Newton first theorized that for every action there is a reaction. And there's perhaps no better example of that than the United States' current monetary policy.
In an effort to stimulate economic growth in the aftermath of the housing sector slump and ensuing credit crunch, the U.S. Federal Reserve has lowered benchmark interest rates from 5.25% in September 2007 to the current 3%. The policy, most economists and Wall Street analysts agree, represents the right action: it will take both monetary and fiscal policy to right the U.S. economic ship-of-state.
Action, and reaction
But, as Newton tells us, that does not mean that the Fed's actions have not had reactive consequences: they have, the primary one being the further decline in the dollar's value versus the world's major currencies. That's because, all other factors being equal, money flows toward higher-interest-rate currencies and away from lower-interest-rate currencies.
Right now, the Europe's and Britain's benchmark interest rates are higher than the U.S.'s and after the ECB and Bank of England maintained that spread when they kept rates the same Thursday, the dollar fell anew. The dollar plunged another 1.2 cents against the euro to $1.5361 and about 1.5 cents against the British pound to $2.0021. The dollar also fell about 1 yen against Japan's yen to 102.85 yen.
And there are other consequences. The dollar's decline will also increase inflation, if foreign exporters increase the price of their goods to the U.S. to maintain the real value of their export revenue, if U.S. consumers do not switch to domestic goods. The dollar's slide will also reduce the attractiveness of U.S. assets to foreign investors: if a currency depreciates 5-10% in a year, that's like telling foreign investors they'll automatically lose 5-10% from day one, before any commercial activity takes place. For foreign investors, that's about as appealing as a New York Yankee baseball cap is in Fenway Park.
Further, oil analysts say the dollar's decline is also a factor in oil's recent surge over $105 per barrel. Institutional investors, trying to hedge against inflation, are buying oil futures, and other commodities.
The Fed's dilemma
The Fed doesn't want to increase inflation or to erode the attractiveness of U.S. investments, and it certainly doesn't want the price of oil to rise, but right now, it has no other choice, says independent currency trader Andrew Resnick, who sees the dollar falling to $1.65 versus the euro and to $2.05 versus the British pound by the end of 2008. (Resnick presently holds dollar-short positions in the euro-U.S. dollar and British pound-U.S. dollar pairings.)
What would end the dollar's slide? Many economists and analysts say it will take increased U.S. savings, lower U.S. consumption of foreign goods (including oil), and the elimination of the federal budget deficit. And yes, the resumption of strong U.S. economic growth, but as noted, the Fed is working on that.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-06-2008 @ 6:00PM
al coholic said...
Einstein was brilliant but I'm afraid Newton was responsible for the third law of motion.
As for the Fed, they unfortunately cannot help the poor slobs who need a break on their mortgages without stimulating inflation and weakening the dollar.
3-06-2008 @ 9:28PM
rcof971 said...
there is only 2 ways the gov. can pay it's. One is to inflate the money supply, and the other is to raise taxes. This is an election year, guess which path they will walk. We are in deep doo doo. No matter which path they choose, the blue collar worker will take it on the chin. The rich get richer, while the middle class sinks.
3-08-2008 @ 10:05AM
questioning? said...
How much can you believe this author or his source? 3 months ago he and his source were predicting a strong dollar by the end of 2008, only slightly complicated by fed rate cuts, but otherwise bullish. What such authors' stories can tell us is that they can only provide a very limited snapshot of market perceptions at a given time, and are otherwise useless or even worse misinformative. If you listened to these men in December as a part of the lay public looking for financial advice, you would have lost money. My guess is that Mr. Resnick made money as a momentum trader. Whose money? It has to come from somewhere. Possibly at the hapless reader's expense? Both these gentlemen need to work on the prognostication skills they are peddilng, unless they are not trying to be informative or predictive, but rather lead the innocents to the slaughter. I have never been so pessimistic about the future as now. I fear the American middle and lower classes are being set up to be the bag holders of deflating US dollars and homes. The real question is, what asset classes are safe anymore? I see bubbles everywhere.