UAW STILL FOOLIN' GM SHAREHOLDERS
IT IS USELESS TO ASK GUYS TO KEEP BUYIING GM AS LONG AS UAW STILL SCREWING AROUND WITH GM SHAREHOLDERS.

GM SHAREHOLDRS START UNLOADING GM STOCK NOW


COME BACK LATER IF GM STILL LIVES ..
IF NOT , BYE BYE GM!!

I WILL NEVER DOOPERATE WITH YOU ANYMORE NEVER AGAIN

I HAD BEEN SUCKERED REPEATEDLY HOPING THAT THINGS WOULD GET BETTER

IT LOOKS LIKE ANTOHER DELPHI DEJAVU NOW


GM WILL BE NEXT DELPHI!!

DONT STARE AT ME


START TELLING YOUR BUDDIES


GM IS GOIN' DOWN


LIKE DELPHI


AWWWORRRRROOOO!!

LUTZ IS TALKING CROCK

UAW IS BUSY LOOTING GM AND FORD OF EVERY DIME

TOMORROW GM AND FORD WILL DECLARE BANKRUPTCY

SHAREHOLDERS WILL STRATCH HEADS..

SHAREHOLDERS ARE SLEEPY ALOOFY IDIOTS


SELL GM AND FORD NOW AND SAVE WHAT IS LEFT OF GM AND FORD


IF YOU SELL NOW UAW WILL PROBABLY STOP LOOTING, WHO KNOWS...

I AM THE HARDEST WORKING GM AND FORD SHAREOLDER

NOW I NOW THAT ANY ACTIVIST SHAREHOLDER ARE WASTING TIME


IT IS USELESS TO USE FREEDOM OF SPEECH TO EDUCATE STUPID SHARHELDERS

REALLY USELESS

JOUIRNALSITS ARE SO CLUELESS SO DONT READ ANYMORE OF THEM


WE ARE RUN NING IN CIRCLES

JUST BUY AND SELL TRYING TO MAKE A LITTLE

THIS IS WHAT IT S ALL ABOUT

NO USE READING STORIESSS....

AXLE STRIKE GM SHUTTING DOWNN

THIS IS THE CURTAIN WALL CLOSING FOR GM

YOU ARE WITNESSING GM SINKING NOW


BUBBLING BUBBLING

YOU ARE WITNESSING GM SINKING NOW


BUBBLING BUBBLING

R I P GM

NO BODY IS GIVING A DAMN HUH

THERE IS SCIENTIFIC EVIDENCE THAT THE DINOSAURS DIED OUT BECAUSE OF "GLOBAL WARMING" INITIATED BY THE "FLATULENCE" THEY PRODUCED FROM EATING GREENS. THE FLATULENCE, WHEN COMBINED WITH THE ELEMENTS IN THE SUROUNDING AIR PRODUCED METHANE WHICH ENDUCED GLOBAL WARMING.

LETS HOPE ALGORE (IT'S ONE WORD TO AS TO SAVE "WARM BREATH" WHICH MAY LEAD TO GLOBAL WARMING) KEEPS HIS MOUTH SHUT. 15 MINUTES OF HIS ORATING AND THE MILLIONS OF DINOSAURS COME OFF SECOND BEST IN THE "FLATULENCE" DEPARTMENT.

Lutz is ABSOLUTELY CORRECT. It is so refreshing to hear a REAL AMERICAN voice what the silent majority here in real world America knows. Bob, run for President, PLEASE!!!!!!

While it probably isn't wise for Mr. Lutz to talk the way he did, he is mostly correct. Global Warming is occurring, but man has had VERY LITTLE effect on it. If not for Global Warming, wouldn't we still be in the ICE AGE? If not for Global Warming, glaicers wouldn't be melting providing pure water for the majority of the worlds population, but WarMOngers only want to talk about melting glaciers and ice caps, they never mention that we only monitor/measure less than 5% of ALL glaciers, and of those we do monitor and measure, just as many are GROWING. The WarMongers talk about the THOUSANDS of tons of CO2 generated by mankind (what they really mean is the USA), but they NEVER mention that C)2 is less than half of ONE PERCENT of the atmosphere, and that fraction hasn't changed (significantly) in the last 100 years. They also won't mention that plants, which thrive in CO2 rich environment and produce OXYGEN, would thrive most in an enviroment of 17% CO2. I would be glad to DISCUSS this with anyone, but usually the LEFTIES/WarMongers don't want discussion, if you don't line up for their KOOL-AID your dismissed as an idiot. Don't confuse them with the FACTS, they don't care about the FACTS, this is really a guise for their true agenda, redistribution of wealth from the USA and EUROPE to the poor. Sign me Chill'in in Sunny Florida with my big Chevy AVALANCHE.

I believe that the global warming is a long term trend. the glaciers have been retreating for thousands of years. Where did the Great Lakes come from? The retreating glaciers left them. If everyone including the so called scientists are so worried about global warming why isn't there a cry in all the papers and magazines for population control. Last I looked everytime a human breathes we are expelling carbon dioxide into the atmosphere. The problem is not the automobile it's the extra billions of people now driving them. When the biased media talks about China it's always in an negative connotation of forced population control. The Chinese seem to be the most socially responsible country in the world when it comes to population control. So until I hear the liberal media backing forced population control I'll drive my SUV.

As far as I'm concerned, the evidence is still largely inconclusive regarding the existence of global warming caused by greenhouse gas surpluses by human activity.

I am more inclined to believe that the warming trend may be due to a natural climate oscillation that occurs every several decades, well before detailed record-keeping could be made.

There is historical evidence of warm climates hundreds of years ago around the middle ages followed by colder periods during the later part of the European renaissance and the American Revolution.

Now it appears that we are in a warming trend again and the warming could continue until it hits the peak, if it has not already, and then temperatures may start to fall. Of course, these cycles occur over a span of several decades. In addition, there will be unusual developments in weather such as cold snaps or heat waves that may merely be normal variations that do occur in a system as complex as Earth's climate instead of being indicative of a disruption of the cycle (it's a predictable cycle, overall, but it's not going to progress perfectly smooth because of variations that can and do occur unpredictably due to the complexity of the system, which is why computer models trying to explain long term trends of global warming can't be entirely relied upon as the programming of such simulation cannot take all of these variables into account in the long term; to give you an idea, this is also why there are uncertainties in long term weather forecasting because of the same problem).

However, there is one fact that is true: petroleum is a finite natural resource and, ironically, it takes the sensationalist and opportunist manipulation of the research of man-induced global warming, more or less, to scare people into taking action to change our energy infrastructure and indirectly conserve this resource by reducing its consumption to reduce CO2 emissions instead of merely understanding the fact that we may run out of oil in a few decades and, thus, must now start to make slow but steady progress towards other energy sources to maintain our current standard of living in addition to conserving petroleum for other important uses.

As for the comment by Mr. Lutz himself, he could have phrased it a bit less harshly, but he's rightfully questioning it.

That's what every responsible person should do as that's the only way to validate or invalidate an idea.

People who abhor those who question an idea are shortsighted because, if the idea is good, then it will endure and logically convert those who may have been hostile to it, which is the greatest way to show that the idea is good. If it can't stand up to reasonable skepticism, then it's a sign that, perhaps, the people who believe in it may need to re-evaluate the idea themselves.

Things like global warming shouldn't merely be taken for what it is as you should try to understand it yourself from both sides of the debate and then make the decision about whether or not you believe in it.

In addition, regarding political motivations, people should realize that motivations that could breed corruption are rampant on both sides. There is money and power at hand for both those who conclude that global warming is real (United Nations IPCC) and those who conclude that it is not (big oil).