And yet, we're told 'the economy is growing.'
What's going on here? Or, investors and readers may justifiably exclaim, "If this is growth, I'd hate to see what a recession looks like."
On Friday,BloggingStocks asked economist Peter Dawson to give an accurate read on the economic situation in these United States.
"Don't you have an easier question for a summer Friday?," Dawson said. "Kidding aside, what we're experiencing now is a growth-recession. And at this point, and we'll need a few more data points to confirm it, it's looking close to a textbook case of one."
During a growth-recession, the economy continues to grow, barely, Dawson says, but almost all of the other indicators continue to move in a destructive direction.
The U.S. economy: barely moving
Dawson offered the analogy of a horse-drawn covered wagon traveling slowly west across the hot, dry, desert southwest United States: you're moving, but if you don't find water pretty quick, there's going to be a problem.
Dawson said that due to the requirements of a return on equity, and the continual, monthly increase in new adults eligible for work, the U.S. economy must grow by least 2% per year, to remain healthy. "A 2% or better GDP growth rate increases demand for goods and services, which leads to profit growth and job growth. Ideally, we should grow at or above 3% per year. Some economists put it slightly lower, but I tend to argue with the higher GDP growth models."
However, if growth drops below 2%, bad things occur, like that slow-moving covered wagon, economically speaking, Dawson said. "Growth came in at a negative 0.2% in the fourth quarter of last year, at 0.9% in the first quarter and 1.9% in the just completed second quarter, so we're well below that 2.0% mark, during the last nine months," Dawson said. "That's why people looking around see lay-offs, reduced staffing, and why many businesses, particularly retail, are seeing less traffic. What we're experiencing is a growth-recession."
'When upscale wine sales decline....that's a danger sign'
And it doesn't take the investigative zeal of a John Walsh to detect the tell-tale signs of the growth-recession. Many retailers are being hit particularly hard. A native of Chicago, Dawson likes to pick up an upscale bottle or two of wine at a favorite, trendy wine shop when he visits his parents back in the Windy City. Dawson said a chat with the wine shop's owner indicated that "wine sales were down about 20-25%, on a year-over-year basis." The shop had laid-off one employee, and reduced hours on Monday to a half-day, "because no one was coming in the store on Mondays," he said.
"When upscale wine sales decline, that's a problem, a danger sign for the economy because it shows that even upper-middle-income consumers are cutting-back spending, are concerned about the economy's health. Mall store owners, particularly discretionary purchase stores, and restaurants are feeling the slow growth conditions keenly also," Dawson said. "But really, the slow growth conditions are all around, except in the oil patch states. This is what a growth-recession looks like."
What will it take, to get this nation's economy moving again?, to quote President John F. Kennedy.
"We need a growth engine, be it an investment in infrastructure, renewable energy, information technology, or business investment etc. ...something that solves a pressing problem, creates good jobs, and makes the nation more prepared for the international economy of the 21st century," Dawson said. "When that occurs, the growth-recession will be over."
Economic Analysis: On to economist Dawson's analysis we'll simply add we hope that growth engine appears sooner rather than later: there's plenty of work to be done [electric grid, highways/rails, hospitals, schools, renewable energy].











Reader Comments (Page 1 of 1)
8-01-2008 @ 5:01PM
william lindblad said...
Your so-called "growth recession" is not at all that complicated nor difficult to explain. The growth is from the only area that has yet to be effected - exports.
This area is going to dry up shortly and it will end all the debate on economic conditions.
8-02-2008 @ 2:21AM
Edgar Beverly said...
The economic growth (?) we see is in the $$$ in petroleum sales. Gallons may be down, but dollars are up. As this sector gorges on our fiscal resources, we have less to spend on the nice things that provide jobs to our fellow citizens. As a result, they go out of work and onto un-employment and welfare. The rest begins not even spending on imports (other than food, the USA is now a food importer - we can no longer feed ourselves!) Then, since we are not funding the Regime of China, they will begin to have some problems in feeding their people. Take this train of thought, propose your own route, and where does it lead? 16 years ago, a very healthy economy was handed over to a bright boy who attended Oxford; problem was, his wife was a part of the equation. Remember, it takes quite a few years for an economy to react to stimulii! We are now reaping the crop of the Clinton years (agreed, funding a war is not a lot of help!!) I really don't think we are ready of another dose of that medicine, irrespective of the number of spoonfuls of sugar proposed by the apparent nominee.
8-03-2008 @ 11:17PM
tom kelly said...
hey stop the sick and stupid thinking, and look with your eyes and see that the oil companies make get this 51 billion holy grap
8-04-2008 @ 8:17AM
kaye shinker said...
Give the American public some credit. They refused to pay extremely high prices for houses bringing that industry to its knees and now they are slowly working on the energy business. Next retailers/food?