Traders who favor technical analysis -- a highly specialized cadre in Wall Street's Concrete Canyon -- are quick to point out the mirror aspects to key price levels, in this case a psychological level, the $100 oil price. The oil market's recent, consecutive closes above $100 per barrel are a show of strength from a technical standpoint. That fact, combined with the mirror aspect -- or what was once psychological resistance at $100, is now psychological support at $100 -- means that oil may remain above $100 for a long time.
A $100 oil floor?
Further, traders are now talking about a "$100 floor" for the price of oil. You heard right -- $100 as a floor for oil's price, and it's not a comforting thought. Still, as technical analysts will note, it's a possibility that executives, economists and policy makers alike, not to mention typical citizens, will have to consider as a potential economic reality, moving forward.
Bearish view
Those who argue against the $100 floor price point to U.S. inventory statistics. Crude oil and related inventories have been rising for weeks. Further, gasoline demand has been flat year-over-year, and with a national unleaded regular gasoline price around $3.20 per gallon, there's a chance gasoline demand could actually fall this summer for the first time in more than 20 years. March 2007 U.S. gasoline consumption is already below March 2006 levels. Clearly, consumers are cutting back and the U.S. economy's sluggish growth is depressing energy demand further. Bears say that points to a substantial drop in oil's price -- perhaps well below $80 per barrel -- in the months ahead, which would demonstrate once and for all that oil's breach of $100 was Pyrrhic, bubblish, downright frothy, and hardly a floor.
Bullish view
Those who argue in favor of the $100 floor price say the U.S. market may be soft, but right now it's mostly about surging international demand for oil and a weak U.S dollar and economy. Strong economic growth in Asia, led by China and India, and in Latin America is driving a bull market in commodities, including a record price gain for the world's most vital commodity. These analysts say the demand is secular, global, and unlikely to be dampened by the U.S. economic slowdown. Further, there are few widely available substitutes for oil, although the bulls admit that may change in a year or so as alternative fuel development progresses. What's more, the falling dollar is forcing market participates to bid-up the price of oil, to both retain the commodity's purchasing power, and to enable it to serve as an inflation hedge. That points to an even higher price for oil and other commodities in the years ahead -- not merely in the months ahead -- demonstrating that oil's nine daily closes above $100 is substantive, legitimate, downright warranted, and a floor the world may one day look back at nostalgically as a time when oil was relatively cheap.
Oil Analysis: Oil's record price increase in the last six years -- oil is up about 350% since 2002 -- does display bubble characteristics. Still, until international demand growth slows and a host of geopolitical, and U.S. fiscal/monetary problems are solved, those arguing that $100 oil represents a floor price have a compelling case.
Reader question: What's your view on the price of oil? Does the $100 oil price represent a bubble? Or will we never see the likes of $50 oil, even $60 oil, again? And can producers and consumers do anything to lower the price of oil? Let us know what you think.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
3-07-2008 @ 1:13PM
Steve Johnson said...
An interesting question related to oil prices is whether supply can be increased from current levels. OPEC has decided to hold production steady for the next several months, citing market factors, but it is also possible that they simply can't produce significantly more oil than they are now. OPEC rules are biased toward inflated claims of oil reserves, and available oil in the ground could be less than claimed and harder to recover. The book "Twilight in the Desert" provides a fine analysis of Saudi oil status.
3-07-2008 @ 3:35PM
John said...
OPEC reserves are unknowable.
There is no such thing as a floor. Serious conservation by American consumes would halve the current barrel price.
The administration would never do that to their best friends.
3-07-2008 @ 3:36PM
John said...
OPEC reserves are unknowable.
There is no such thing as a floor. Serious conservation by American consumers would halve the current barrel price.
The administration would never do that to their best friends.
3-07-2008 @ 11:07PM
ken said...
just one word GREED!
3-07-2008 @ 11:20PM
ken said...
two words "PURE GREED"
3-08-2008 @ 11:25PM
V.J. DeMarco said...
In my opinion,the current members of the US Congress are either stupid or corrupt in allowing this oil situation to reach $100.00/bl If we had the willpower,a "national crisis" would be declared,suspend all the crazy environmental rules,begin to drill,begin a coal to oil conversion program,utilize oil sands, develop nuclear power,drive the cost of oil down to destroy the Arab cartel. Those who think "windmills" and "alternative sources of energy will appear within our lifetime to solve this problem are dreamers.
3-08-2008 @ 11:27PM
vince demarco said...
The Ethanol program courtesy of the US Congress is perhaps the largest rip-off of the US taxpayers much greater that the Boston "Big Dig" At least Boston got a hole in the ground and the price of food did not increase because of it. Producing Ethanol and not being able to deliver it in volume is a typical Government screw-up. It will never replace that amount of oil to help reduce our import of oil. However,it is driving up the price of ALL farm products =FOOD.Thank you Congress.
3-09-2008 @ 8:26PM
Will said...
Those who talk about "surging demand in China and India" conveniently forget that this "surging demand" is a direct result of the American consumers' demand for products that are manufactured in China, as well as India's outsourced service sector.
The real oil traders aren't the ones pushing the price of oil to these levels, it's speculators and large hedge funds. Ban these traitors (spelling intentional) from trading in crude, and restrict the trade in crude futures to entities who will actually take delivery of it, and this situation will sort itself out.
3-10-2008 @ 12:46PM
Baja Joes said...
Those who would trade FOOD for FUEL will starve!!
------------------------------------------------------