GE's Infrastructure segment produces, sells, finances and services equipment for the air transportation and energy generation industries. It also produces, sells, and services equipment for the rail transportation and water treatment industries.
GE Infrastructure is GE's crown jewel at the moment. Its revenues rose 23%, or $11.0 billion, in 2007 on higher volume ($7.9 billion), higher prices ($1.1 billion) and the effects of the weaker U.S. dollar ($0.8 billion) at the industrial businesses in the segment. The increase in volume reflected the effects of acquisitions at Aviation and Oil & Gas and increased sales of commercial engines and services at Aviation, thermal and wind equipment at Energy, and equipment and services at Oil & Gas and Transportation.
The increase in price was primarily at Energy and Aviation, while the effects of the weaker U.S. dollar were primarily at Oil & Gas and Energy. Revenues also increased as a result of acquisitions ($0.7 billion) and organic revenue growth ($0.6 billion), primarily at Energy Financial Services and Aviation Financial Services.
Segment profit rose 22% to $10.8 billion in 2007, compared with $8.8 billion in 2006, as higher volume ($1.3 billion), higher prices ($1.1 billion), productivity ($0.1 billion), the effects of the weaker U.S. dollar ($0.1 billion) and higher sales of minority interests in engine programs ($0.1 billion) more than offset the effects of higher material and other costs ($0.9 billion) at the industrial businesses in the segment. The increase in volume primarily related to Aviation, Energy and Oil & Gas. Segment profit from the financial services businesses increased $0.1 billion, primarily as a result of core growth at Aviation Financial Services.
Based on GE Infrastructure estimated net profit of $9 billion in 2007, there is one comparable company, United Technologies Corporation (NYSE: UTX) which has a P/E of 17.2 (down from 19.4 in July). Applying UTX's P/E to GE Infrastructure's earnings forecast yields an estimated value of $153.7 billion.
I would rather have a range of comparable companies, so I welcome suggestions for other publicly traded firms to use as a benchmark.










