Get the latest Age of Conan news and views at Massively!

AOL Money & Finance

Cramer on BloggingStocks: Sometimes, you just have to relent

TheStreet.com's Jim Cramer says the value guys threw this party, so respect the hosts.

Sometimes you just feel beaten into being positive. You just say, "OK, enough, I will accept the positives as they are being put out, not as I believe they are."

That's how I felt yesterday about Freddie Mac (NYSE: FRE) (Cramer's Take). The company put out financials yesterday that looked better than expected, and for once I didn't question whether they were.

I didn't because the earnings from so many of the feckless players -- the Fannies (NYSE: FNM) (Cramer's Take), the Washington Mutuals (NYSE: WM) (Cramer's Take) the MBIAs (NYSE: MBI) (Cramer's Take) and the Ambacs (NYSE: ABK) (Cramer's Take) -- are all being greeted with a bizarre positive response, so bizarre that I bought into the "better than expected" rhetoric because I don't want to fight the value guys who are in control right now.

Elsewhere on the site, Doug Kass has been putting up some very strong arguments that numbers from the likes of Freddie are less than meets the eye.

You know what? He's probably right. But when you get to the point where the big money has decided that there are just enough positives to make them come in and there aren't enough negatives to keep them out, you just have to join them -- you can't beat them.

I feel this way because in 1990, when I was inflexible and wanted to tell the bulls, "No, no, no, it is not over, there's much more downside," I started losing lots of money. I saw quarters like FRE's and decided to "see through" them and stay short.

After a few of them, I just said, "OK, I have made a lot of money shorting this group, I am now not only betting against the Fed, but I am betting against every value guy in the store."

I covered, and in some cases I went long.

I made a lot of money.

It wasn't "rigorous" to do. But it was right. And that's how we get paid.

Random musings: CBS (NYSE: CBS) (Cramer's Take) to buy CNet (NASDAQ: CNET) (Cramer's Take)? Les Moonves likes it as profitable and growing, but I always think of it as barely profitable or loss making and not growing. To each his own.

RELATED LINKS:

Jim Cramer is a director and co-founder of TheStreet.com. He contributes daily market commentary for TheStreet.com's sites and serves as an adviser to the company's CEO. At the time of publication, Cramer had no positions in the stocks mentioned.

Related Posts

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

Add your comments

Please keep your comments relevant to this blog entry. Email addresses are never displayed, but they are required to confirm your comments.

When you enter your name and email address, you'll be sent a link to confirm your comment, and a password. To leave another comment, just use that password.

To create a live link, simply type the URL (including http://) or email address and we will make it a live link for you. You can put up to 3 URLs in your comments. Line breaks and paragraphs are automatically converted — no need to use <p> or <br> tags.

New Users

Current Users

Symbol Lookup
IndexesChangePrice
DJIA+29.8811,632.38
NASDAQ+21.922,325.88
S&P 500+5.191,282.19

Last updated: July 24, 2008: 07:15 AM

BloggingStocks Exclusives

Hot Stocks

BloggingStocks Featured Video

TheFlyOnTheWall.com Headlines

WalletPop Headlines

    AOL Business News

    Latest from BloggingBuyouts

    Sponsored Links

    My Portfolios

    Track your stocks here!

    Find out why more people track their portfolios on AOL Money & Finance then anywhere else.