Finance chiefs from the G-7 notched-up their rhetoric on the dollar, but provided little substantial evidence they'll take actions -- monetary or fiscal -- to stem the dollar's slide, Bloomberg News reported Sunday night.
"We continue to monitor exchange markets closely, and cooperate as appropriate,'' the G-7 said, Bloomberg News reported, with U.S. Treasury Secretary Henry Paulson adding that the G-7 statement on currencies "reflects market developments and changes in the markets." The G-7 then pledged to implement further monetary and fiscal policies "as appropriate,'' without providing specific details.
No substantive action on dollar
Economist Peter Dawson told BloggingStocks Monday the G-7 statement by the United States, the United Kingdom, Germany, Japan, France, Italy, and Canada amounted to a statement against currency rate volatility, not a substantive effort to bolster the dollar. He added that G-7 representatives, in his interpretation, appeared more concerned about maintaining financial market liquidity due to the ongoing credit slump, than about the dollar's value.
The dollar has fallen more than 70% versus the euro and more than 30% versus the British pound since 2001. The dollar traded at $1.5820 versus the euro and at $1.9855 versus the British pound in Monday morning trading, down about 1 cent against each major currency.
Longer-term, however, in order to maintain the attractiveness of U.S investments, and to protect dollar purchasing power, Dawson said the United States must cut its federal budget deficit and trade deficit to reverse the dollar's decline -- issues that can only be resolved by the U.S. President and Congress, and by the American people (by saving more and consuming less), not by G-7 leaders.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
4-14-2008 @ 9:59AM
B. Harrison said...
The dollar has fallen 70% in comparison to the Euro? WOW! That is news to me; I thought that it had only dropped approximately 50%.
How much lower can and will it go? Once again, the posted omments keep disappearing; and the comments that were confirmed simply never are posted.
It looks like there is some sort of ongoing censorship by someonwe . . . would that be by AOL?