As I fully expected, I've received a fair amount of comments on a recent blog post in which I proudly took a stance in favor of Exxon's court backed demand that the government of Hugo Chavez immediately ante up for the oil infrastructure which the country he leads has stolen from Exxon Mobil Corp. (NYSE: XOM). Most of the commentary was lucid and well thought out on both sides of the argument, but one particular commenter really piqued my sense of intrigue.The comment I'm referring to was an assertion that what the Chavez government has done by seizing the Cerro-Negro oil development is legal. For the purpose of this rebuttal, and because I am near totally ignorant of international law, I'm going to assume that comment was correct. Now, here comes the Devil's Advocate:
I believe that the United States government should immediately and completely nationalize all physical assets of Petróleos de Venezuela S.A., the state oil company of the Republic of Venezuela (PDVSA), which may exist within the borders of The United States of America. Any gas station, any oil truck, any pipe, hose, rail car or sea going vessel at dock which might belong to PDVSA, should immediately become the property of the citizen population of the United States. That is the essence of what Hugo Chavez has done, and socialist, progressive, leftists are saying it's alright. I'm willing to take them at their word, so let's get it done. For that matter, we should consider doing the same with Saudi Arabian physical assets on our nation's soil also. We can get our oil from other sources. Don't try to tell me that can't be done.
I do honestly believe that Hugo Chavez is a brilliant man, and I fully expect that he knows what he's doing. So in honor of his proclaimed efforts to best serve his people, I think we should follow his example and take good care of our people too. Tell me I'm wrong ... I dare ya.
I'd like to add one other side note to this rant, although it is just a bit off topic. I think you'll find this in keeping with my previous vitriolic diatribe. I propose that we are duty bound, as a nation that seeks to play fairly, to inform the government of Russia that the next time it sends one of its antique flying bombers over one of our state of the art aircraft carriers, it shall be immediately and expeditiously introduced to the cold, choppy salt water in the form of nothing more than dime sized burning shreds of aluminum and plastic ... no questions asked. After that, the Russian actions should be reported to the UN Security Council as an overt show of aggression and a threat of war against our defensive posture. Then we should seriously consider leaving the UN. They hate us there already any way. They wouldn't miss us ... much.
But of course, this is just my own patriot capitalist opinion.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
2-14-2008 @ 6:09PM
Murray said...
I agree totaly.
Chavez needs our oil money. If he decides not to ship us oil he will cause huge monetary losses and more poverty in Venezuela. He cannot afford that.
I also think our govt. should start to take steps to fight the EU's apparent discrimination of American business corporations.
We can start with a tariff on Airbus since it is being subsidized by Europian countries.
I disagree with penalizing the Saudis since they are our Second biggest Ally in the east. Israel being the first.
2-14-2008 @ 6:23PM
NickB said...
Don't agree on the bit about nationalization. Cause that's an act done by Socialist Govts and we project ourselves not be one (although we think its okay for our Govt to be like the communist Govt and interfere in how parents look after their kids and what they do to punish and discipline the kids - any way that's a different story).
We should freeze assets of all Venezuelan Govt here under a quick/swift court ruling / order and put it in an escrow account with Exxon being the beneficiary. Then negotiate with Chavez Govt.
Don't agree about doing this to the Saudis - they are one of the few who back the US and the ailing dollar as the currency of choice in the commodity market (Oil is 60% of the market and Chavez would like to make Euro the standard for Oil trade - meaning end of the US dollar dominance).
2-14-2008 @ 6:41PM
Bowdarc said...
Along those same lines, I think since Exxon is legally stealing from American citizens, we should do the same and sieze all of the assets of Exxon and apply them to the national debt or turn them over to a contract oil company to run the business at cost in order to supply fuel to the American people at a reasonable price instead of racking up outrageous profits quarter after quarter while working people can't afford to purchase gasoline.
2-14-2008 @ 6:56PM
Bowdarc said...
The US Dollar is history and will eventually be replaced by the Euro. You can count on our politicians to continue to devalue the dollar, not balance the budget and borrow from China or anyone else who will invest in US Govt obligations until everyone finally decides they've had enough and switches. Then the Democrats will blame it on the Republicans and the Republicans will blame the Democrats and the US economy will be that of a third world country.
Count on your politicians doing everything completely backwards and running their mouths as usual.
2-14-2008 @ 7:24PM
al coholic said...
The dollar has been and is still the most important currency the world has ever known. The rest of the world dances to America's financial tune and will continue to do so for the foreseable future.
2-14-2008 @ 9:07PM
Aldo said...
Bowdarc, you're a moron--but I guess you have that right. Exxon isn't stealing your money. You're addicted to oil-- and OPEC is hurting your wallet, get over it. The companies have no control over the cost of oil, so stop blaming them. I agree with equal retaliation against Chavez, but agree with Nick that we should cut the Saudis some slack for promoting our currency.
2-15-2008 @ 12:40AM
Gary E. Sattler said...
Convince me I should soften my position on the Saudis.
2-15-2008 @ 3:16AM
Alnusw said...
Mr. Sattler gets my vote for President! As far as Exxon goes, I wouldn't worry too much. Even after their losses "south of the border", their profits are still at record levels.
2-15-2008 @ 6:22AM
al coholic said...
It's hard to feel sorry for a company that, in spite of an army of accountants desperately trying to lower it, had to post 39 billion on the bottom line last year.
Oh by the way, that's the same year they said they couldn't afford to pay any more to clean up the Valdeez mess.
It's tempting to suggest we emulate Chavez but if we did we would be lowering ourselves to his standards.
2-15-2008 @ 9:58AM
jack said...
XOM does not set the price of oil get a life
2-19-2008 @ 3:22PM
EUGENE C. PECK said...
Leave EXXon alone and stop the nonsensical and constant squawking about its profits which are less than 10% on sales - much less than many other large companies are doing. You would like to kill the golden goose. Think a little bit before you get out the axe. EXXon pays taxes in an amount that is more each year than 1/2 of all taxes paid by all individual filers. Kill EXXon and be prepared to pay its "fair share" of taxes plus your own and plus any tax increases the Democrats are itching to impose if they get more control than they now have. And also, be prepared to pay more for gasoline if you kill EXXon. Eagle Eye
2-19-2008 @ 6:40PM
E. D. Alcaraz said...
Get off of our big corporations such as EXXON who do so much good for all of us by providing good products, paying lots of taxes and creating a lot of employment. We are a free and sovereign nation; let us act accordingly.
3-03-2008 @ 11:26AM
Frederick Kithcart said...
After that, the Russian actions should be reported to the UN Security Council as an overt show of aggression and a threat of war against our defensive posture. Then we should seriously consider leaving the UN. They hate us there already any way. They wouldn't miss us ... much.-- Quote
I agree .. It would be a savings of around 800 million dollars a year also.