AOL Money & Finance

Chasing Value: Newcastle managed by Fortress, a few more thoughts

More

Newcastle Investments (NYSE: NTC) logo We now own Newcastle Investment Corp. (NYSE: NCT), a CMBS lender and REIT paying about a 26% yield in several portfolios. It does not own real estate, instead it holds loans on nonresidential properties.

NCT is on record to fully fund its dividend and anticipates one billion dollars in loans to be paid off in the coming year. It is one of my 8 for 2008. See original full story: Chasing Value: Newcastle's 22% yield will reward patience.

The stock has lost two thirds of its value from its 52-week high and closed at $11.08 yesterday down further from my initial buy-in. The stock is down because of investors fears about the real estate values supporting the loans and the resemblance to residential mortgage brokers and lenders that have collapsed or suffered great losses. Neither of these issues are of concern to me. I am active in the commercial real estate markets and we have not seen appreciable reductions in the value of existing commercial and industrial property.

I also believe that Newcastle will get back the billion dollars they claim because the loans are older, written on properties that have likely appreciated greatly, and were underwritten during very different market conditions.

The problem for the stock value is that NCT makes its money by selling its loans, profiting from the interest rate spreads and the transaction fees. It then uses the recaptured funds to write new loans. Since the CMBS resale market has dried up NCT has no market for newly originated loans.

This means that when they lend out the returning billion dollars, NCT will likely have to keep the loans until such time as the CMBS resale market returns. This results in a loss of revenue from the spreads on the loan sales, and less total transactions, thus reducing fee income. Newcastle Investment is externally managed by Fortress Investment Group, which owns about 9% of the REIT. The same group now embroiled in a battle with real estate tycoon Harry Macklowe to forclose on the GM Building in New York along with other assets.

Since the stock price is based largely on anticipated future earnings and these may be reduced in the near term, investors are not willing to pay what they were in the past for the stock. Unless Newcastle finds partners to bring in additional capital, or the CMBS market returns, its lower income will mean less cash to distribute in the form of dividends reducing the current yield.

I do not fear the loan risk as some might, I just think earnings will be down for a while. However, as I have stated before, even if they were cut in half, or more, the reduced dividend yield would still be very rewarding, making Newcastle worth considering as part of a diversified portfolio.

Sheldon Liber is the CEO of a small private investment company and the principal for design and research at an architecture & planning firm. To find potential opportunities and verify my track record, read Chasing Value or Serious Money.

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

Symbol Lookup
IndexesChangePrice
DJIA+30.6910,464.40
NASDAQ+6.872,176.05
S&P 500+4.981,110.63

Last updated: November 25, 2009: 05:21 PM

BloggingStocks Exclusives

Hot Stocks

DailyFinance Headlines

Latest from BloggingBuyouts

TheFlyOnTheWall.com Headlines

BioHealth Investor Headlines

WalletPop Headlines

My Portfolios

Track your stocks here!

Find out why more people track their portfolios on AOL Money & Finance then anywhere else.

BloggingStocks Partners

More from AOL Money & Finance

WalletPop Headlines