Sunday Funnies: Business should have NBA type salary cap


Most people in the United States and for sure shareholders of losing companies have been railing against executive pay for many years. It is generally agreed the salaries, bonuses, stock options, deferred compensation, and retirement packages have become ridiculous and do not reflect anything other then the "good ol' boy network" operating at its worst.

Compensation committees substantiate their decisions in a fashion that outlines plausible deniability not merit, value or truth. They do not reflect shareholders, employees, or customers best interest. They reflect a tight knit group that has to pay and pay big so that they can get theirs in the next round.

This brings me to the National Basketball Association and its use of the salary cap. We just witnessed an NBA finals where the better team won (Boston Celtics in six games) and that is the nature of the game. It's five on five, the best player does not take every shot and the best player cannot defend the other team by himself.

It is free agent season in the NBA and teams are making their moves to lock up talent for next year and beyond. The right player can have much more of an impact on a basketball team then most CEOs (Buffett, Gates, and Jobs not withstanding), yet there are limits to compensation.

Now my favorite quote of the week. "What can I do for my family with $127 million that I can't do with $111 million?" asked Gilbert Arenas. One of the top free agents in the NBA agreed to re-sign with the Washington Wizards for $111 million over six years, forfeiting millions of dollars so that his team could have more financial flexibility in signing other teammates.

We know that many company boards do not know what they are doing because we have just witnessed many fire their CEOs for major failures in leadership. They too have failed, because they overpaid these guys when they were employed, did not do a very good job of oversight, and then overpaid again when they gave them the boot.

If they really had a clue they would seek out the top 100 senior vice presidents and store managers and young rising stars instead. They could also reward shareholders with dividends and save some cash for a rainy day. There is no telling the good that can be done with the wasted money thrown at overbloated, egotistical executives that in many cases have been compensated beyond any rational amount.

I want to laugh, and cry, when I read that someone got $50 million dollars to accept a position at a new company when he may have only been receiving $5 million (a pittance) in his previous position. Like he would have rejected $30 million.

Sheldon Liber is the CEO of a small private investment company and the principal for design and research at an architecture & planning firm. He writes the columns Chasing Value and Serious Money.

Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)

Symbol Lookup
IndexesChangePrice
DJIA+57.4812,858.71
NASDAQ+22.952,926.83
S&P 500+7.471,350.11

Last updated: February 13, 2012: 10:09 AM

Hot Stocks

General Electric

18.97+0.095(+0.50)

Alcoa

10.415+0.125(+1.21)

Apple Inc

500.48+7.06(+1.43)

Google Inc 'A'

612.56+6.65(+1.10)

Bank of America

8.27+0.20(+2.48)

Wal-Mart Stores

61.900.00(0.00)

Exxon Mobil Corp

83.98+0.18(+0.21)

Ford

12.63+0.19(+1.53)

Citigroup

33.45+0.525(+1.59)

IBM

192.61+0.19(+0.10)

Yahoo

16.15+0.01(+0.06)

Starbucks

48.81-0.01(-0.02)

Microsoft

30.73+0.235(+0.77)

Home Depot

45.67+0.34(+0.75)

DailyFinance Headlines

Benzinga Headlines

TheFlyOnTheWall.com Headlines

BioHealth Investor Headlines

WalletPop Headlines

DailyFinance BlackBerry App

My Portfolios

Track your stocks here!

Find out why more people track their portfolios on AOL Money & Finance then anywhere else.

BloggingStocks Partners

More from AOL Money & Finance

BioHealth Investor Headlines

Page Loaded in 1329145754179 ms.