I almost can't believe that I'm writing about this, but I guess some prudes will get up in arms about anything.
BBC News reports that a U.S. based Christian group known as The Resistance is calling for a nationwide boycott of the coffee selling giant, Starbucks Corp. (NASDAQ: SBUX). The group's complaint against the company stems from the commemorative use of a toned-down version of the company's original logo. Starbucks states that the logo, which features a dual-tailed mermaid sporting cleavage, is not inappropriate. The fringe Christian group refers to the logo as a naked woman with legs "spread like a prostitute."
The news report from BBC states: "Howard Schultz, who bought Starbucks in 1982, described the emblem in his memoirs as "bare-breasted and Rubenesque; [it] was supposed to be as seductive as coffee itself."
To look at the logo that is claimed to offend, one has a difficult time even seeing it as raunchy. To call the flared dual tails a pair of spread legs might be a feat best accomplished while on serious hallucinogens. Clearly, this group of well-meaning Christians is at a loss for real issues to attack. The fringe group's lack of imagination in seeking some media exposure for itself is seen by me as a shallow act of spotlight grabbing.
Starbucks is reported by the BBC as stating that the bare breasted mermaid will appear on some of its cups for several weeks as part of a company promotion. It was not revealed which of Starbucks' 16,000 coffee shops in 44 countries will be featuring the racy mermaid cups. However, I'm sure that anyone who is interested in getting one of these alleged soft-porn coffee cups may rest assured that, before too long, they'll be available to anyone via eBay.
To see all 10 of Sarah Gilbert's top 10 best and worst naked advertising campaigns, click here.
Facebook's IPO Debacle, Day 3: Un-Friended and Dis-Liked on Wall…
Former Olympic Rower Turned to Minimalism to Pay Down $82,000 in Debt


Reader Comments (Page 8 of 8)
6-01-2008 @ 10:13AM
prnsr82 said...
Its not mermaid, its a siren... You learn that in Coffee 101 when you get hired at Starbucks
3-29-2009 @ 11:30AM
elo said...
What's weird to me is that I read that Starbucks had used this old logo in the NW before...and people were offended...maybe strange, but documented. So why would they go out of their way to use it again? Maybe at this point, they figure any attention is good attention? Dr. Tantillo ('the marketing doctor') blogged on the fact that it makes no sense to have a 'temporary' logo: http://blog.marketingdoctor.tv/2008/05/29/tantillos-branding-bite.aspx
6-01-2008 @ 2:24PM
larry said...
for those who love dunkins, be glad you have them.
they closed up all their stores in oregon.
i guess only east coast people like dunkins.
in the mean time why is shultz abandoning all the people who loved his coffee and trying to force that pike bland crap down our throats.
i wont drink that swill. so shultz:
you lost me
6-01-2008 @ 4:04PM
freda said...
the logo isn't even a human. it's a siren... a mermaid... a fictional sea creature. is someone really going to boycott sbux over a non-human product of someone's imagination? do we, as a society, really need to take offense to an artist's depiction of something that doesn't really exist?
i'm an sbux employee, but i know i was off the week the new cups were introduced, and all i could think was "wow, i wonder when the protests will begin." i still think they're pretty fun cups... conversation sparkers. i like the "rubenesque" description, and the fact that her nips are covered. i don't care if they are shown, but i'm not going to have a customer yell at me over a cup... like i'm queen of the sbux... and some people still think they can yell at me for random crap that my hourly wage and nonmanagerial position does not cover. not cool. i don't come to your place of work and act like an a-hole.
6-07-2008 @ 11:10PM
Bruceb said...
As long as people can pay $3-5 for a cup of jo, people will pay the rising cost of gas. $4 for a caramel something or other? For what, 20oz? I can think of much better things to spend my $4 on. All the high priced coffee shops are going to hurt as people stop spending. As for the logo, let them boycott if they want to. There are crazy so called 'christian' groups boycotting everything everywhere. They are free to believe what they want to, I guess. Just don't push your wacko beliefs on me
6-08-2008 @ 2:25AM
slow christian rock from outerspace said...
let the Christians fight! I'm sure they'll find a solution like an appropriate sticker to cover the offensive double tail; or, better, some religious souls at Starbucks will create the new Christian latte, probably new Muslim mocha and Mosaic kosher espresso, what about a Buddhist capuccino ? Starbucks should eliminate the cup # 666 and work with religious leaders in approving these drinks - much more to do but not enough time - for me, the donut and the Mac Donalds' logo are much more offensive ...let me know, where you find sinful coffee drinkers in the Good Book ?
6-09-2008 @ 3:28PM
dladybugn said...
Tell them "Christians-for-Nudity" will pose for the next logo...
Coffee, naked, Eden, works for me!
6-12-2008 @ 4:03PM
Glad2BChristian said...
I'm a Christian and I'm not offended by the logo nor do I care that Starbucks uses that logo. To attack all Christians, as some comment writers have done, is no different than attacking all muslims because of one suicide bomber, all whites because of the comments of a group skinheads or all blacks because of a Farrakhan tirade. Grow up people. This is one strange, fringe group and Christian bashing because of them is just as dumb.
6-13-2008 @ 1:04PM
BrianWall said...
I appreciate it when mermaids hold up their tails for me - it makes it much easier to make tadpoles.
Brian Wall
6-13-2008 @ 12:27PM
sonofray said...
Wow, "FREEDOM OF SPEECH!" ... oh, unless you're a Christian group and I don't agree with you.
Here's the deal folks, as Christians, we seek to be, and promote being like Christ (in the Bible ... heard of it?). He was perfect and sinless. We try, but are not. We will always look like hypocrites in one way or another. That's not what it's about. Enough with the "hypocrites" comments. Look at Christ, not us.
Graphically, a hideous logo. No, it's not pornography and I get the "return to our roots" nature of it, but it IS a bare-chested mermaid spreading her legs (or tails) to entice us, the story even quotes Howard Schultz as saying so. I doubt my daughter will see it and suddenly want to do that, buit is what it is, folks. It's not a stretch to think someone might not like it, and guess what ... they can say so! (gasp!)
8-18-2008 @ 2:22AM
katie jane said...
When I first got the new cup, I referred to her as the mer-ho. The name was well recepted in our barista... Learn the lingo. Since it is now hot, I have gone to an iced drink that comes in a clear plastic non-ho cup. Try it. No-Ho til winter, then it is ho ho ho..
8-12-2008 @ 3:23PM
njplowman said...
people are idiots, like nun on a bun, chocolate mary, state of idaho cornflake.
give it a rest people.