In this series, we take a look at the 25 stocks on the S&P 500 Index (SPX) that have turned in the worst performance during the past decade -- what went wrong, and what happens next.
Though it's possible that sentimentality may have influenced the vote, an expert panel assembled by the Global Automotive Elections Foundation named Ford Motor Company's (NYSE: F) Model T as "Car of the Century" in 1999.
Viewed from a glass-half-full perspective, this was an honor. From a less rosy viewpoint, the award also spoke to the relative lack of success enjoyed by Ford's automobile offerings in the hundred years that have passed since the Model T's introduction.
What went wrong? At No. 8 on our list of SPX underperformers, F lost 85% of its value during the 10-year period that concluded on June 30, 2008. In April 1999, Ford seemed ready to retake its 1994 peak at $40. However, the shares climbed only as high as $38.72 before embarking on a long-term descent.
Ford reacted to the changing auto landscape by ramping up marketing efforts on its compact Focus. And, in a move unusual for a producer of gas-guzzlers, the company admitted in 2000 that SUVs were both unsafe for drivers of smaller cars, and overly harsh on the environment. Ford pledged to address both issues on future redesigns,s in a move that seemed to both puzzle and delight environmental watchdogs. Shortly thereafter, production was scaled back on the Excursion SUV due to weakening demand.
Elsewhere, other fundamental pressures were creeping in. Several European brands were under the Ford umbrella by this point, including Aston Martin, Jaguar, and Volvo. Unfortunately, due to unfavorable pound/euro exchange rates, Ford was forced to scale back production at its English facilities. Plus, the company came under fire when regulators alleged that known safety concerns about recalled Firestone tires were swept under the rug by Ford executives. Simultaneously, a California judge ordered Ford to recall two million vehicles that were sold despite the company's knowledge of a faulty ignition system.
Ford shares suffered as a result of the tire debacle, and fallout from the scandal would plague the company for years. It didn't help that the entire auto industry was experiencing a sales slowdown. By October 2001, Ford said it would cut its dividend for the first time in a decade; in early 2002, plans were announced to lay off 20,000 workers. Meanwhile, Japanese rival Toyota Motor (NYSE: TM) was winning over some old critics by opening plants in the U.S. By 2006, Toyota would overtake Ford in U.S. auto sales. It was a year in which Ford -- saddled with increasingly unpopular vehicle offerings and rising health-care costs -- lost $12.6 billion.
What next? The auto maker is still grasping to get a firm hold of its own bootstraps. During the past year, Ford sold its Aston Martin, Jaguar, and Land Rover brands, in an attempt to trim some fat and regain focus on its core models. Recently, the company ran an ad campaign trumpeting the results of a survey which revealed its quality was now on par with Toyota's (a questionable tactic that may have only served as an unpleasant reminder to consumers).
Meanwhile, record-high oil prices have only served to exacerbate pressure on the auto sector. Ford shares now trade near $5, a far cry from their previous heights. Most troubling, the company has failed to mimic the previous success of its Taurus. David Healy of Burnham Securities is one of many analysts who are bearish on the stock. As he recently noted to a Dow Jones reporter, "Ford is pretty thin on vehicles customers want right now."
Ford's struggles were highlighted in its second-quarter earnings report on July 24. The company swallowed a loss of $3.88 per share, easily outstripping analysts' consensus estimate for a loss of 27 cents per share. During the quarter, Ford recorded $3.5 billion in write-downs on its auto business, and another $2.1 billion on leases at its credit arm.
Elizabeth Harrow is an analyst and financial writer in the research department at Schaeffer's Investment Research. She is featured in the weekly video series Option Basics on SchaeffersResearch.com.











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
7-25-2008 @ 11:51AM
Deborah said...
FORD ... WAKE UP AND SMELL THE GAS!!!
YOU AND ALL CAR MAKERS NEED TO GO ELECTRIC! NOT BIO-FUEL, NOT ANY FUEL!!!
WE ARE SICK OF OIL AND FUEL CORPORATIONS MAKING US SLAVES TO THE NEED TO PURCHASE ANY KIND OF FUEL. WHILE THE CORPORATIONS LIE AND TAKE US INTO WARS THEY ARE MAKING SO MUCH MONEY THAT THEY ARE THE ONES CONTROLLING THE WORLDS ECONOMY AND POLITICS. NO COUNTRY IS SAFE FROM THIS GREED. IF YOU WHAT TO SELL YOUR CARS AND STAY IN BUSINESS, AND MAKE MONEY TOO. CONVERT ALL YOUR VEHICLES TO ELECTRIC. YOU'LL HAVE PEOPLE WAITING IN LINE TO BUY THEM!!!!!!
7-25-2008 @ 12:10PM
R.Stark said...
Get Off your Back Sides. Electric is the answer, I know you have a car right now, you can put on the market right now!!!!!!.
Oil they make to must money, part of that money can belong to FORD, Again get of your back sides
7-25-2008 @ 12:25PM
Leon said...
I've read many articles on Ford's woes and they never really seem to hit on one that I think is key. Their customer service is terrible. I made the conscious decision in late 1996 to buy American and drove a stake in the ground by making my car company Ford. By 2002, I was buying Toyota and haven't looked back. What caused the change? Complete lack of customer service. I had a problem which was major enough that I had to get the NHTSA involved and eventually resulted in the recall of tens of thousands of cars. When I first went to Ford, the recall was already in place but they told me that even though my car had the same symptoms, it clearly was not the same problem because my car hadn't been recalled. Their customer service was so bad, I was not allowed to speak to a first line manager about the problem. I was told by the "customer service rep" that she would not escalate my problem to a first line manager, and that if I complained via letter, she would intercept the letter and that would be the end of it so I should just give up now. Because my problem was serious enough that it posed a clear and present danger to all drivers of my make and model, I went to the NHTSA and my car was recalled shortly after. Ford is now one of two automakers I will not ever consider buying again. For those that value their loved ones, please don't buy Ford. Ever.
7-31-2008 @ 1:59AM
Kent said...
I have a theory that the auto industry is mesomorphically heading out the door as we transition from manufacturing to IT industries. Is it evident that the U.S. is finally heading toward a post-industrialized society that was touted several years ago by Peter Drucker that the U.S. as it advances economically will transistion from manufacturing to service industires as all advanced economies are dialetically destined to become? This all comes out of my recall from my college days.
8-28-2009 @ 1:36PM
A.T Riccio said...
With all the Auto companies trying to find new technoligy We as a group of engineers who have been working on a new rotational magnetic engine that we believe will be the engine of the future .It uses no fossil fuel or emits NO polution of any kind.It can power our cars.trucks-our homes and endless uses. We have tried contacting most of the auto companies to join us and partner with us and it falls on deaf ears.they are so invested in other usless systems it's laughable..they are NOT feasable for the masses.
we have tried for grants .and other participants alliances.and have no luck...We dont have the lobbyists to sell these whacky systems..
So how do we get help in bringing this new energy system to the point where it will help all of us and will be the next big american invention that will change the world of energy forever and get us out of the strangle hold the oil group has on all of us
7-31-2008 @ 10:27AM
jpdr1100 said...
Riccio, the way you get your invention noticed is the way its been done for decades. You hire a recognized independent test facility (SouthWest Research, FEV, AVL, Ricardo, etc) and you pay them to honestly test your device. If it has merit, you publish those results in an SAE paper and present it to the industry at one on the SAE conventions.
If you actually have something, it will get noticed and you will get calls. If you are, as many other are, trying to sell fish oil, that will be uncovered as well.
7-31-2008 @ 12:32PM
Kent said...
Riccio - Have you tried or explored this govt./pvt. consortium on automotive development?
http://www.uscar.org/guest/rnd_areas.php
8-04-2008 @ 12:43PM
jpdr1100 said...
I'd forget about going to USCar looking for money. That organization is simply there to funnel US tax dollars into Detroit's coffers. It is a slick, hidden means for the government to support the industry, while allowing everyone to still bitch about how the Japanese are government backed and our boys have to stand alone.