Back in December, The Wall Street Journal reported on the resurgent demand for special-purpose acquisition companies, also knows as SPACs or blank-checks. These are companies that are taken public for the sole purpose of seeking to acquire another operating company. If they can't find one with in a set period of time, they return the money to investors.
I was skeptical, writing that "Sometimes companies that go public through this process can be good investments, but there's something investors need to keep in mind: A company that has been acquired by a SPAC has just been put up for sale and is therefore unlikely to be undervalued. If the sellers could have gotten more for it, they would have sold it to someone else ... in general, I think blank checks are something for investors to avoid."
Now, less than six months later, Wall Street has turned on SPACs, and the rapid growth in blank check IPOs of late 2007 and early 2008 has subsided. According (subscription required) to the Wall Street Journal, the glut of these IPOs in recent months has left hedge funds -- their primary investors -- tired of them and, more dangerously, there are so many recently-formed SPACs on the prowl for acquisitions that they're "bumping into each other."
Of course some SPACs will be tremendously successful, but, in general, I still think investors should look elsewhere.
Blank check IPOs slumping -- good!
Posted May 20th 2008 11:35AM by Zac Bissonnette
Filed under: Newspapers, Initial public offerings
Closing Bell: Dubai sends jitters throughout the market (S, BBY)
Heinz looking good after the second quarter?
Why isn't Bank of America updating its shareholders on CEO situation?
