When a major, metropolitan U.S. newspaper discovers a investment trend or a hot sector, count on increased share demand for companies in the sector. When that paper is one of the top three dailies, in this case The Washington Post, count on even more demand.On Monday, The Washington Post examined the resurgence of the United States' railroad sector, touching on many of the themes discussed here during the past six months, and described why the rails' services are likely to be in demand for many years.
Is it too late to get in on a rail play? Hardly. P/Es are higher, so entry point is key, hence with the above in mind, here's a revised review of the rails, with the updated Sell / Stop Loss levels. They're ranked by risk, with the top stock, BNI, being the lowest risk.
Burlington Northern (NYSE: BNI), first reviewed at $89, p/e 17. Stop Loss: $56. Current Price: $99, p/e 20. Revised Stop Loss: $72.
Union Pacific (NYSE: UNP), first reviewed at $129, p/e of 19. Stop Loss: $84. Current Price: $137, p/e 20. Revised Stop Loss: $97.
Norfolk Southern (NYSE: NSC), first reviewed at $52, p/e 14. Stop Loss: $33. Current Price: $61, p/e 17. Revised Stop Loss: $42.
CSX Corp. (NYSE: CSX), first reviewed at $42, p/e 16. Stop Loss: $27. Current Price: $60, p/e 20. Revised Stop Loss: $42.
Canadian Pacific (NYSE: CP), first reviewed at $66, p/e 14. Stop Loss: $44. Current Price: $71, p/e 12. Revised Stop Loss: $48.
Railroad stocks were out of favor on Wall Street for the longest time. After World War II, auto travel spelled the decline of civilian rail transport, and in the 1960s truck transport displaced trains as the primary freight transport method.
The rails were about set to fade into oblivion when history finally started to swing in the rails' favor. In the 1990s, the Cold War ended, and globalization started. Emerging markets became new buyers of commodities and raw materials, and railroads added new international customers. Meanwhile, the price of oil began its decade-long march higher in 2001, to the record level of $117 per barrel this year, making container transport by rail cheaper in most instances than truck transport. And suddenly, the rails had new domestic customers for finished goods, to go along with its commodity transport business.
The risks: This is not to say owning a railroad stock does not involved risks. The rails remain vulnerable to a sustained downturn in the U.S. and/or global economies, and also vulnerable to the development of a cheap, widely-available, alternate fuel source for trucks.
But absent the above, the prospects look good for the rails, long-term. Even better, urban highway congestion projections suggest that rails will play a large role in inter-city goods transport: it's hard for trucks to get goods to their destination quickly when the highways are jammed.
Or, as the late, great comedian Alan King used to say, "Why do they call it rush hour on the highways when nothing moves?"
Disclosure: Lazzaro has no positions in stocks. In addition to private real estate holdings, he owns corporate and municipal bonds, and cash certificates of deposit.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
4-22-2008 @ 4:19AM
B. Harrison said...
The U.S. re-built the railways systems in japan, and in europe after WWII . . . we have neglected ouor railway systems since that time. Now that our economy is in a mess, and we don't have the resources to upgrade our railways, we need them more than ever. Shipping by rail is about ten times more cost effective by by trucking.
We really don't have the provisions for massive travel by passenger railway cars any more either.
Leave it to usamericans to wait until AFTER a disaster to do anything about our problems. the same was true about the economic crash . . . everyone basically knew what was going to occur generally; but NO ONE did anything until the economic system crashed. It's the "american way".
4-22-2008 @ 8:26PM
jaygreen123 said...
railroads my foot !!! I drive a cab and used my last of gas allotment today. what now ? politicians better get to work on gas prices !!
4-22-2008 @ 9:07PM
Robert T. Benson said...
Hello,
I am attempting to organize a National Fuel Boycott for June 30, 2008-July 5, 2008. I am asking all Americans to not purchase fuel(gasoline/diesel) for this entire week to shake up the oil companies for these outrageous prices while boasting record profits. I have contacted the major networks and have yet to hear from any of them so far. Please spread this around to all and email me at Rtbnsn1@aol.com if interested or can offer assistance in this worthwhile cause.
United We Stand!
Thank you,
Robert T. Benson
4-22-2008 @ 9:38PM
AMANDA said...
I am with Mr Benson, why are we taking this???
I am sick and tired of being forced to choose between milk, bread, or gas. I have three children, I work, and my husband works for Nabors drilling company, I also clip coupons, do side jobs, turn out lights, dont run air, and on and on to keep other bills down, so we can take our children to school, and ball so they can live a somewhat normal life.; If gas gets any higher we are going to have to stop all extra coricular activies so we can go to work and keep the lights on. Im sick of it. I say we band togethor as well....hey I own a bike and could probably stand to tone up.
4-22-2008 @ 9:51PM
Paul said...
Robert's idea isn't going to work, thats why the media isn't interested, neither am I.
I have a better idea.
Organize a national blockade of the refineries so nothing goes in/out until the oil companies buckle.
Link to different groups blocking refineries exit/entrances by computer/cell tx/ham radio.
Have all the groups coordinate their efforts all for the same time.
Tell the media ahead of time, I guarentee they will be there.
Have a wide screen tv on a truck connected to a puter @ ea site so everyone can see the stats/figures on the oil companies execs home pictures/finances & the oil companies profits as results of internet searches.
It is highly illegal but I think that it will do more than an attempted boycott.
Stop their production & watch what happens, they will get the message. I don't think that too many Joe & Janes will be too upset unless they work for the refineries.
But they also have to buy fuel & everything else, so why should they mind a work interruption that will bring everybody economic relief, including them?
PLW, Merrillville, In
4-22-2008 @ 10:06PM
tropicluv said...
I wish I could use the train!!! But when you live on an island in the middle of pacific, it's not quite that easy....
4-22-2008 @ 11:55PM
frank said...
well paul YOUR idea isnt going to work either. the refineries have plenty of reserve capacity and the companies can afford to bleed much longer than any individual. you need permits to protest.even if you were striking legally you do not have the right to block access you can count on the media showing up-- to watch you get arrested. compaies are making more profits because there is more demand- from developing countries.
4-23-2008 @ 12:07AM
Ron said...
Wake up people and use some common sense. These posts are just a bunch of senseless whining. There is no way that we can do a blockade of the refineries. Nor can we just stop buying gas for a week.
In addition, some of you need to go back to school and learn about economics. The reason the oil companies are making big profits is that they have invested huge amounts of money so that they can sell products that you want.
4-23-2008 @ 12:38AM
Jaminator737 said...
There are some other ways to avoid the high cost of fuel. Many steps to take have long since passed.
For those of you that placed a man in the oval office that owed many shady individuals many shady favors. YOU ARE THE IDIOTS THAT VOTED HIM IN! bY THIS I DO MEAN THE FISRST ELECTION NOT JUST THE SUPREME COURT JUSTICES THAT SHOULD HASVE RECUSED THEMSELVES BECAUSE THEY WERE APPOINTED BY GEORGE "D DUBYA EYE" (PRONOUNCED D W I) BUSH'S ALSO SHADY FATHER. then those of you morons that re elected him after he began leading the country down the path to the dark side. Now the puppet Pelosi that A) did not move to impeach them.
B) is letting them have all the funding they want to have out taxes pay for the all the things Iraq needs and doess not want to pay for such as Police.
Would it not be nice if OUR Military was in OUR country Defending OUR country?
How about if OUR police were getting the funds they needed to deal with the gangs that are making our schools terrorist zone?
Why cant OUR military patol our borders to keep Illegals out that are depriving our people from work AT A FAIR WAGE? Americans will do those jobs we just want a resonable wage to do it.
4-23-2008 @ 12:42AM
Cheryl said...
Railroads don't run between our subburb and downtown... and forget the bus unless you go downtown very early in the morning and come home when everyone else does...otherwise you are screwed. Or if you are like my hubby and need your car during the day to get to other appointmens or court. Nor can I take a bus to my daughter's home...no routes between here and there...and even if there were it would take me three times as long and I would have to probably walk several blocks and I am handicapped...my back can't take me walking far. It's the cars for us. No other logical options.
4-23-2008 @ 1:06AM
sadsh said...
I agree with Robert, a national boycott would definitely work, but i think it should be done differently, we should first boycott one particular oil company( the biggest/Exxon Mobile) to force them to bring their prices down, which would in turn result in other oil companies to follow behind in order to stay competetive! This would result in achieving our goal of overall lower gas prices! Remember,as customers, our business is crucial to the survival of these companies!
4-23-2008 @ 1:09AM
Ric Rachal said...
Maybe the people who can make a difference such as George Bush, Dick Cheney and Nancy Peliso along with Little Condi should have their salaries reduced to $40,000 and then they would have to pay for any gas used to travel along with the increased prices for food etc. Possibly then they would have some idea what the typical family is going through. Right now, they just don't give a damn because our taxes are paying for everything they need - no questions asked. Is this fair??????
4-23-2008 @ 1:19AM
HarleyD.02 said...
The elected president could help tremendously on fuel problems... IF HE WOULD QUIT USING AIR FORCE 1...(pardon if the name isn't correct) FOR PERSONAL USE, FLYING ALL OVER THE WORLD..IT COST OVER $50,000.00 TO EVEN GET THE THING OFF OF THE GROUND EACH AND EVERYTIME. All of the trips he's made are not ALL official business..Look at all the fuel that thing uses. Not to mention the Helicopter he uses TOO!!! (he's in the oil field business too making big bucks and probably trying to seal his deal in Iraq before he's booted out of the Whitehouse...can't be soon enough...VP is raking it in too with the oil company he's worked for..whatever it is that is over in Iraq...they have no worries!!!) Not to mention that he will get a CHECK EVERY YEAR FOR THE REST OF HIS LIFE, just like every other politician will also get. They don't pay or receive Social Security and they won't get it either....gee, why would you ever give that idea up??? I think the Government officials ought to pay SS and receive a sickly check each month like most Americans end up getting. That's just not fair. OUT OF THE OFFICE....NO MORE BIG MONEY!!!!
4-23-2008 @ 1:20AM
gene craig said...
Everybody and they're dog is bitching about gas prices. Funny, I don't see results. Words are free, results can cost some action. Let's really get results.
4-23-2008 @ 2:51AM
Dot said...
I LIVE IN SO. CALIFORNIA AND I HAVE PERSONALLY NOT SEEN LESS CARS ON THE ROAD; SO FOR ALL THE WHINING AND BITCHING, ACTIONS SPEAK LOUDER THAN WORDS. IN OTHER WORDS, GUESS IT CAN'T BE ALL THAT BAD BECAUSE EVERYONE HERE KEEPS ON DRIVING. HOWEVER, I AM SEEING FEWER PEOPLE AT THE CASINOS, MALLS AND RESTAURANTS.
4-23-2008 @ 3:30AM
wHY DON'T I HAVE ANY MONEY FOR FUEL OR JUST TO LI VE DAILY ANYMORE?? said...
I agree 100% with Robert T. Benson. The U.S. should standup and boycott all petroleum, gasoline, diesel fuels. If I had it my way, I would stop: driving, using lawn mowers, anything that needs petroleum fuels to start an engine. I would make the boycott last a very long time so it will hurt all profits with gasoline stations, the big oil companies, and especially OPEC and Saudi Arabia. It's time to fight back AMERICA! We can't handle these prices to live an everyday life! WHY CAN'T THE POLITICIANS WITH SUCH EXCELLENT PAYRAISES PAY FOR OUR GAS FUELS? THEY MAKE ENOUGH MONEY IN EACH STATE TO HELP EACH CITIZEN TO RUN EVERYONES CARS TO GO TO WORK, SO WE CAN PAY OUR MONTHLY BILLS TO SURVIVE!!!
4-23-2008 @ 4:18AM
Al Schrader ; said...
I made a few inexpensive changes to my truck and now it gets 4 miles to the gallon better
gas mileage.
You can email me for more info-
alfredschrader@aol.coml
4-23-2008 @ 6:13AM
Monty Python 1975 said...
Most people won't ride trains because they're old, noisy and dirty. Same goes for Greyhound. In Florida they have voted in a light rail transportation system but don't want to spend the money to made it attractive to riders like the monorails at adisney and in Seattle.
4-23-2008 @ 2:06PM
Jack said...
Hi! OPEC made $1 TRILLION in profit in 2007. Each Country pays a different amout for a barrel of oil. It all depends on their supply and demand. If a country uses less fuel, they pay less. If Americans drive less, we buy less and our prices go down. I believe it was around 1974 when the United States had gas rationing. Our political leaders made a law that we could buy gas every other day. The last digit of your license plate determined if it was an odd number or and even number to buy fuel. The gas lines were sometimes long but that practice lowered the gas prices. You might ask, "How can I use less gas?" You can car pool, you could use the railway, you can air your tires up, you can combine trips to the stores and errands you run, you can prevent filling your tank to the top so it won't spill on the road or it evaporates through the filler cap when the vapors expand, you can park your gas guzzler and use your other car or motorcycle. Some companies allow you to have flex hours. You could work 10 hours per day, 4 days per week, and save 52 trips back and forth to work per year. Imagine how much you could save if you car pooled with somebody that worked near you. We have car pool lots along the freeways in California. An example is 5 people drive to that lot and drive to work in one car or van. They return to that lot and drive home. Company or private vans pick up car poolers in those lots and take them to work and back. Their cost is much less than if they drove their own car and put mileage on it. The price of premium gas just hit $4.21 per gallon in southern California on April 21, 2008. It will go higher this summer if something isn't done! OPEC also controls the prices utility companies pay for their fuel. The amount of time your air conditioner or heater runs determines how much you pay. You can dig deep and pay the outrageous prices or you can do your part to drive the prices down. Are you a winner or a loser? Good luck! Jack
4-24-2008 @ 4:35PM
Jim said...
Paul,
Love your idea, but due to the unions getting broken back in the 80's and money protecting itself, most likely everyone would get arrested and the media would label them "terrorists".