Ted Allrich is the founder of The Online Investor and author of the just released book: Comfort Zone Investing: Build Wealth And Sleep Well At Night. In this weekly column, he'll offer advice to investors who are just getting started.
There are clearly some banks, thrifts and other financial institutions doing better than others. That became clear in the most recent earnings releases. Wells Fargo & Co. (NYSE: WFC) showed a profit. True, lower than last year but that was expected. What wasn't expected was better revenues and lower losses. JPMorgan & Chase & Co. (NYSE: JPM) had a similar story. So did Bank of America Corp. (NYSE: BAC). Citigroup (NYSE: C) gave better than predicted numbers. Those were the good announcements.
Not doing so well is Wachovia Bank (NYSE: WB). That loss was much larger than analysts projected. The bank cut the dividend, as expected. The stock gave up more ground.
If this truly is an investing once-in-a-lifetime opportunity, as some think but not all, then which financials warrant investors' time and eventually money? Here are some guidelines.
Clearly the old rule applies: follow the money. It will tell you which banks or thrifts or insurance companies are going to prosper when the economy recovers. Which ones will those be? The ones who are still making profits when the worst credit crunch has hit since the Depression. The ones who have reserved generously for future losses. The ones whose dividend hasn't changed. In the case of Wells, it was actually increased in the last quarter by 10%.
The dividend is a good indicator of management's optimism or pessism. Companies are loathe to cut a dividend. They know some investors buy their stocks for the quarterly payout. If they cut it, those investors will sell, adding more pressure to the stock price. On the other hand, to raise the dividend is to suggest the future looks so bright that a higher dividend is not a stretch and that paying it for quite some time seems very probable.
Another indicator is forward looking statements, forecasts of future revenues and/or earnings. At this time, most will be very conservative. It doesn't pay to set up investors for disappointment by forecasting strong numbers. Most CEO's will give a worst case scenario, one that suggests tempering one's enthusiasm is warranted given current conditions. The more conservative the future predictions, the more likely the company will beat them.
The stocks to watch out for are the ones where management is singing a completely different tune from the rest of the industry. If the leaders in a group are all singing "The Eve of Destruction" and a smaller firm is belting out "Happy Days Are Here Again", then complete and total scrutiny of why is in order. More than likely what affects one financial institution will affect all of them which are in the same business.
That's a distinction to make as well. Just because a company has the word "bank" in its name doesn't mean its portfolio is full of subprime mortgages. Some banks only focus on Trust services. Others make construction loans. Investors need to know what a bank does to secure its niche. That doesn't mean these institutions are exempt from selling pressure. They will feel some of the downdraft but not as much as banks or thrifts or insurance companies loaded with bad mortgages. Therein lies the opportunity for the studious investor.
Pick through the financials with these criteria in mind: positive earnings (not necessarily increasing, just positive), large loan loss reserves, conservative forward statements, industry niche. And don't be concerned about any rallies some of them have already seen. These stocks have been battered to levels that haven't been touched in decades. There's still plenty of upside left for smart investors.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-26-2008 @ 3:13PM
KEN said...
GRAB YOUR CASH IT S GONNA CRASH DO DA DO DA
BROKER S STEALIN YOUR CASH DO DA DO DA DAY
STEAL IT INTHE DAY
STEALIT IN THE NIGHT
GRAB YOUR CASH IT S GONNA CRASH DO DA DO DA DAY
7-27-2008 @ 8:44AM
alan said...
Mr. Allrich provides the most superficial and meaningless "advice" ever.
Follow the money straight to oblivion is a more accurate description using his advice. Oh boy, Citi lost less money than analyst estimates. IT'S STILL THREE CONSECUTIVE QUARTERS OF LOSS WITH ANOTHER ONE OR TWO TO GO.
Has Allrich bothered to analyze Citi's assets both on and off trhe books, they still have over 1 TRILLION $ of level 3 assets. Does he really think all of the SIV and CDO crap is written off?
Now add to this the souring economy and the implications for credit card, auto loan, commercial credit, and prime mortgage issues, and you do not have an optimistic picture for rapid recovery. Even the lying CFO of CITI said as much in the recent quarterly call. THe new euphanism he used is"strong headwinds".
Allrich is just another writer turned "financial expert" trying to hawk his new book. SAVE YOUR MONEY !!!!!
7-29-2008 @ 10:11AM
alan said...
Post script-- looks like more ugly write offs/write downs for the big C in 3Q.
C management and Allrich both have ZERO CREDIBILITY !!!!!!
7-29-2008 @ 11:33AM
Beltway Greg said...
Just buy Citi whenever it falls under $18.00. Just shut-up and do it. It isn't going to fail. Within 3 years you'll look like the genius you aren't. Oh yes, you'll be able to be the big man at the cocktail parties and tell them all how you stood firm when the others cut and run. We'll know different but it will make for a good story.
Beltway Greg
8-02-2008 @ 11:37AM
matt said...
author's name is Ted Allrich, is that a financial stage name ? get it? (All Rich-he's very wealthy)