proposal to split shares of the class A stock to bring the value down to between $10 and $30 thousand, hoping to increase the liquidity of the stock.
Berkshire responded by getting permission from the SEC not to include the proposal on the ballot, and shareholders will not have any say in the matter.
Warren Buffett has long opposed splitting the stock and his rationale makes sense in a lot of ways. But Warren Buffett should be a paragon of good corporate governance, and good corporate governance means letting the shareholders decide the fate of their company.
Mr. Buffett owns more than 30% of the stock, and many of his disciples would join him in opposing the split. Zetlin's proposal would have almost no chance of passing, but Mr. Buffett should give it a chance anyway.
Warren Buffett bars shareholder proposal from ballot -- Why?
Posted Jan 30th 2008 5:10PM by Zac Bissonnette
Filed under: Berkshire Hathaway (BRK.A)
Closing Bell: Economic Catapult for Thanksgiving & Black Friday (WMT, TGT, GRMN, GOOG, MSFT)
Deere up on Q4 earnings performance
Reid Hoffman: LinkedIn will go public (at some point)
Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
2-02-2008 @ 10:04PM
Clint said...
No he shouldn't. Agree with Warren's decision to avoid splitting BRKA's and BRKB's. He must know what he's doing; his achievement as an investor is well known. I enjoy the fact that this stock (which I own some) is out of reach of high-volitility day traders and those who are short term investors. I see nothing but positive effects from keeping investors long-term.